Literature DB >> 26970050

Increase in primary surgical treatment of T1 and T2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and rates of adverse pathologic features: National Cancer Data Base.

Jennifer R Cracchiolo1, Shrujal S Baxi2, Luc G Morris1, Ian Ganly1, Snehal G Patel1, Marc A Cohen1,3, Benjamin R Roman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest in the primary surgical treatment of patients with early T classification (T1-T2) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with the stated goal of de-escalating or avoiding adjuvant treatment. Herein, the authors sought to determine the degree to which this interest has translated into changes in practice patterns, and the rates of adverse postoperative pathologic features.
METHODS: Patients with T1 to T2 OPSCC in the National Cancer Data Base who were treated from 2004 through 2013 were categorized as receiving primary surgical or primary radiation-based treatment. Trends in treatment selection and factors related to the selection of primary surgery were examined. The rates of adverse pathologic features including positive surgical margins, extracapsular spread (ECS), and advanced T and N classifications after surgery were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of 8768 patients with T1 to T2 OPSCC, 68% underwent primary surgical treatment, increasing from 56% in 2004 to 82% in 2013 (P<.0001). The highest versus lowest volume hospitals treated 78% versus 59% of patients with primary surgery (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-3.22 [P<.0001]). Higher lymph node classification was found to be predictive of lower rates of primary surgery, but the majority of patients with clinical N2/N3 disease underwent primary surgery. Among patients treated with surgery, positive surgical margins were present in 24% and ECS in 25% of patients. The rate of positive surgical margins decreased over time (P<.0001) and was observed less often at high-volume centers (P<.0001). Among candidates for single-modality therapy (those with clinical T1-T2/N0-N1 disease), 33% had positive surgical margins and/or ECS and 47% had at least 1 adverse feature (T3-T4 disease, N2-N3 disease, positive surgical margins, and/or ECS).
CONCLUSIONS: Primary surgical treatment among patients with early T classification OPSCC has become more widespread. Cancer 2016;122:1523-32.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extracapsular spread (ECS); human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC); positive surgical margins; transoral robotic surgery (TORS); treatment selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26970050      PMCID: PMC4860079          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  23 in total

1.  Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma.

Authors:  G Calais; M Alfonsi; E Bardet; C Sire; T Germain; P Bergerot; B Rhein; J Tortochaux; P Oudinot; P Bertrand
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  A shifting paradigm for patients with head and neck cancer: transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

Authors:  Amy Y Chen
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.990

3.  A Contemporary Analysis of Surgical Trends in the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx from 1998 to 2012: A Report from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Erik Liederbach; Carol M Lewis; Katharine Yao; Bruce E Brockstein; Chi-Hsiung Wang; Waseem Lutfi; Mihir K Bhayani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States.

Authors:  Anil K Chaturvedi; Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Brenda Y Hernandez; Weihong Xiao; Esther Kim; Bo Jiang; Marc T Goodman; Maria Sibug-Saber; Wendy Cozen; Lihua Liu; Charles F Lynch; Nicolas Wentzensen; Richard C Jordan; Sean Altekruse; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  The role of surgery for HPV-associated head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Wojciech K Mydlarz; Jason Y K Chan; Jeremy D Richmon
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  Transoral robotic resection and reconstruction for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Eric M Genden; Tamar Kotz; Charles C L Tong; Claris Smith; Andrew G Sikora; Marita S Teng; Stuart H Packer; William L Lawson; Johnny Kao
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501).

Authors:  Jacques Bernier; Jay S Cooper; T F Pajak; M van Glabbeke; J Bourhis; Arlene Forastiere; Esat Mahmut Ozsahin; John R Jacobs; J Jassem; Kie-Kian Ang; J L Lefèbvre
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Gypsyamber D'Souza; Aimee R Kreimer; Raphael Viscidi; Michael Pawlita; Carole Fakhry; Wayne M Koch; William H Westra; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Carole Fakhry; William H Westra; Sigui Li; Anthony Cmelak; John A Ridge; Harlan Pinto; Arlene Forastiere; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  34 in total

1.  Adoption of transoral robotic surgery compared with other surgical modalities for treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer R Cracchiolo; Benjamin R Roman; David I Kutler; William I Kuhel; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Development of an online, patient-centred decision aid for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in the transoral robotic surgery era.

Authors:  J S Lam; G M Scott; D A Palma; K Fung; A V Louie
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael J Persky; William G Albergotti; Tanya J Rath; Mark W Kubik; Shira Abberbock; Mathew Geltzeiler; Seungwon Kim; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 4.  Treatment preferences in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Melina J Windon; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Carole Fakhry
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.404

5.  [Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery for primary treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: randomisation decides].

Authors:  Alexander Fabian; David Krug
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Current Role of Surgery in the Management of Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Meghan T Turner; J Kenneth Byrd; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Shlomo A Koyfman; Nofisat Ismaila; Doug Crook; Anil D'Cruz; Cristina P Rodriguez; David J Sher; Damian Silbermins; Erich M Sturgis; Terance T Tsue; Jared Weiss; Sue S Yom; F Christopher Holsinger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Comparing Kadish, TNM, and the modified Dulguerov staging systems for esthesioneuroblastoma.

Authors:  Rohan R Joshi; Qasim Husain; Benjamin R Roman; Jennifer Cracchiolo; Yao Yu; Jillian Tsai; Julie Kang; Sean McBride; Nancy Y Lee; Luc Morris; Ian Ganly; Viviane Tabar; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Haemorrhage following transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  A Hay; J Migliacci; D Karassawa Zanoni; J O Boyle; B Singh; R J Wong; S G Patel; I Ganly
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  Comparison of Survival After Transoral Robotic Surgery vs Nonrobotic Surgery in Patients With Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Anthony T Nguyen; Michael Luu; Jon Mallen-St Clair; Alain C Mita; Kevin S Scher; Diana J Lu; Stephen L Shiao; Allen S Ho; Zachary S Zumsteg
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.