Christian M Lange1, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Wolfgang Miesbach, Stefan Zeuzem, Jörg Albert. 1. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine 1, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Cardiology, Department of Medicine 3, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine 2, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Germany, more than half a million persons, most of them elderly, are under long-term treatment with anticoagulants. The approval of new oral anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors, as well as new data on periprocedural bridging with heparins, have introduced marked complexity to the management of treatment with anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors for endoscopic interventions in visceral surgery. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed, as well as on the relevant guidelines. RESULTS: Robust data are available on the management of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and platelet aggregation inhibitors for endoscopic procedures; on the other hand, the data on the periprocedural management of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are still inadequate. Endoscopic procedures that carry a low risk of bleeding can be performed under treatment with anticoagulants or platelet aggregation inhibitors. Before any procedure with a high risk of bleeding (≥ 1.5%) oral anticoagulants of any type and P2Y12 inhibitors should generally be discontinued. Patients in whom VKA are temporarily discontinued for this reason need bridging treatment with heparin only if they are at high risk of thromboembolic events (≥ 10% per year). For patients who are anticoagulated with NOAC, timely discontinuation of the drug depending on renal function is of key importance, and bridging is usually unnecessary. CONCLUSION: Adequate scientific evidence supports the current recommendations and treatment algorithms for the periprocedural management of oral anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors in endoscopic procedures. Larger-scale studies are still needed to provide a sound basis for the corresponding recommendations about NOAC.
BACKGROUND: In Germany, more than half a million persons, most of them elderly, are under long-term treatment with anticoagulants. The approval of new oral anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors, as well as new data on periprocedural bridging with heparins, have introduced marked complexity to the management of treatment with anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors for endoscopic interventions in visceral surgery. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed, as well as on the relevant guidelines. RESULTS: Robust data are available on the management of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and platelet aggregation inhibitors for endoscopic procedures; on the other hand, the data on the periprocedural management of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are still inadequate. Endoscopic procedures that carry a low risk of bleeding can be performed under treatment with anticoagulants or platelet aggregation inhibitors. Before any procedure with a high risk of bleeding (≥ 1.5%) oral anticoagulants of any type and P2Y12 inhibitors should generally be discontinued. Patients in whom VKA are temporarily discontinued for this reason need bridging treatment with heparin only if they are at high risk of thromboembolic events (≥ 10% per year). For patients who are anticoagulated with NOAC, timely discontinuation of the drug depending on renal function is of key importance, and bridging is usually unnecessary. CONCLUSION: Adequate scientific evidence supports the current recommendations and treatment algorithms for the periprocedural management of oral anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors in endoscopic procedures. Larger-scale studies are still needed to provide a sound basis for the corresponding recommendations about NOAC.
Authors: E Masci; G Toti; A Mariani; S Curioni; A Lomazzi; M Dinelli; G Minoli; C Crosta; U Comin; A Fertitta; A Prada; G R Passoni; P A Testoni Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: I A Du Rand; J Blaikley; R Booton; N Chaudhuri; V Gupta; S Khalid; S Mandal; J Martin; J Mills; N Navani; N M Rahman; J M Wrightson; M Munavvar Journal: Thorax Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: David H Birnie; Jeff S Healey; George A Wells; Atul Verma; Anthony S Tang; Andrew D Krahn; Christopher S Simpson; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Benoit Coutu; Tiago L L Leiria; Vidal Essebag Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Deborah Siegal; Jovana Yudin; Scott Kaatz; James D Douketis; Wendy Lim; Alex C Spyropoulos Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Axel Schlitt; Csilla Jámbor; Michael Spannagl; Wiebke Gogarten; Tom Schilling; Bernhard Zwissler Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: S M Schellong; H Riess; M Spannagl; H Omran; M Schwarzbach; F Langer; W Gogarten; P Bramlage; R M Bauersachs Journal: Internist (Berl) Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 0.743
Authors: S M Schellong; H Riess; M Spannagl; H Omran; M Schwarzbach; F Langer; W Gogarten; P Bramlage; R M Bauersachs Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 1.041