Literature DB >> 26975793

Biomechanical effect of the configuration of screw hole style on locking plate fixation in proximal humerus fracture with a simulated gap: A finite element analysis.

Ya-Kui Zhang1, Hung-Wen Wei2, Kang-Ping Lin3, Wen-Chuan Chen4, Cheng-Lun Tsai5, Kun-Jhih Lin6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures is a commonly used device. Recently, plate breakages were continuously reported that the implants all have a mixture of holes allowing placement of both locking and non-locking screws (so-called combi plates). In commercialized proximal humeral plates, there still are two screw hole styles included "locking and dynamic holes separated" and "locking hole only" configurations. It is important to understand the biomechanical effect of different screw hole style on the stress distribution in bone plate.
METHODS: Finite element method was employed to conduct a computational investigation. Three proximal humeral plate models with different screw hole configurations were reconstructed depended upon an identical commercialized implant. A three-dimensional model of a humerus was created using process of thresholding based on the grayscale values of the CT scanning of an intact humerus. A "virtual" subcapital osteotomy was performed. Simulations were performed under an increasing axial load. The von Mises stresses around the screw holes of the plate shaft, the construct stiffness and the directional displacement within the fracture gap were calculated for comparison.
RESULTS: The mean value of the peak von Mises stresses around the screw holes in the plate shaft was the highest for combi hole design while it was smallest for the locking and dynamic holes separated design. The stiffness of the plate-bone construct was 15% higher in the locking screw only design (132.6N/mm) compared with the combi design (115.0N/mm), and it was 4% higher than the combi design for the locking and dynamic holes separated design (119.5N/mm). The displacement within the fracture gap was greatest in the combi hole design, whereas it was smallest for the locking hole only design.
CONCLUSIONS: The computed results provide a possible explanation for the breakages of combi plates revealed in clinical reports. The locking and dynamic holes separated design may be a better configuration to reduce the risk of plate fracture.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone fracture; Combi-hole; Finite element method; Plate breakage; Stress concentration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26975793     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

1.  Numerical investigation of fracture impaction in proximal humeral fracture fixation with locking plate and intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Yen-Nien Chen; Chih-Wei Chang; Chia-Wei Lin; Chih-Wei Wang; Yao-Te Peng; Chih-Han Chang; Chun-Ting Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The effect of long calcar screws on the primary stability of 3-part, varus impacted proximal humeral fractures compared to short calcar screws: a real fracture simulation study.

Authors:  Nadine Ott; Michael Hackl; Andreas Prescher; Martin Scaal; Fabian Lanzerath; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Role of Additional Inferomedial Supporting Screws in Osteoporotic 3-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture: Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Hyojune Kim; Wonhee Lee; SeungHyun Choi; Erica Kholinne; Euisop Lee; Wael Mohammed Alzahrani; Kyoung Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon; Shinseok Kim
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-04

Review 4.  Biomechanical analysis of plate systems for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ali Jabran; Chris Peach; Lei Ren
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Finite Element- and Design of Experiment-Derived Optimization of Screw Configurations and a Locking Plate for Internal Fixation System.

Authors:  Wei Sheng; Aimin Ji; Runxin Fang; Gang He; Changsheng Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 6.  Experimental testing of fracture fixation plates: A review.

Authors:  Shiling Zhang; Dharmesh Patel; Mark Brady; Sherri Gambill; Kanthan Theivendran; Subodh Deshmukh; John Swadener; Sarah Junaid; Laura Jane Leslie
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Direct electromagnetic coupling to determine diagnostic bone fracture stiffness.

Authors:  Jakob G Wolynski; Milan M Ilić; Kevin M Labus; Branislav M Notaroš; Christian M Puttlitz; Kirk C McGilvray
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-05

Review 8.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Mirijam Müller; Michael Werner; Niels Hammer; Christoph Josten; Pierre Hepp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.