Xiaoming Zhang1, Ela Plow2, Vinoth Ranganthan3, Honglian Huang4, Melissa Schmitt5, Gregory Nemunaitis6, Clay Kelly7, Frederick Frost8, Vernon Lin9. 1. Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH(∗). 2. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH(†). 3. Dabir Surfaces, Inc, Southfield, MI(‡). 4. Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH(¶). 5. Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH(§). 6. Metrohealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH(∗∗). 7. Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH(††). 8. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH(‡‡). 9. Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH(¶¶). Electronic address: linv@ccf.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Respiratory complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality in persons with a spinal cord injury, partly because of respiratory muscle paralysis. Earlier investigation has demonstrated that functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) can be used as a noninvasive technology for activating expiratory muscles, thus producing useful expiratory functions (simulated cough) in subjects with spinal cord injury. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of FMS for conditioning inspiratory and expiratory muscles in persons with tetraplegia. DESIGN: A prospective before and after trial. SETTING: FMS Laboratory, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH. PARTICIPANTS: Six persons with tetraplegia. METHOD: Each subject participated in a 6-week FMS protocol for conditioning the inspiratory and expiratory muscles. A magnetic stimulator was used with the center of a magnetic coil placed at the C7-T1 and T9-T10 spinous processes, respectively. Pulmonary function tests were performed before, during, and after the protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Respiratory variables included maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), peak inspiratory flow (PIF), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). RESULTS: After 6 weeks of conditioning, the main outcome measurements (mean ± standard error) were as follows: MIP, 89.6 ± 7.3 cm H2O; IRV, 1.90 ± 0.34 L; PIF, 302.4 ± 36.3 L/min; MEP, 67.4 ± 11.1 cm H2O; ERV, 0.40 ± 0.06 L; and PEF, 372.4 ± 31.9 L/min. These values corresponded to 117%, 107%, 136%, 109%, 130%, and 124% of pre-FMS conditioning values, respectively. Significant improvements were observed in MIP (P = .022), PIF (P = .0001), and PEF (P = .0006), respectively. When FMS was discontinued for 4 weeks, these values showed decreases from their values at the end of the conditioning protocol, which suggests that continual FMS may be necessary to maintain improved respiratory functions. CONCLUSION: FMS conditioning of the inspiratory and expiratory muscles improved voluntary inspiratory and expiratory functions. FMS may be a noninvasive technology for respiratory muscle training in persons with tetraplegia.
BACKGROUND: Respiratory complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality in persons with a spinal cord injury, partly because of respiratory muscle paralysis. Earlier investigation has demonstrated that functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) can be used as a noninvasive technology for activating expiratory muscles, thus producing useful expiratory functions (simulated cough) in subjects with spinal cord injury. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of FMS for conditioning inspiratory and expiratory muscles in persons with tetraplegia. DESIGN: A prospective before and after trial. SETTING: FMS Laboratory, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH. PARTICIPANTS: Six persons with tetraplegia. METHOD: Each subject participated in a 6-week FMS protocol for conditioning the inspiratory and expiratory muscles. A magnetic stimulator was used with the center of a magnetic coil placed at the C7-T1 and T9-T10 spinous processes, respectively. Pulmonary function tests were performed before, during, and after the protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Respiratory variables included maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), peak inspiratory flow (PIF), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). RESULTS: After 6 weeks of conditioning, the main outcome measurements (mean ± standard error) were as follows: MIP, 89.6 ± 7.3 cm H2O; IRV, 1.90 ± 0.34 L; PIF, 302.4 ± 36.3 L/min; MEP, 67.4 ± 11.1 cm H2O; ERV, 0.40 ± 0.06 L; and PEF, 372.4 ± 31.9 L/min. These values corresponded to 117%, 107%, 136%, 109%, 130%, and 124% of pre-FMS conditioning values, respectively. Significant improvements were observed in MIP (P = .022), PIF (P = .0001), and PEF (P = .0006), respectively. When FMS was discontinued for 4 weeks, these values showed decreases from their values at the end of the conditioning protocol, which suggests that continual FMS may be necessary to maintain improved respiratory functions. CONCLUSION: FMS conditioning of the inspiratory and expiratory muscles improved voluntary inspiratory and expiratory functions. FMS may be a noninvasive technology for respiratory muscle training in persons with tetraplegia.
Authors: James S Walter; Joseph Posluszny; Raymond Dieter; Robert S Dieter; Scott Sayers; Kiratipath Iamsakul; Christine Staunton; Donald Thomas; Mark Rabbat; Sanjay Singh Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Xiaowei Chen; Xuncan Liu; Yinxing Cui; Guoxing Xu; Lu Liu; Xueru Zhang; Kun Jiang; Zhenlan Li Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 1.671