Literature DB >> 31916422

Prognostic impact of hepatitis B or C on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Jung Woong Seo1, Byung Soo Kwan1, Young Koog Cheon1, Tae Yoon Lee1, Chan Sup Shim1, So Young Kwon1, Won Hyeok Choe1, Byung Chul Yoo1, Jeong Min Yoon1, Jung Hoon Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second-most common primary liver malignancy, arising from the peripheral intrahepatic bile duct epithelium. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) may be involved in the development of ICC. We explored the prognostic value of hepatitis virus infection, as well as other prognostic factors affecting survival in patients with ICC.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with ICC between August 2005 and December 2018 at Konkuk University Medical Center. We identified a total of 131 patients with ICC. Overall survival rates of patients with and without hepatitis were determined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to estimate factors influencing survival outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 17.6% (23/131) of patients were positive for HBV or HCV. Hepatitis B positive ICC patients were significantly younger with higher albumin and higher α-fetoprotein than those without hepatitis viral infections. The median survival of hepatitis-positive and hepatitis-negative groups was 280 and 213 days, respectively. Survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.279). Multivariate analyses indicated that lower serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) (p < 0.001), lower T stage (p = 0.042), the absence of lymph-node metastasis (p = 0.043), and receiving curative surgery (p = 0.033) were independent predictors of better outcomes.
CONCLUSION: While hepatitis influenced a number of clinical features in ICC patients, it did not affect survival rate. Prognostic factors influencing survival outcomes with ICC were CA 19-9 level, T stage, the presence of lymph node metastasis, and curative surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C virus; Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; Survival rate

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31916422      PMCID: PMC7214366          DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2018.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Intern Med        ISSN: 1226-3303            Impact factor:   2.884


INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the second-most common primary hepatic tumor (after hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]), accounts for approximately 3% of all gastrointestinal tumors and 10% to 15% of primary liver malignancies [1,2]. The incidence and mortality rates of ICC have been increasing globally in recent decades. ICC is a lethal malignancy, with a median survival of 6.5 months from the time of diagnosis in untreated patients [3]. However, the etiology of cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear. The primary risk factor for ICC is primary sclerosing cholangitis. Obesity, inflammatory conditions of the biliary tract, ulcerative colitis, smoking, Caroli’s disease, exposure to radiopaque medium thorium dioxide (Thorotrast, Testagar & Co. Inc., Detroit, MI, USA), and diabetes have also been proposed as risk factors [1,3]. Hepatitis viruses, including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), are causative agents of HCC. Recent studies have shown that both HBV and HCV infections can cause ICC [4,5], which may explain its increasing incidence. Regardless of etiology, surgical resection offers the only prospect of cure; however, only a small percentage of patients with ICC have resectable cancer at the time of diagnosis. Given the increasing incidence of ICC, its poor prognosis, and the lack of adequate treatment options, further studies exploring its risk factors, prognostic indicators, and outcomes are required. While several recent studies have indicated that HBV and HCV infections have prognostic significance for ICC [6,7], the prognostic impact of such infections remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study of all patients with ICC treated between 2005 and 2018 at a single institution to evaluate the prognostic value of hepatitis virus infection status and to identify other prognostic factors that affect survival in patients with ICC.

METHODS

Patients

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with ICC between August 2005 and December 2018 at Konkuk University Medical Center. All patients with an intrahepatic mass were evaluated for operability by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Ultrasound-guided biopsies were performed to confirm the pathologic diagnosis when patients were assessed with unresectable ICC by radiologic examination. Patients with HCC-cholangiocarcinoma mixed type, intraductal papillary biliary neoplasm, periductal infiltrative cholangiocarcinoma, or intraductal growing type were excluded. Only the mass-forming type was included. Patients with extrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor, or sarcoma were excluded. Serologic tests were performed for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HCV, indicators of liver function, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and α-fetoprotein (AFP) level. Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of ICC was performed according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems. Surgical procedures were divided into major and minor resections. Major resection included hemihepatectomy and central bisectionectomy, while minor resection included sectionectomy and segmentectomy. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Konkuk University Medical Center (KUH 1010778). Written informed consent by the patients was waived due to a retrospective nature of our study.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Survival of patients in the study group was measured from the time of diagnosis. The study groups were compared using the chisquare test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test for continuous variables. Overall survival with HBV infection status was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests were used to assess differences. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazards model, with the backward Wald procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 635 patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma during the study period, 131 patients had ICC (Fig. 1). Table 1 describes the clinical features of the patients in the study group. It included 74 males and 57 females, with a mean age of 66.6 ± 11.7 years. Among these, a total of 17.6% (23/131) were positive for either HBsAg (19/23) or anti-HCV (4/23). The distribution among the seven different AJCC stages was as follows: I (14.5%), II (9.9%), III (2.3%), IVa (34.4%), and IVb (38.9%). Of the 131 patients, 37 underwent curative surgery (29.1%). In 16 patients (12.7%), surgery was followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The median overall survival of patients with ICC was 213 days.
Figure 1.

Flow diagram of selection and disposition of patients. KUMC, Konkuk University Medical Center; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study group

VariableValue
Total patients131
Age, yr66.6 ± 11.7
Sex
 Men74 (56.5)
 Female57 (43.5)
Hepatitis
 HBV19 (14.5)
 HCV4 (3.1)
TNM stage
 I19 (14.5)
 II13 (9.9)
 III3 (2.3)
 Iva45 (34.4)
 IVb51 (38.9)
Curative surgery37 (29.1)
Chemotherapy
 Adjuvant16 (12.7)
 Palliative62 (49.2)
Survival, day213 (104.0–440.0)

Values are presented as mean ± SD, number (%), or median (interquartile range).

HBV, hepatitis virus B; HCV, hepatitis virus C; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.

The clinical features of hepatitis-B-associated ICC are listed in Table 2. Hepatitis B-associated ICC patients were significantly younger (6.75 [interquartile range, IQR, 60.5 to 76] vs. 57 [IQR, 52.0 to 64.0], p = 0.002) with higher albumin (3.6 [IQR, 3.3 to 4.0] vs. 3.9 [IQR, 3.4 to 4.3], p = 0.044) and higher AFP (3.0 [IQR, 2.5 to 5.0] vs. 7.0 [IQR, 3.0 to 190.8], p = 0.016) than those without hepatitis. There were no significant differences in other clinical indices, including bilirubin level, CA 19-9 level, or TNM stage. Hepatitis-C-associated ICC patients were not significantly different in clinical indices.
Table 2.

Clinical features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients with hepatitis B virus infection and without hepatitis virus infection

VariableWithout hepatitisWith hepatitis Bp value
Total patients108 (82.4)19 (14.5)
Mean age, yr67.5 (60.5–76.0)57.0 (52.0–64.0)0.002
Sex
 Men6110NS
 Women479
Bilirubin, mg/dL0.7 (0.5–1.1)0.8 (0.6–1.1)NS
Albumin, mg/dL3.6 (3.3–4.0)3.9 (3.4–4.3)0.044
CA 19-9, mg/dL81.1 (16.5–877.6)149.3 (19.5–756.3)NS
AFP, mg/dL3.0 (2.5–5.0)7.0 (3.0–190.8)0.016
CTP score5 (5–6)5 (5–5)NS
TNM stageNS
 I15 (13.9)4 (21.1)
 II10 (9.3)2 (10.5)
 III3 (2.8)0
 IV a37 (34.3)6 (31.6)
 IV b43 (39.8)7 (36.8)
Mean survival, day213 (105–435)302 (96–686)NS
HBV viral load, IU/mL231 (20–409)
Antiviral treatment
 Yes8 (42.1)
 No11 (57.9)

Values are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range).

NS, no statistically significant; CA 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; AFP, α-fetoprotein; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; HBV, hepatitis B virus.

Overall survival rates of ICC patients with and without hepatitis were not significantly different (p = 0.279). In addition, there was no significant difference in overall survival with HBV infection status (p = 0.164) (Fig. 2). Table 3 describes the prognostic factors for survival identified in the study group. In univariate analyses, factors associated with survival included age ≥ 65 years (p = 0.005), albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dL (p = 0.025), CA 19-9 ≥ 100 ng/mL (p < 0.001), T stage (T1–T3) at diagnosis (p < 0.001), presence of lymph node invasion (p < 0.001), presence of metastases at diagnosis (p < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery (p = 0.004) and curative surgery (p < 0.001). The median survival of ICC patients with and without hepatitis was 280 and 213 days, respectively. Survival rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.279). In addition, the median survivals of patients with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and without hepatitis were 302, 128.5, and 213 days, respectively. Survival rates did not differ significantly among the three groups (p = 0.166 vs. p = 0.603). In multivariate analyses, CA 19-9 < 100 ng/mL (p < 0.001), T stage (T1–T3) at diagnosis (p = 0.042), the absence of lymph node invasion (p = 0.043), and curative surgery (p = 0.033) were significant and independent predictors of a more favorable outcome.
Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection status. There are no significant differences in overall survival between the groups with and without HBV infection (p = 0.164).

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with the survival of all patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

VariableNumberMedian survivalUnivariate analysis p valueMultivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)p value
Age, yr
 < 6555302
 ≥ 6566183.50.0051.415 (0.856–2.339)0.176
Hepatitis
 No98213
 Hepatitis B193020.166
 Hepatitis C4128.50.603
Hepatitis B or C
 No98213
 Yes232800.279
CTP score
 < 7100216.5
 ≥ 7211390.570
Albumin, g/dL
 < 3.540119.5
 ≥ 3.5812680.0250.875 (0.522–1.467)0.612
Bilirubin, mg/dL
 < 3.0111217
 ≥ 3.010710.209
CA 19–9, ng/mL
 < 10060291
 ≥ 10055180< 0.0012.378 (1.499–3.773)< 0.001
T stage
 T1–T377338
 T444124< 0.0011.811 (1.022–3.210)0.042
Lymph node
 Negative45386
 Positive76159< 0.0011.756 (1.018–3.027)0.043
Distant metastasis
 No76291
 Yes45122< 0.0011.219 (0.729–2.038)0.449
Adjuvant chemotherapy
 Yes156120.0040.615 (0.230–1.642)0.322
 No105194
Palliative chemotherapy
 Yes60248.50.713
 No60194.5
Curative surgery
 Yes36538< 0.0010.426 (0.194–0.934)0.033
 No84144.5
Tumor size, cm
 < 520538
 ≥ 512561.50.518
Surgical procedure
 Major resection164060.282
 Minor resection16612
Resection margin
 Negative26406
 Positive76120.959
Tumor differentiation
 Well or moderate22579.6
 Poor or un-differentiation101242.30.252
Perineural invasion
 Yes49620.726
 No29518
Portal vein invasion
 Yes52800.379
 No27612
Microvascular invasion
 Yes133770.150
 No19588
Histologic cirrhosis
 Yes4744.50.687
 No29518

Median survival is expressed in days.

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh; CA 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of ICC is increasing, generating clinical interest in improving outcomes and identifying prognostic factors. Recently, many studies have indicated that HBV and HCV infection are statistically associated with ICC [4,5,8]. HBV and HCV infection are endemic in Korea. In our study, 17.6% of patients with ICC (23/131) were positive for HBV or HCV infection. Although we explored the prognostic value of hepatitis virus infection, we found no significant difference in overall survival between ICC patients with and without hepatitis, although some clinical features did differ between the two groups. Cholangiocarcinoma is more common in older patients [9]. ICC typically presents sporadically as a discrete intrahepatic mass in patients over 65 years of age [10]. In our study, the mean age of patients at the time of ICC diagnosis was 66.6 years; in patients with underlying HBV infection, ICC diagnosis occurred at an earlier age, with a mean age at presentation of 57.0 years (p = 0.002) (Table 2). Although these patients were diagnosed at an earlier age, most had metastatic disease or unresectable tumors at the time of diagnosis. This may be due to specific mechanisms induced by hepatitis virus infection, but this remains unclear. In several recent studies, HBV nucleic acid and HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) have been identified in cholangiocarcinoma cells. These findings indicate that hepatitis viruses may induce cholangiocyte proliferation and dysplasia that leads to ICC development [11-14]. AFP is the most common marker for fetal hepatoblasts, hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs), or HCC. This study found that serum AFP levels > 20 ng/mL were present in about 30.4% of hepatitis-positive ICC patients [15]. HBV and HCV cause viral hepatitis and may cause cancer by inducing chronic inflammation in both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, leading to high levels of serum AFP. Recently, two clinical studies implied that both hepatitis-associated ICC and HCC share a common carcinogenesis process and that both arise from HPC [11,15]. In this study, the incidence of AFP > 20 ng/mL was much higher in hepatitis-associated ICC than in ICC patients without hepatitis (30.4% vs. 9.3%). These findings may imply that, during the process of malignant transformation, HPCs retain their ability to produce AFP. Based on gross morphological features, ICC can be classified into three subtypes: mass-forming, periductal-infiltrating, and intraductal. Etiologies involving distinct molecular pathways may be associated with ICC subtypes. For example, ICC associated with hepatolithiasis and Clonorchis sinensis infection nearly always has an intraductal growth pattern [16]. In our study, although six patients were excluded based on exclusion criteria, we found that hepatitis-associated ICC tended to be of the mass-forming type (23/29). As noted above, it has been suggested that hepatitis-associated ICC and HCC share a common disease mechanism. In our study, approximately 75% of patients had TNM stage III or IV and unresectable tumors at the time of diagnosis. Better survival was observed in patients with CA 19-9 < 100 ng/mL, with T stage 1 to 3 at diagnosis, and without lymph node invasion. In addition, curative surgery was better for survival if curative surgical resection was possible. Tumor size, tumor differentiation, anatomical resection, perineural invasion, presence of vascular invasion, and cirrhosis, which have been reported to be associated with prognosis in previous studies, were not statistically significant in our study [17-22]. In conclusion, ICC is associated with a poor prognosis; therefore, an improved understanding of the factors that determine patient outcomes is required. In many recent studies, HBV and HCV are possible risk factors for ICC development. In this study, we did not find a prognostic value for hepatitis virus status in ICC patients; however, patients with hepatitis-associated ICC showed several clinical features that differed from those in patients without hepatitis. The limitations of this study include its small sample size and retrospective nature. Therefore, a larger prospective study is needed to clarify the prognostic role of HBV and HCV infection for ICC. 1. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) may be involved in the development of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). 2. While hepatitis influenced a number of clinical features in ICC patients, it did not affect survival rate. 3. Prognostic factors inf luencing survival outcomes with ICC were carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, T stage, the presence of lymph node metastasis, and curative surgery.
  22 in total

1.  Effect of hepatitis C virus core protein on modulation of cellular proliferation and apoptosis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ru-Fu Chen; Zhi-Hua Li; Sheng-Quan Zou; Ji-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2005-02

Review 2.  Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Annika Bergquist; Erik von Seth
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.043

3.  Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A large-scale retrospective study.

Authors:  Lei Yuan; Xianwu Luo; Xinyuan Lu; Bin Yi; Kaijian Chu; Quanyu Cai; Xiaoqing Jiang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-22

4.  Perineural invasion is a prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Shirai; Tomoki Ebata; Koji Oda; Hideki Nishio; Tetsuro Nagasaka; Yuji Nimura; Masato Nagino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Tian Yang; Mengchao Wu; Feng Shen
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Characteristics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with hepatitis B virus infection: clinicopathologic study of resected tumours.

Authors:  Z-F Wu; N Yang; D-Y Li; H-B Zhang; G-S Yang
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.728

7.  Hepatitis B and C virus infection is a risk factor for the development of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuya Matsumoto; Takumi Onoyama; Soichiro Kawata; Yohei Takeda; Kenichi Harada; Yuichiro Ikebuchi; Masaru Ueki; Norimasa Miura; Kazuo Yashima; Masahiko Koda; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Masanori Endo; Yasushi Horie; Yoshikazu Murawaki
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.271

8.  Hepatitis B virus infection and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Korea: a case-control study.

Authors:  Tae Y Lee; Sang S Lee; Seok W Jung; Seong H Jeon; Sung-Cheol Yun; Hyoung-Chul Oh; Seunghyun Kwon; Sung K Lee; Dong W Seo; Myung-Hwan Kim; Dong J Suh
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Hepatitis viruses infection and risk of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanming Zhou; Yanfang Zhao; Bin Li; Jiyi Huang; Lupeng Wu; Donghui Xu; Jiamei Yang; Jia He
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Viral hepatitis-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma shares common disease processes with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  C H Lee; C J Chang; Y J Lin; C N Yeh; M F Chen; S Y Hsieh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Results of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Resections: a Single-Center Analysis.

Authors:  Kutay Saglam; Yusuf Murat Bag; Zafer Bilen; Burak Isik; Cemalettin Aydin; Sezai Yilmaz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2022-01-06

2.  In vitro and in vivo study of GSK2830371 and RG7388 combination in liver adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chiao-En Wu; Chiao-Ping Chen; Yi-Ru Pan; Shih-Ming Jung; John Wen-Cheng Chang; Jen-Shi Chen; Chun-Nan Yeh; John Lunec
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.942

3.  Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres microspheres for treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tan-Yang Zhou; Guan-Hui Zhou; Yue-Lin Zhang; Chun-Hui Nie; Tong-Yin Zhu; Hong-Liang Wang; Sheng-Qun Chen; Bao-Quan Wang; Zi-Niu Yu; Li-Ming Wu; Shu-Sen Zheng; Jun-Hui Sun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.207

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.