CONTEXT: Younger age has been hypothesized to be a risk factor for prolonged recovery after sport-related concussion, yet few studies have directly evaluated age differences in acute recovery. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical recovery patterns for high school and collegiate athletes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Large, multicenter prospective sample collected from 1999-2003 in a sports medicine setting. SUBJECTS: Concussed athletes (n = 621; 545 males and 76 females) and uninjured controls (n = 150) participating in high school and collegiate contact and collision sports (79% in football, 15.7% in soccer, and the remainder in lacrosse or ice hockey). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants underwent evaluation of symptoms (Graded Symptom Checklist), cognition (Standardized Assessment of Concussion, paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests), and postural stability (Balance Error Scoring System). Athletes were evaluated preinjury and followed serially at several time points after concussive injury: immediately, 3 hours postinjury, and at days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 45 or 90 (with neuropsychological measures administered at baseline and 3 postinjury time points). RESULTS: Comparisons of concussed high school and collegiate athletes with uninjured controls suggested that high school athletes took 1 to 2 days longer to recover on a cognitive (Standardized Assessment of Concussion) measure. Comparisons with the control group on other measures (symptoms, balance) as well as direct comparisons between concussed high school and collegiate samples revealed no differences in the recovery courses between the high school and collegiate groups on any measure. Group-level recovery occurred at or before 7 days postinjury on all assessment metrics. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest no clinically significant age differences exist in recovery after sport-related concussion, and therefore, separate injury-management protocols are not needed for high school and collegiate athletes.
CONTEXT: Younger age has been hypothesized to be a risk factor for prolonged recovery after sport-related concussion, yet few studies have directly evaluated age differences in acute recovery. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical recovery patterns for high school and collegiate athletes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Large, multicenter prospective sample collected from 1999-2003 in a sports medicine setting. SUBJECTS: Concussed athletes (n = 621; 545 males and 76 females) and uninjured controls (n = 150) participating in high school and collegiate contact and collision sports (79% in football, 15.7% in soccer, and the remainder in lacrosse or ice hockey). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants underwent evaluation of symptoms (Graded Symptom Checklist), cognition (Standardized Assessment of Concussion, paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests), and postural stability (Balance Error Scoring System). Athletes were evaluated preinjury and followed serially at several time points after concussive injury: immediately, 3 hours postinjury, and at days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 45 or 90 (with neuropsychological measures administered at baseline and 3 postinjury time points). RESULTS: Comparisons of concussed high school and collegiate athletes with uninjured controls suggested that high school athletes took 1 to 2 days longer to recover on a cognitive (Standardized Assessment of Concussion) measure. Comparisons with the control group on other measures (symptoms, balance) as well as direct comparisons between concussed high school and collegiate samples revealed no differences in the recovery courses between the high school and collegiate groups on any measure. Group-level recovery occurred at or before 7 days postinjury on all assessment metrics. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest no clinically significant age differences exist in recovery after sport-related concussion, and therefore, separate injury-management protocols are not needed for high school and collegiate athletes.
Authors: Christopher Randolph; Scott Millis; William B Barr; Michael McCrea; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Thomas A Hammeke; James P Kelly Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Danny George Thomas; Jennifer N Apps; Raymond G Hoffmann; Michael McCrea; Thomas Hammeke Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Paul McCrory; Willem Meeuwisse; Mark Aubry; Bob Cantu; Jiri Dvorak; Ruben J Echemendia; Lars Engebretsen; Karen Johnston; Jeffrey S Kutcher; Martin Raftery; Allen Sills; Brian W Benson; Gavin A Davis; Richard G Ellenbogen; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Stanley A Herring; Grant Iverson; Barry D Jordan; James Kissick; Michael McCrea; Andrew S McIntosh; David L Maddocks; Michael Makdissi; Laura Purcell; Margot Putukian; Michael Turner; Kathryn Schneider; Charles H Tator Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Mary R Prasad; Larry Kramer; Charles S Cox; James Baumgartner; Stephen Fletcher; Donna Mendez; Marcia Barnes; Xiaoling Zhang; Paul Swank Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Lauren A Pierpoint; Andrew E Lincoln; Nina Walker; Shane V Caswell; Dustin W Currie; Sarah B Knowles; Erin B Wasserman; Thomas P Dompier; R Dawn Comstock; Stephen W Marshall; Zachary Y Kerr Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Elizabeth F Teel; Stephen W Marshall; Viswanathan Shankar; Michael McCrea; Kevin M Guskiewicz Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Mohammad Nadir Haider; John J Leddy; Sonja Pavlesen; Melissa Kluczynski; John G Baker; Jeffrey C Miecznikowski; Barry S Willer Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2017-07-22 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: C Elaine Little; Carolyn Emery; Stephen H Scott; Willem Meeuwisse; Luz Palacios-Derflingher; Sean P Dukelow Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Benjamin L Brett; Andrew W Kuhn; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Zachary Y Kerr; Christopher M Bonfield; Gary S Solomon; Scott L Zuckerman Journal: Sports Med Open Date: 2018-01-31