Literature DB >> 26970114

Prospective first-trimester screening for trisomies by cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood in twin pregnancy.

L Sarno1, R Revello1, E Hanson1, R Akolekar1,2, K H Nicolaides1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: First, to examine in twin pregnancies the performance of first-trimester screening for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by cell-free (cf) DNA testing of maternal blood and, second, to compare twin and singleton pregnancies regarding the distribution of fetal fraction of cfDNA and rate of failure to obtain a result.
METHODS: This was a prospective study in 438 twin and 10 698 singleton pregnancies undergoing screening for fetal trisomies by cfDNA testing at 10 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation. Chromosome-selective sequencing of cfDNA was used and, in twin pregnancies, an algorithm was applied that relies on the lower fetal fraction contributed by the two fetuses. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors of fetal fraction and a failed result.
RESULTS: In twin pregnancies, the median fetal fraction was lower (8.0% (interquartile range (IQR), 6.0-10.4%) vs 11.0% (IQR, 8.3-14.4%); P < 0.0001) and failure rate after first sampling was higher (9.4% vs 2.9%; P < 0.0001) compared to in singletons. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the risk of test failure increased with increasing maternal age and body mass index and decreased with fetal crown-rump length. The risk was increased in women of South Asian racial origin and in pregnancies conceived by in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The main contributor to the higher rate of failure in twins was conception by IVF which was observed in 9.5% of singletons and 56.2% of twins. In the 417 twin pregnancies with a cfDNA result after first or second sampling, the detection rate was 100% (8/8) for trisomy 21 and 60% (3/5) for trisomies 18 or 13, at a false-positive rate (FPR) of 0.25% (1/404). In the 10 530 singleton pregnancies with a cfDNA result after first or second sampling, the detection rate was 98.7% (156/158) for trisomy 21 and 80.3% (49/61) for trisomies 18 or 13, at a FPR of 0.22% (23/10 311).
CONCLUSIONS: In twin pregnancies undergoing first-trimester screening for trisomies by cfDNA testing, the fetal fraction is lower and failure rate higher compared to in singletons. The number of trisomic twin pregnancies examined was too small for an accurate assessment of performance of screening, but it may be similar to that in singleton pregnancies.
Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell-free DNA; fetal fraction; first-trimester screening; non-invasive prenatal testing; trisomy 21; twin pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26970114     DOI: 10.1002/uog.15913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  11 in total

Review 1.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness of cell-free DNA in maternal blood testing for prenatal detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lidia García-Pérez; Renata Linertová; Margarita Álvarez-de-la-Rosa; Juan Carlos Bayón; Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia; Jorge Ferrer-Rodríguez; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-12-16

3.  Trisomy 21 in both fetuses in a DCDA twin pregnancy.

Authors:  Jiawen Ong; Arundhati Gosavi; Arijit Biswas; Mahesh Choolani
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-14

Review 4.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

5.  A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Brittany Dyr; Theresa Boomer; Eyad A Almasri; Jenna L Wardrop; Jill Rafalko; Jason Chibuk; Ron M McCullough
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Hemolysis and Fetal Fraction in Cell-Free DNA Blood Collection Tubes for Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Renee Stokowski; Karen White; Coleen Hacker; Jigna Doshi; Maximilian Schmid
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 7.  Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Luigi Carbone; Federica Cariati; Laura Sarno; Alessandro Conforti; Francesca Bagnulo; Ida Strina; Lucio Pastore; Giuseppe Maria Maruotti; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Non-invasive prenatal test to screen common trisomies in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Mahtab Motevasselian; Soraya Saleh Gargari; Sarang Younesi; Parichehr Pooransari; Pourandokht Saadati; Masoomeh Mirzamoradi; Shahram Savad; Mohammad Mahdi Taheri Amin; Mohammad-Hossein Modarresi; Maryam Afrakhteh; Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Cell-free DNA fetal fraction in twin gestations in single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal screening.

Authors:  Herman Hedriana; Kimberly Martin; Daniel Saltzman; Paul Billings; Zachary Demko; Peter Benn
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 10.  Non-invasive prenatal testing in the management of twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Peter Benn; Andrei Rebarber
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.