Thea Helene Degett1, Helene Schou Andersen2, Ismail Gögenur2. 1. Center for Surgical Science (CSS), Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark. theadegett@gmail.com. 2. Center for Surgical Science (CSS), Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage following gastrointestinal surgery remains a frequent and serious complication associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is a newly developed technique to measure perfusion intraoperatively. The aim of this paper was to systematically review the literature concerning ICG-FA to assess perfusion during the construction of a primary gastrointestinal anastomosis in order to predict anastomotic leakage. METHODS: The following four databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane were independently searched by two authors. Studies were included in the review if they assessed anastomotic perfusion intraoperatively with ICG-FA in order to predict anastomotic leakage in humans. RESULTS: Of 790 screened papers 14 studies were included in this review. Ten studies (n = 916) involved patients with colorectal anastomoses and four studies (n = 214) patients with esophageal anastomoses. All the included studies were cohort studies. Intraoperative ICG-FA assessment of colorectal anastomoses was associated with a reduced risk of anastomotic leakage (n = 23/693; 3.3 % (95 % CI 1.97-4.63 %) compared with no ICG-FA assessment (n = 19/223; 8.5 %; 95 % CI 4.8-12.2 %). The anastomotic leakage rate in patients with esophageal anastomoses and intraoperative ICG-FA assessment was 14 % (n = 30/214). None of the studies involving esophageal anastomoses had a control group without ICG-FA assessment. CONCLUSION: No randomized controlled trials have been published. ICG-FA seems like a promising method to assess perfusion at the site intended for anastomosis. However, we do not have the sufficient evidence to determine that the method can reduce the leak rate.
PURPOSE:Anastomotic leakage following gastrointestinal surgery remains a frequent and serious complication associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is a newly developed technique to measure perfusion intraoperatively. The aim of this paper was to systematically review the literature concerning ICG-FA to assess perfusion during the construction of a primary gastrointestinal anastomosis in order to predict anastomotic leakage. METHODS: The following four databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane were independently searched by two authors. Studies were included in the review if they assessed anastomotic perfusion intraoperatively with ICG-FA in order to predict anastomotic leakage in humans. RESULTS: Of 790 screened papers 14 studies were included in this review. Ten studies (n = 916) involved patients with colorectal anastomoses and four studies (n = 214) patients with esophageal anastomoses. All the included studies were cohort studies. Intraoperative ICG-FA assessment of colorectal anastomoses was associated with a reduced risk of anastomotic leakage (n = 23/693; 3.3 % (95 % CI 1.97-4.63 %) compared with no ICG-FA assessment (n = 19/223; 8.5 %; 95 % CI 4.8-12.2 %). The anastomotic leakage rate in patients with esophageal anastomoses and intraoperative ICG-FA assessment was 14 % (n = 30/214). None of the studies involving esophageal anastomoses had a control group without ICG-FA assessment. CONCLUSION: No randomized controlled trials have been published. ICG-FA seems like a promising method to assess perfusion at the site intended for anastomosis. However, we do not have the sufficient evidence to determine that the method can reduce the leak rate.
Authors: Mehraneh D Jafari; Steven D Wexner; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; David A Margolin; Danny A Sherwinter; Sang W Lee; Anthony J Senagore; Michael J Phelan; Michael J Stamos Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Frederic Ris; Roel Hompes; Chris Cunningham; Ian Lindsey; Richard Guy; Oliver Jones; Bruce George; Ronan A Cahill; Neil J Mortensen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: I Gockel; B Jansen-Winkeln; N Holfert; N Rayes; R Thieme; M Maktabi; R Sucher; D Seehofer; M Barberio; M Diana; S M Rabe; M Mehdorn; Y Moulla; S Niebisch; D Branzan; K Rehmet; J P Takoh; T-O Petersen; T Neumuth; A Melzer; C Chalopin; H Köhler Journal: Chirurg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Boris Jansen-Winkeln; N Holfert; H Köhler; Y Moulla; J P Takoh; S M Rabe; M Mehdorn; M Barberio; C Chalopin; T Neumuth; I Gockel Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2019-02-02 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Nikolaj Nerup; Linea Landgrebe Ring; Rune Broni Strandby; Charlotte Egeland; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Jane Preuss Hasselby; Gro Linno Willemoe; Bolette Hartmann; Lars Bo Svendsen; Michael Patrick Achiam Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Marino Di Furia; Lucia Romano; Andrea Salvatorelli; Denise Brandolin; Davide Lomanto; Giovanni Cianca; Mario Schietroma; Francesco Carlei; Antonio Giuliani Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Jonas Hedelund Rønn; Nikolaj Nerup; Rune Broni Strandby; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Rikard Ambrus; Lars Bo Svendsen; Michael Patrick Achiam Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 3.445