Thomas J Roberts1, A Dimitrios Colevas2, Wendy Hara3, F Christopher Holsinger1, Ingrid Oakley-Girvan4,5,6,7, Vasu Divi1,7. 1. Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 2. Department of Medicine-Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology-Radiation Therapy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 4. Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, California. 5. Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 6. Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford, California. 7. Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent changes in head and neck cancer epidemiology have created a need for improved lymph node prognostics. This article compares the prognostic value of the number of positive nodes (pN) with the value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N staging in surgical patients. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas from 2004 to 2012. The sample was grouped by the AJCC N stage, LNR, and pN and was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. The sample was also analyzed by the site of the primary tumor. RESULTS: This study identified 12,437 patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed superior prognostic ability for LNR and pN staging in comparison with AJCC staging. Patients with a pN value > 5 had the worst overall survival (5-year survival rate, 16%). Patients with oropharyngeal tumors had better outcomes for all groupings, and a pN value > 5 for oropharyngeal cancers was associated with decreased survival. Multivariate regressions demonstrated larger hazard ratios (HRs) and a lower Akaike information criterion for the pN model versus the AJCC stage and LNR models. The HRs were 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.62-1.95) for a pN value of 1, 2.53 (95% confidence interval, 2.32-2.75) for a pN value of 2 to 5, and 4.64 (95% confidence interval, 4.18-5.14) for a pN value > 5. CONCLUSIONS: The pN models demonstrated superior prognostic value in comparison with the LNR and AJCC N staging. Future modifications of the nodal staging system should be based on the pN with a separate system for oropharyngeal cancers. Future trials should consider examining adjuvant treatment escalation in patients with >5 lymph nodes. Cancer 2016;122:1388-1397.
BACKGROUND: Recent changes in head and neck cancer epidemiology have created a need for improved lymph node prognostics. This article compares the prognostic value of the number of positive nodes (pN) with the value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N staging in surgical patients. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas from 2004 to 2012. The sample was grouped by the AJCC N stage, LNR, and pN and was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. The sample was also analyzed by the site of the primary tumor. RESULTS: This study identified 12,437 patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed superior prognostic ability for LNR and pN staging in comparison with AJCC staging. Patients with a pN value > 5 had the worst overall survival (5-year survival rate, 16%). Patients with oropharyngeal tumors had better outcomes for all groupings, and a pN value > 5 for oropharyngeal cancers was associated with decreased survival. Multivariate regressions demonstrated larger hazard ratios (HRs) and a lower Akaike information criterion for the pN model versus the AJCC stage and LNR models. The HRs were 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.62-1.95) for a pN value of 1, 2.53 (95% confidence interval, 2.32-2.75) for a pN value of 2 to 5, and 4.64 (95% confidence interval, 4.18-5.14) for a pN value > 5. CONCLUSIONS: The pN models demonstrated superior prognostic value in comparison with the LNR and AJCC N staging. Future modifications of the nodal staging system should be based on the pN with a separate system for oropharyngeal cancers. Future trials should consider examining adjuvant treatment escalation in patients with >5 lymph nodes. Cancer 2016;122:1388-1397.
Authors: Pieter D de Veij Mestdagh; Marcel C J Jonker; Wouter V Vogel; Willem H Schreuder; Maarten L Donswijk; W Martin C Klop; Abrahim Al-Mamgani Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: M de Ridder; C C M Marres; L E Smeele; M W M van den Brekel; M Hauptmann; A J M Balm; M L F van Velthuysen Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2016-09-18 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Somiah Siddiq; David Cartlidge; Sarah Stephen; Hans P Sathasivam; Hannah Fox; James O'Hara; David Meikle; Muhammad Shahid Iqbal; Charles G Kelly; Max Robinson; Vinidh Paleri Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-05-12 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Shlomo A Koyfman; Nofisat Ismaila; Doug Crook; Anil D'Cruz; Cristina P Rodriguez; David J Sher; Damian Silbermins; Erich M Sturgis; Terance T Tsue; Jared Weiss; Sue S Yom; F Christopher Holsinger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan Oliver Voss; Lea Freund; Felix Neumann; Friedrich Mrosk; Kerstin Rubarth; Kilian Kreutzer; Christian Doll; Max Heiland; Steffen Koerdt Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 3.606
Authors: Katri Aro; Allen S Ho; Michael Luu; Sungjin Kim; Mourad Tighiouart; Jon Mallen-St Clair; Emi J Yoshida; Stephen L Shiao; Ilmo Leivo; Zachary S Zumsteg Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Allen S Ho; Sungjin Kim; Mourad Tighiouart; Cynthia Gudino; Alain Mita; Kevin S Scher; Anna Laury; Ravi Prasad; Stephen L Shiao; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Zachary S Zumsteg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 50.717