Literature DB >> 26972317

Functional Plasticity in Somatosensory Cortex Supports Motor Learning by Observing.

Heather R McGregor1, Joshua G A Cashaback2, Paul L Gribble3.   

Abstract

An influential idea in neuroscience is that the sensory-motor system is activated when observing the actions of others [1, 2]. This idea has recently been extended to motor learning, in which observation results in sensory-motor plasticity and behavioral changes in both motor and somatosensory domains [3-9]. However, it is unclear how the brain maps visual information onto motor circuits for learning. Here we test the idea that the somatosensory system, and specifically primary somatosensory cortex (S1), plays a role in motor learning by observing. In experiment 1, we applied stimulation to the median nerve to occupy the somatosensory system with unrelated inputs while participants observed a tutor learning to reach in a force field. Stimulation disrupted motor learning by observing in a limb-specific manner. Stimulation delivered to the right arm (the same arm used by the tutor) disrupted learning, whereas left arm stimulation did not. This is consistent with the idea that a somatosensory representation of the observed effector must be available during observation for learning to occur. In experiment 2, we assessed S1 cortical processing before and after observation by measuring somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) associated with median nerve stimulation. SEP amplitudes increased only for participants who observed learning. Moreover, SEPs increased more for participants who exhibited greater motor learning following observation. Taken together, these findings support the idea that motor learning by observing relies on functional plasticity in S1. We propose that visual signals about the movements of others are mapped onto motor circuits for learning via the somatosensory system.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action observation; human; median nerve stimulation; motor learning; primary somatosensory cortex; reaching; somatosensory evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26972317      PMCID: PMC4855525          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  33 in total

1.  Corticocortical connections of visual, sensorimotor, and multimodal processing areas in the parietal lobe of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  J W Lewis; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-12-04       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Somatosensory cortex responses to median nerve stimulation: fMRI effects of current amplitude and selective attention.

Authors:  W H Backes; W H Mess; V van Kranen-Mastenbroek; J P Reulen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Topographic organization of the human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices: comparison of fMRI and MEG findings.

Authors:  C Del Gratta; S Della Penna; A Ferretti; R Franciotti; V Pizzella; A Tartaro; K Torquati; L Bonomo; G L Romani; P M Rossini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Action plans used in action observation.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Modulation of motor cortex excitability by median nerve and digit stimulation.

Authors:  R Chen; B Corwell; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Changes in visual and sensory-motor resting-state functional connectivity support motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Heather R McGregor; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Projection pattern of functional components of thalamic ventrobasal complex on monkey somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  E G Jones; D P Friedman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Topographic organization of the human primary and secondary somatosensory areas: an fMRI study.

Authors:  C Del Gratta; S Della Penna; A Tartaro; A Ferretti; K Torquati; L Bonomo; G L Romani; P M Rossini
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-06-26       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Short-latency components of evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation recorded by intracerebral electrodes in the human pre- and postcentral areas.

Authors:  E Balzamo; P Marquis; P Chauvel; J Régis
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Attention differentially modulates the coupling of fMRI BOLD and evoked potential signal amplitudes in the human somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  O J Arthurs; H Johansen-Berg; P M Matthews; S J Boniface
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Fluid intelligence and working memory support dissociable aspects of learning by physical but not observational practice.

Authors:  Dace Apšvalka; Emily S Cross; Richard Ramsey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-05-14

2.  Functional connectivity between somatosensory and motor brain areas predicts individual differences in motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Heather R McGregor; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Somatosensory perceptual training enhances motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Heather R McGregor; Joshua G A Cashaback; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual feedback therapy for restoration of upper limb function of stroke patients.

Authors:  Mei-Hong Zhu; Ming Zeng; Mei-Fang Shi; Xu-Dong Gu; Fang Shen; Ye-Ping Zheng; Ya-Ping Jia
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2020-04-11

5.  Changes in corticospinal excitability associated with motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Heather R McGregor; Michael Vesia; Cricia Rinchon; Robert Chen; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Anodal tDCS over Primary Motor Cortex Provides No Advantage to Learning Motor Sequences via Observation.

Authors:  Dace Apšvalka; Richard Ramsey; Emily S Cross
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Primary somatosensory cortex necessary for the perception of weight from other people's action: A continuous theta-burst TMS experiment.

Authors:  Nikola Valchev; Emmanuele Tidoni; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Valeria Gazzola; Alessio Avenanti
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Boosting the Motor Outcome of the Untrained Hand by Action Observation: Mirror Visual Feedback, Video Therapy, or Both Combined-What Is More Effective?

Authors:  Florian Bähr; Alexander Ritter; Gundula Seidel; Christian Puta; Holger H W Gabriel; Farsin Hamzei
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Competition Rather Than Observation and Cooperation Facilitates Optimal Motor Planning.

Authors:  Mamoru Tanae; Keiji Ota; Ken Takiyama
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-02-26

10.  Observing Action Sequences Elicits Sequence-Specific Neural Representations in Frontoparietal Brain Regions.

Authors:  Dace Apšvalka; Emily S Cross; Richard Ramsey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.