Antonia Matamalas1, Juan Bagó2, Elisabetta D Agata3, Ferran Pellisé2. 1. Service of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Vall d´Hebrón, Passeig de la Vall d´Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. amatamalasadrover@gmail.com. 2. Service of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Vall d´Hebrón, Passeig de la Vall d´Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Institut of Research Hospital Vall d´Hebrón, Passeig de la Vall d´Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the relationship between radiological, clinical and perceived waistline asymmetry (WLA) in a sample of idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients. METHODS: 77 patients were included (mean age 20.3 years; 85 % women). We obtained a full X-ray of the spine and back clinical photography for all patients. On photographs, waist height angle (WHA), right/left waist angles (WA) and right/left waistline distance ratio were measured. SRS22, Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS) and Spinal Appearance Questinnaire (SAQ) questionnaires were also completed. The intra and inter-observer reliability of each photographic measure was assessed. A correlation analysis between all variables was done using Pearson Correlations Coefficient. RESULTS: All measures reported have excellent intra- and inter-observer (ICC ≥0.8) reliability. A significant correlation was found between WHA and Cobb angle, mainly with Main Thoracic (MT) (r = -0.56). Right and left waist angles, and especially the difference between them (RLWAD), is related to the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TLL) curve. We have found a significant correlation between RLWAD and TLL curve magnitude (r = -0.54) and with the inclination of the lower end vertebra (LEV) (r = 0.74). Only WHA has a significant, but poor correlation (r ≅ 0.3) with trunk perception scales (TAPS and SAQ). No other significant correlations were found between WLA measures and patient related outcome scores. CONCLUSION: WLA measures proposed in this article are reliable tools to assess WLA. We have found a significant correlation between clinical WLA and skeletal deformity (Cobb angle). WHA is related with MT curve while the RLWAD depends on the TLL curve magnitude and its LEV. We have also found a significant relation between WHA and the patient's perception of the deformity. It seems that WLA is a cosmetic concern to take into account in clinical evaluation of IS patients.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the relationship between radiological, clinical and perceived waistline asymmetry (WLA) in a sample of idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients. METHODS: 77 patients were included (mean age 20.3 years; 85 % women). We obtained a full X-ray of the spine and back clinical photography for all patients. On photographs, waist height angle (WHA), right/left waist angles (WA) and right/left waistline distance ratio were measured. SRS22, Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS) and Spinal Appearance Questinnaire (SAQ) questionnaires were also completed. The intra and inter-observer reliability of each photographic measure was assessed. A correlation analysis between all variables was done using Pearson Correlations Coefficient. RESULTS: All measures reported have excellent intra- and inter-observer (ICC ≥0.8) reliability. A significant correlation was found between WHA and Cobb angle, mainly with Main Thoracic (MT) (r = -0.56). Right and left waist angles, and especially the difference between them (RLWAD), is related to the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TLL) curve. We have found a significant correlation between RLWAD and TLL curve magnitude (r = -0.54) and with the inclination of the lower end vertebra (LEV) (r = 0.74). Only WHA has a significant, but poor correlation (r ≅ 0.3) with trunk perception scales (TAPS and SAQ). No other significant correlations were found between WLA measures and patient related outcome scores. CONCLUSION: WLA measures proposed in this article are reliable tools to assess WLA. We have found a significant correlation between clinical WLA and skeletal deformity (Cobb angle). WHA is related with MT curve while the RLWAD depends on the TLL curve magnitude and its LEV. We have also found a significant relation between WHA and the patient's perception of the deformity. It seems that WLA is a cosmetic concern to take into account in clinical evaluation of IS patients.
Authors: Scott Yang; Sean M Jones-Quaidoo; Matthew Eager; Justin W Griffin; Vasantha Reddi; Wendy Novicoff; Jeffrey Shilt; Ernesto Bersusky; Helton Defino; Jean Ouellet; Vincent Arlet Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Patricia L Smith; Sandra Donaldson; Douglas Hedden; Benjamin Alman; Andrew Howard; Derek Stephens; James G Wright Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: K H Bridwell; H L Shufflebarger; L G Lenke; T G Lowe; R R Betz; G S Bassett Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2000-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Sandra Donaldson; Douglas Hedden; Derek Stephens; Benjamin Alman; Andrew Howard; Unni Narayanan; James G Wright Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; Kevin F Spratt; Kirk K Peterson; Mark J Spoonamore; Ignacio V Ponseti Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-02-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Juan Bago; Jose M Climent; Anna Ey; Francisco J S Perez-Grueso; Enrique Izquierdo Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 3.468