| Literature DB >> 26975345 |
Seong Hyuk Lee1,2, Min-Sik Kim3, Jae-Hak Lee1, Tae Wan Kim1,2, Seung Seob Bae1, Sung-Mok Lee1, Hae Chang Jung1,2, Tae-Jun Yang1, Ae Ran Choi1, Yong-Jun Cho4, Jung-Hyun Lee1,2, Kae Kyoung Kwon1,2, Hyun Sook Lee1,2, Sung Gyun Kang1,2.
Abstract
The hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 can grow and produce H2 on carbon monoxide (CO) and its H2 production rates have been improved through metabolic engineering. In this study, we applied adaptive evolution to enhance H2 productivity. After over 150 serial transfers onto CO medium, cell density, CO consumption rate and H2 production rate increased. The underlying mechanism for those physiological changes could be explained by using multi-omics approaches including genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses. A putative transcriptional regulator was newly identified to regulate the expression levels of genes related to CO oxidation. Transcriptome analysis revealed significant changes in the transcript levels of genes belonging to the categories of transcription, translation and energy metabolism. Our study presents the first genome-scale methylation pattern of hyperthermophilic archaea. Adaptive evolution led to highly enhanced H2 productivity at high CO flow rates using synthesis gas produced from coal gasification.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26975345 PMCID: PMC4791640 DOI: 10.1038/srep22896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Physiological changes in T. onnurineus NA1 following serial transfers into fresh MM1 medium containing 100% CO.
After 2 (closed circle), 12 (open circle), 32 (closed inverted triangle), 62 (open triangle), 102 (closed square), 122 (open square) and 156 (closed diamond) transfers, (a) cell density (expressed as optical density at 600 nm) was determined at the indicated timepoints. (b) H2 production rates and (c) CO consumption rates were determined during exponential phase. All experiments were conducted independently in duplicate.
Mutations found in the 156 T strain.
| Locus_tag | Genome position | Timeline of the mutation | Mutation type | Codon change | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TON_0536–0541 | 490749–496535 | after 12th transfer | 5786-bp deletion | frame shift | cytosolic NiFe-hydrogenase, formate transporter, formate dehydrogenase, iron-sulfur binding proteins |
| TON_0820 | 760634 | after 12th transfer | substitution | Leu to Arg | aromatic amino acid permease |
| TON_1525 | 1400830 | after 12th transfer | substitution | Thr to Ile | putative transcriptional regulator |
| TON_1544 | 1420154 | after 62nd transfer | substitution | Pro to Leu | membrane protein |
| TON_0982 | 906462 | after 32nd transfer | T insertion | frame shift | aminotransferase |
| TON_1548 | 1422235 | after 102nd transfer | T deletion | frame shift | hypothetical protein |
| TON_1664 | 1527982 | after 156th transfer | A deletion | frame shift | cation transporter |
| TON_1694 | 1559247 | after 102nd transfer | 12-bp insertion | frame shift | membrane-associated metalloprotease |
| TON_0544 | 499427–499765 | after 156th transfer | 338-bp deletion | frame shift | alcohol dehydrogenase |
| TON_1475–1476 | 1351559–1351609 | after 62nd transfer | 51-bp deletion | – | intergenic region |
aAll mutations were confirmed by PCR verification and Sanger sequencing.
Figure 2Archaeal COG classification of differentially expressed genes and changes in the expression levels of genes in the CODH gene cluster during adaptation.
(a) The following COG categories were included: J, Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; K, Transcription; L, Replication, recombination and repair; B, Chromatin structure and dynamics; D, Cell cycle control, cell division and chromosome partitioning; V, Defense mechanisms; T, Signal transduction mechanisms; M, Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N, Cell motility; U, Intracellular trafficking, secretion and vesicular transport; O, Posttranslational modification, protein turnover and chaperones; C, Energy production and conversion; G, Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; E, Amino acid transport and metabolism; F, Nucleotide transport and metabolism; H, Coenzyme transport and metabolism; I, Lipid transport and metabolism; P, Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport and catabolism; A, RNA processing and modification. The numbers of upregulated genes and downregulated genes are indicated as bars in the right and left panels of the histogram, respectively. (b) RNA-seq analysis of genes encoding CODH (TON_1018) (closed circle), Mch (TON_1023) (open circle) and Mnh (TON_1031) (closed inverted triangle). (c) Western blot analysis of TON_1018 (67.7 kDa) and TON_1023 (61.7 kDa). RT-qPCR analysis of mRNA abundance of TON_1018 (d), TON_1023 (e) and TON_1031 (f). Error bars indicate standard deviations from duplicate experiments. FPKM, Fragments per kilobase per million mapped reads; M, molecular mass marker.
Figure 3Comparison of the methylation profiles of adenine and cytosine residues between the 2T and 156T strains.
Only positions with p-values lower than 10−4 (score ≤ 40) and larger than 25 (coverage > 25) were selected as modified bases. The locations of methylated adenines within GTCGAm6AC (a), GTATAm6AC (b) and GTCTAm6AC (c) and of methylated cytosine, m4C (d), are displayed in the 2 T (left panel) and 156 T genomes (right panel) as bars. The length of each bar represents the level of confidence in the methylation (−10*log[P-value]). Methylations in the + and − strands are indicated by red and blue bars, respectively. In the outermost circles, the locations dividing the genome into 6 equal parts are indicated as ticks.
Figure 4The effects of the T55I mutation in TON_1525 and the L65R mutation in TON_0820.
(a) CO consumption was analyzed by myoglobin assay for wild-type (WT) (closed circle), MC11 (open circle) and 156T (closed inverted triangle) strains. (b) RT-qPCR analysis of TON_1018, TON_1023 and TON_1031 in WT (black bar) and MC11 (gray bar) strains. (c) Western blot analysis of TON_1018 (67.7 kDa) and TON_1023 (61.7 kDa) in WT and MC11 strains. (d) Comparison of cell density (expressed as optical density at 600 nm) and (e) H2 production of the TON_0820 mutants in comparison with the WT and 156T strains. Error bars indicate the standard deviations of independent triplicate (a,b) or duplicate (d,e) experiments.
Comparison of H2 production rates between wild-type and mutant strains of T. onnurineus NA1.
| Organism | Strategy | H2 production rate (mmol l−1 h−1) | Specific H2 production rate (mmol g−1 h−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 156T | Evolutionary engineering | 220.8c | 334.6c | This study |
| ΔCorR/ | Transcriptional regulator engineering | 191.9a | 249.6a | 15 |
| KS0510 | Promoter engineering | 155.1b | 245.1b | 16 |
| MC01 | Promoter engineering | 123.5b | 194.7b | 14 |
| wild-type | – | 32.9a | 151.3a | 14 |
a–c100% CO was continuously fed at flow rates of 240 (MC01 and KS0510 strains), 400 (wild-type and ΔCorR/corQR↑ strains) or 800 ml min−1 (156T strain).