Literature DB >> 12131715

Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements.

Roland K Pratt1, R Geoffrey Burwell, Ashley A Cole, John K Webb.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective 2-year follow-up study evaluated patients treated surgically for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
OBJECTIVE: To report parents' perception, patients' perception, and pain and disability before and after surgery and to examine their relationship to anthropometric, back surface, and radiographic measurements. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No longitudinal studies have examined these factors and their interrelationships.
METHODS: Between 1995 and 1999, 39 AIS patients treated by anterior or posterior USS (Universal Spine System, Stratec, Oberdorf, Switzerland) instrumentation had complete prospective questionnaire, back surface, and radiographic appraisal.
RESULTS: The preoperative Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain-predominantly mild backache-was 24 mm (range, 0-78 mm), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was 9.2% (0-44.4%). Patients and parents wanted surgery to correct spinal curvature, stop curve progression, and correct the rib-hump (thoracic) and hip and waist asymmetry (thoracolumbar curves). The maximum angle of trunk inclination correlated with VAS and with short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire scores for thoracic curves (P = 0.005, Spearman rank correlation coefficient). Apical vertebral translation correlated with short-form McGill scores and ODI for thoracolumbar curves (P < 0.006, Spearman rank correlation coefficient). Parents rated scoliosis problems more severely than did their children (P < 0.0001, repeated measures of multivariate analysis of variants). There was no change in body image, VAS, ODI, or short-form McGill scores by 2 years' follow-up. Parents and patients perceived scoliosis problems to be less by 2 years' follow-up (P < 0.0005, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test). The preoperative surface asymmetry score correlated with the patients' grading of their rib-hump (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Back pain incidence was higher than reported for healthy adolescents. Oswestry Disability Index was within normal adult limits. Pain varied by curve type, related to the maximum angle of trunk inclination and the maximum apical vertebral translation. After surgery, back pain and ODI were unchanged, but concerns regarding scoliosis were reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131715     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

1.  How Common Is Back Pain and What Biopsychosocial Factors Are Associated With Back Pain in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Arnold Y L Wong; Dino Samartzis; Prudence W H Cheung; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Back pain in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: epidemiological study for 43,630 pupils in Niigata City, Japan.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Sato; Toru Hirano; Takui Ito; Osamu Morita; Ren Kikuchi; Naoto Endo; Naohito Tanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does patient perception of shoulder balance correlate with clinical balance?

Authors:  Antonia Matamalas; Juan Bagó; Elisabetta D'Agata; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Shallu Sharma; Cody Eric Bünger; Thomas Andersen; Haolin Sun; Chunsen Wu; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Low back pain after spinal fusion and Harrington instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Thomas Niemeyer; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Sarah Grieb; Jürgen Schaefer; Henry Halm; Torsten Kluba
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Do vertebral derotation techniques offer better outcomes compared to traditional methods in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Paul R P Rushton; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Validity and reliability of photographic measures to evaluate waistline asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Antonia Matamalas; Juan Bagó; Elisabetta D Agata; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Reliability of trunk shape measurements based on 3-D surface reconstructions.

Authors:  Valérie Pazos; Farida Cheriet; Jean Danserau; Janet Ronsky; Ronald F Zernicke; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Pain and disability correlated with disc degeneration via magnetic resonance imaging in scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; William J Mullin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Prospective Assessment of Scoliosis-Related Anxiety and Impression of Trunk Deformity in Female Adolescents Under Brace Treatment.

Authors:  Maciej Glowacki; Ewa Misterska; Katarzyna Adamczyk; Joanna Latuszewska
Journal:  J Dev Phys Disabil       Date:  2012-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.