Literature DB >> 26975040

Mixed and Ambiguous Endometrial Carcinomas: A Heterogenous Group of Tumors With Different Clinicopathologic and Molecular Genetic Features.

Iñigo Espinosa1, Emanuela D'Angelo, José Palacios, Jaime Prat.   

Abstract

Besides endometrioid, serous, and clear cell carcinomas, there are endometrial carcinomas exhibiting mixed and ambiguous morphologic features. We have analyzed the immunophenotype (p53, p16, β-catenin, ER, HNF-1B, MLH1, and Ki-67) and mutational status (PTEN, KRAS, PIK3CA, and POLE) of 7 mixed carcinomas and 13 ambiguous carcinomas, all of them classified initially as mixed carcinomas. Only 2 of the 7 (28%) mixed carcinomas showed different immunophenotypes in different components. All but 2 tumors (5/7, 71%) overexpressed p53 and p16 and were negative for ER. Both carcinomas (2/7, 28%) showed a prominent micropapillary component that resembled an ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma and merged with villoglandular endometrioid carcinoma. The ambiguous carcinomas exhibited glandular architecture, high nuclear grade, and overlapping features of endometrioid and serous carcinomas. All tumors overexpressed p53 and p16, and the majority of cases (12/13, 92%) were negative for ER. KRAS mutations were identified in 3 of 7 (42%) mixed carcinomas, including the 2 cases with a "low-grade" serous-like component. PIK3CA mutations occurred in 2 (2/13, 15%) ambiguous carcinomas and PTEN mutations in 1 (1/7, 14%) mixed and 1 (1/13, 8%) ambiguous carcinoma. POLE exonuclease domain mutations were encountered in a case of mixed undifferentiated and well-differentiated (dedifferentiated) carcinoma. Two of the 7 (29%) mixed endometrial carcinomas and 5 of the 13 (38%) ambiguous carcinomas had extended beyond the pelvis (stages III and IV). Two of the 7 (29%) patients with mixed endometrial carcinoma and 6 of 12 (50%) patients with ambiguous endometrial carcinoma were alive with disease or had died of tumor. Our results show that, biologically, many so-called mixed carcinomas represent serous carcinomas with ambiguous morphology. Our series include 2 true mixed endometrial carcinomas with a "low-grade serous"-like component, microcystic, elongated, or fragmented features, KRAS mutations, and aggressive behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26975040     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  9 in total

1.  Molecular genetic heterogeneity in undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Juan M Rosa-Rosa; Susanna Leskelä; Eva Cristóbal-Lana; Almudena Santón; Ma Ángeles López-García; Gloria Muñoz; Belen Pérez-Mies; Michele Biscuola; Jaime Prat; Oliva Esther; Robert A Soslow; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Jose Palacios
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Are the uterine serous carcinomas underdiagnosed? Histomorphologic and immunohistochemical correlates and clinical follow up in high-grade endometrial carcinomas initially diagnosed as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma.

Authors:  Shaomin Hu; Jeff L Hinson; Rahul Matnani; Michael L Cibull; Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Effect of High-fat Diet-induced Disorders on Rat with Endometrial Hyperplasia and Adiponectin System in Circulation and Uterus.

Authors:  Chen-Guang Shang; Zhao-Hui Liu; Xiao-Hui Wang; Zong-Hao Feng; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Limited impact of intratumour heterogeneity on molecular risk assignment in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Manouk van Esterik; Inge C Van Gool; Cor D de Kroon; Remi A Nout; Carien L Creutzberg; Vincent T H B M Smit; Tjalling Bosse; Ellen Stelloo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11

Review 5.  Checkpoint inhibitors in endometrial cancer: preclinical rationale and clinical activity.

Authors:  Gloria Mittica; Eleonora Ghisoni; Gaia Giannone; Massimo Aglietta; Sofia Genta; Giorgio Valabrega
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-08

6.  Intratumor genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution to decode endometrial cancer progression.

Authors:  Alba Mota; Sara S Oltra; Pier Selenica; Cristian P Moiola; Carlos Casas-Arozamena; Carlos López-Gil; Eva Diaz; Sonia Gatius; María Ruiz-Miro; Ana Calvo; Alejandro Rojo-Sebastián; Pablo Hurtado; Roberto Piñeiro; Eva Colas; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Laura Muinelo-Romay; Miguel Abal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Britta Weigelt; Gema Moreno-Bueno
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  TCGA Molecular Prognostic Groups of Endometrial Carcinoma: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Damiano Arciuolo; Antonio Travaglino; Antonio Raffone; Diego Raimondo; Angela Santoro; Daniela Russo; Silvia Varricchio; Paolo Casadio; Frediano Inzani; Renato Seracchioli; Antonio Mollo; Massimo Mascolo; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 8.  Genomic alterations in gynecological malignancies: histotype-associated driver mutations, molecular subtyping schemes, and tumorigenic mechanisms.

Authors:  Seiichi Mori; Osamu Gotoh; Kazuma Kiyotani; Siew Kee Low
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Germline POLE mutation in a child with hypermutated medulloblastoma and features of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency.

Authors:  Holly Lindsay; Sarah Scollon; Jacquelyn Reuther; Horatiu Voicu; Surya P Rednam; Frank Y Lin; Kevin E Fisher; Murali Chintagumpala; Adekunle M Adesina; D Will Parsons; Sharon E Plon; Angshumoy Roy
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2019-10-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.