Literature DB >> 26968561

Analysis of open and intracorporeal robotic assisted radical cystectomy shows no significant difference in recurrence patterns and oncological outcomes.

Wei Shen Tan1, Ashwin Sridhar2, Gidon Ellis3, Benjamin Lamb2, Miles Goldstraw2, Senthil Nathan2, John Hines2, Paul Cathcart2, Tim Briggs4, John Kelly5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report and compare early oncological outcomes and cancer recurrence sites among patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC) and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 184 patients underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. ORC cases (n = 94) were performed between June 2005 and July 2014 while iRARC cases (n = 90) were performed between June 2011 and July 2014. Primary outcome was recurrence free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes were sites of local and metastatic recurrence, cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Median follow-up for patients without recurrence was 33.8 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 20.5-45.4) for ORC; and 16.1 months (IQR: 11.2-27.0) for iRARC. No significant difference in age, sex, precystectomy T stage, precystectomy grade, or lymph node yield between ORC and iRARC was observed. The ORC cohort included more patients with≥pT2 (64.8% ORC vs. 38.9% iRARC) but fewer pT0 status (8.5% ORC vs.vs. 22.2% iRARC) due to lower preoperative chemotherapy use (22.3% ORC vs. 34.4% iRARC). Positive surgical margin rate was significantly higher in the ORC cohort (19.3% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.042). Kaplan-Meir analysis showed no significant difference in RFS (69.5% ORC vs. 78.8% iRARC), cancer specific survival (80.9% ORC vs. 84.4% iRARC), or OS (73.5% ORC vs.vs. iRARC 83.8%) at 24 months. Cox regression analysis showed RFS, cancer specific survival and OS were not influenced by cystectomy technique. No significant difference between local and metastatic RFS between ORC and iRARC was observed.
CONCLUSION: This study has found no difference in recurrence patterns or oncological outcomes between ORC and iRARC. Recurrent metastatic sites vary, but are not related to surgical technique.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Intracorporeal urinary diversion; Open cystectomy; Outcomes; Recurrence; Robotic-assisted cystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26968561     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  15 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Robotics in the Invasive Management of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Pramit Khetrapal; Wei Shen Tan; Benjamin Lamb; Melanie Tan; Hilary Baker; James Thompson; Ashwin Sridhar; John D Kelly; Tim Briggs
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults.

Authors:  Bhavan Prasad Rai; Jasper Bondad; Nikhil Vasdev; Jim Adshead; Tim Lane; Kamran Ahmed; Mohammed S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Khurshid Guru; Piotr L Chlosta; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-24

3.  A Retrospective Study Comparing Surgical and Early Oncological Outcomes between Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Ileal Conduit after Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy from a Single Center.

Authors:  Ming-Shuai Wang; Qing-Bao He; Fei-Ya Yang; Hao Ping; Nian-Zeng Xing
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 4.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: patient selection and special considerations.

Authors:  Mevlana Derya Balbay; Erdem Koc; Abdullah Erdem Canda
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2017-10-19

5.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study.

Authors:  James W F Catto; Pramit Khetrapal; Gareth Ambler; Rachael Sarpong; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Melanie Tan; Andrew Feber; Simon Dixon; Louise Goodwin; Norman R Williams; John McGrath; Edward Rowe; Anthony Koupparis; Chris Brew-Graves; John D Kelly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Contemporary techniques and outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.

Authors:  Ardenne S Martin; Anthony T Corcoran
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

7.  Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion Does Not Show a Benefit over Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Wei Shen Tan; Pramit Khetrapal; Wei Phin Tan; Simon Rodney; Marisa Chau; John D Kelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The current status of robot-assisted cystectomy.

Authors:  Stavros Ioannis Tyritzis; Justin W Collins; Nils Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

9.  Is experience with extracorporeal urinary diversion following robotic assisted radical cystectomy necessary before transitioning to intracorporeal urinary diversion?

Authors:  Wei Shen Tan; John D Kelly
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12

Review 10.  Robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: beyond the initial experience.

Authors:  Prithvi B Murthy; Darren J Bryk; Byron H Lee; Georges-Pascal Haber
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.