AIM: To identify the prognostic value of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: A search was performed for relevant publications in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. The pooled effects were calculated from the available information to identify the relationship between HBV or HCV infection and the prognosis and clinicopathological features. The χ(2) and I (2) tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by a fixed-effects model, if no heterogeneity existed. If there was heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied. RESULTS: In total, 14 studies involving 2842 cases were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The patients with HBV infection presented better overall and disease-free survival, and the pooled HRs were significant at 0.76 (95%CI: 0.70-0.83) and 0.78 (95%CI: 0.66-0.94), respectively. Additionally, our study revealed that HCV infection was correlated with shortened overall survival in comparison with the control group (HR = 2.64, 95%CI: 1.77-3.93). We also found that HBV infection occurred more frequently in male patients [odds ratio (OR) = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.06-3.44] and was correlated with higher levels of serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (OR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.11-3.35; OR = 3.86, 95%CI: 2.58-5.78) and a lower level of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (OR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.34-0.65). Moreover, HBV infection was associated with cirrhosis (OR = 6.44, 95%CI: 4.33-9.56), a higher proportion of capsule formation (OR = 6.04, 95%CI: 3.56-10.26), and a lower rate of lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.25-0.58). No significant publication bias was seen in any of the enrolled studies. CONCLUSION: HBV infection may indicate a favorable prognosis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, while HCV infection suggests a poor prognosis.
AIM: To identify the prognostic value of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: A search was performed for relevant publications in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. The pooled effects were calculated from the available information to identify the relationship between HBV or HCV infection and the prognosis and clinicopathological features. The χ(2) and I (2) tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by a fixed-effects model, if no heterogeneity existed. If there was heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied. RESULTS: In total, 14 studies involving 2842 cases were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The patients with HBV infection presented better overall and disease-free survival, and the pooled HRs were significant at 0.76 (95%CI: 0.70-0.83) and 0.78 (95%CI: 0.66-0.94), respectively. Additionally, our study revealed that HCV infection was correlated with shortened overall survival in comparison with the control group (HR = 2.64, 95%CI: 1.77-3.93). We also found that HBV infection occurred more frequently in male patients [odds ratio (OR) = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.06-3.44] and was correlated with higher levels of serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (OR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.11-3.35; OR = 3.86, 95%CI: 2.58-5.78) and a lower level of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (OR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.34-0.65). Moreover, HBV infection was associated with cirrhosis (OR = 6.44, 95%CI: 4.33-9.56), a higher proportion of capsule formation (OR = 6.04, 95%CI: 3.56-10.26), and a lower rate of lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.25-0.58). No significant publication bias was seen in any of the enrolled studies. CONCLUSION:HBV infection may indicate a favorable prognosis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, while HCV infection suggests a poor prognosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical features; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C virus; Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; Prognosis
Authors: Tania M Welzel; Barry I Graubard; Hashem B El-Serag; Yasser H Shaib; Ann W Hsing; Jessica A Davila; Katherine A McGlynn Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Harrys A Torres; Terri Lynn Shigle; Nassim Hammoudi; James T Link; Felipe Samaniego; Ahmed Kaseb; Vincent Mallet Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: C Peraldo-Neia; P Ostano; G Cavalloni; Y Pignochino; D Sangiolo; L De Cecco; E Marchesi; D Ribero; A Scarpa; A M De Rose; A Giuliani; F Calise; C Raggi; P Invernizzi; M Aglietta; G Chiorino; F Leone Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Jung Woong Seo; Byung Soo Kwan; Young Koog Cheon; Tae Yoon Lee; Chan Sup Shim; So Young Kwon; Won Hyeok Choe; Byung Chul Yoo; Jeong Min Yoon; Jung Hoon Lee Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 2.884