| Literature DB >> 26967200 |
Leonoor Wijnans1,2, Caitlin Dodd1, Maria de Ridder1, Silvana Romio1,3, Daniel Weibel1, Sebastiaan Overeem4, Gert Jan Lammers5,6, Jan Bonhoeffer7,8, Steve Black9, Miriam Sturkenboom1.
Abstract
Several studies have identified an association between Pandemrix(TM), an AS03 adjuvanted pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccine, and narcolepsy, a rare and under-diagnosed sleep disorder with a median onset-to-diagnosis interval of ten years. This paper reviews potential sources of bias in published studies and aims to provide, through simulation, methodological recommendations for assessment of vaccine safety signals. Our simulation study showed that in the absence of an association between the vaccine and the outcome, presence of detection bias and differential exposure misclassification could account for elevated risk estimates. These may play a major role, particularly in alert situations when observation times are limited and the disease has a long latency period. Estimates from the case-control design were less inflated than those from the cohort design when these biases were present. Overall, these simulations provide useful insights for the design and interpretation of future studies.Entities:
Keywords: Bias; Narcolepsy; Pandemic Influenza; Pandemrix; Simulation; Vaccine Safety
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26967200 DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2016.1164045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines ISSN: 1476-0584 Impact factor: 5.217