Literature DB >> 26973853

PINK1, cancer and neurodegeneration.

Ciara H O'Flanagan1, Vanessa A Morais1, Cora O'Neill1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Parkinson disease; carcinogenesis; cell cycle checkpoints; mitochondrial degradation; mitochondrial dynamics

Year:  2016        PMID: 26973853      PMCID: PMC4751909          DOI: 10.18632/oncoscience.284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoscience        ISSN: 2331-4737


× No keyword cloud information.
Cancer and neurodegeneration are two age-related diseases that arise from aberrant signaling in similar cellular systems, those that balance survival and death. Thus, deregulated molecular processes such as DNA damage repair, intracellular energy balance, and key signal transduction systems, including the PI3-kinase/Akt axis can promote tumorigenesis and induce neurodegeneration [1]. Epidemiological studies support this cross-talk between cancer and neurodegeneration, indicating a reduced risk of certain cancers in patients diagnosed with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD) [2]. In addition, several of the genes discovered to cause inherited PD, including PTEN induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) have been described to have oncogenic or tumor suppressor properties [3]. In a recent study we focused on the function of PINK1 in cancer cell biology, and discovered a novel function for PINK1 as a positive regulator of cell cycle progression that can promote cancer-associated phenotypes [4]. PINK1 is ubiquitously expressed and was named due to induction by the tumor suppressor PTEN in cancer cells, drawing attention to its putative role in cancer from the first instance. Several mechanistic links between PINK1, PTEN and the PI3-kinase/Akt signaling axis that PTEN inhibits were subsequently highlighted, indicating PINK1 is both regulated by and regulates PI3-kinase/Akt signaling [5]. Interlinked with this, in an as yet undefined manner, PINK1 is best described as a major mitochondrial quality control protein, rudimentary to cell survival due to its regulatory role in the triad of mitochondrial fission, fusion and mitophagy as well as mitochondrial bioenergetics. Although somewhat understudied, the cell cycle and mitochondrial quality control are intrinsically coupled [6]. Mitochondria must divide and undergo fission during mitosis to allow equal distribution of mitochondria to daughter cells, also permitting clearance of damaged mitochondria via mitophagy. Conversely, mitochondrial fusion occurs during the transition from mitosis to G1 following cytokinesis, and can promote stress resistance and cell cycle exit in G0. Our findings show for the first time that regulation of mitochondrial fission to fusion transitions by PINK1 is critical for cell cycle progression at G2/M and G0/G1 checkpoints necessary for cell division, growth and stress resistance, in particular in cancer biology. In line with this, PINK1 deletion reduced proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasive potential in several cell model systems. In further detail, PINK1-deficiency induced multinucleation and cell cycle arrest during G2/M and resulted in a reduced ability to exit the cell cycle following serum withdrawal. This was PINK1 kinase dependent and rescued by re-introduction of human PINK1. The cell cycle changes induced by PINK1 deletion where mechanistically linked to excessive mitochondrial fission, and increased expression and activation of the master mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1). siRNA knockdown of Drp1 and restoration of mitochondrial fusion in PINK1-deficient cells caused a reduced multi-nucleation. Together this indicates that mitotic arrest with an inability to complete cytokinesis in cells without PINK1 is due to excessive mitochondrial fission, and an inability to induce fusion following nuclear separation and prior to cytokinesis. Significant cell cycle marker changes were co-existent with this defect including failure to increase cyclin D1, indicative of mitotic arrest induced by PINK1 deletion. PINK1 has been previously highlighted as a potential target for cancer therapy and been shown to sensitize cancer cells to DNA damaging agents and chemotherapeutic drugs [7]. Our findings show that PINK1 inhibition constrains proliferation, halting the cell just before division, the point at which many of these agents target. PINK1 may therefore be a direct target to block the cell cycle in cancer or for combination therapies to ‘prime’ cancer cells for treatment with other mitosis-targeting drugs. Conversely, the inability of cells to effectively divide in the absence of PINK1 has the potential to increased chromosomal aberrations, genetic instability and aneuploidy that could lead to cancer in some cell types. This context dependent pro- and antitumorigenic properties depending on cell type, is emerging for many genes with oncogenic potential. The significance of PINK1's involvement in cell cycle regulation is important not only in cancer whereby cells are continually dividing, but also in neuronal biology, as abortive cell cycle re-entry in terminally differentiated, post-mitotic neurons has been suggested to be a key mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases [3]. While much is known about the function of PINK1 in mitochondrial biology and also to a lesser but growing extent, in PI3-kinase/Akt signalling, the exact mechanism through which loss of function of PINK1 causes PD is still unknown. This new function of PINK1 as a regulator of the cell cycle draws attention to the function of PINK1, via mitochondrial quality control, in both cell division, and cell differentiation programs, that underlie cancer and adult neuronal phenotypes. These findings therefore add another piece towards solving the larger puzzle of PINK1 function in neuronal systems and highlight the potential of PINK1 as a target in future anti-cancer therapies.
  7 in total

1.  The Parkinson's gene PINK1 regulates cell cycle progression and promotes cancer-associated phenotypes.

Authors:  C H O'Flanagan; V A Morais; W Wurst; B De Strooper; C O'Neill
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Parkinson's disease and cancer: the unexplored connection.

Authors:  Ken Garber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  PINK1 signalling in cancer biology.

Authors:  Ciara H O'Flanagan; Cora O'Neill
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-10-23

Review 4.  Inverse cancer comorbidity: a serendipitous opportunity to gain insight into CNS disorders.

Authors:  Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; John L Rubenstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Sensitized RNAi screen of human kinases and phosphatases identifies new regulators of apoptosis and chemoresistance.

Authors:  Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Leon O Murphy; John Blenis
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Coupling mitochondrial and cell division.

Authors:  Koji Yamano; Richard J Youle
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 7.  Parkinson's disease and cancer: two wars, one front.

Authors:  Michael J Devine; Hélène Plun-Favreau; Nicholas W Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 60.716

  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Biological and Clinical Implications of Comorbidities in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Jose A Santiago; Virginie Bottero; Judith A Potashkin
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  The Expression Patterns of BECN1, LAMP2, and PINK1 Genes in Colorectal Cancer Are Potentially Regulated by Micrornas and CpG Islands: An In Silico Study.

Authors:  Martyna Bednarczyk; Edyta Fatyga; Sylwia Dzięgielewska-Gęsiak; Dariusz Waniczek; Beniamin Grabarek; Nikola Zmarzły; Grażyna Janikowska; Małgorzata Muc-Wierzgoń
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  PINK1 Protects against Staurosporine-Induced Apoptosis by Interacting with Beclin1 and Impairing Its Pro-Apoptotic Cleavage.

Authors:  Francesco Brunelli; Liliana Torosantucci; Vania Gelmetti; Davide Franzone; Anne Grünewald; Rejko Krüger; Giuseppe Arena; Enza Maria Valente
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 4.  Genes involved in the regulation of different types of autophagy and their participation in cancer pathogenesis.

Authors:  Martyna Bednarczyk; Nikola Zmarzły; Beniamin Grabarek; Urszula Mazurek; Małgorzata Muc-Wierzgoń
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-09-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.