Literature DB >> 26966615

Criteria for Drug Reimbursement Decision-Making: An Emerging Public Health Challenge in Bulgaria.

Georgi Iskrov1, Rumen Stefanov1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During times of fiscal austerity, means of reimbursement decision-making are of particular interest for public health theory and practice. Introduction of advanced health technologies, growing health expenditures and increased public scrutiny over drug reimbursement decisions have pushed governments to consider mechanisms that promote the use of effective health technologies, while constraining costs. AIMS: The study's aim was to explore the current rationale of the drug reimbursement decision-making framework in Bulgaria. Our pilot research focused on one particular component of this process - the criteria used - because of the critical role that criteria are known to have in setting budgets and priorities in the field of public health. The analysis pursued two objectives: to identify important criteria relevant to drug reimbursement decision-making and to unveil relationships between theory and practice. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: The study was realized through a closed-ended survey on reimbursement criteria among four major public health stakeholders - medical professionals, patients, health authorities, and industry. Empirical outcomes were then cross-compared with the theoretical framework, as defined by current Bulgarian public health legislation. Analysis outlined what is done and what needs to be done in the field of public health reimbursement decision-making.
RESULTS: Bulgarian public health stakeholders agreed on 15 criteria to form a tentative optimal framework for drug reimbursement decision-making. The most apparent gap between the empirically found preferences and the official legislation is the lack of consideration for the strength of evidence in reimbursement decisions.
CONCLUSION: Bulgarian policy makers need to address specific gaps, such as formal consideration for strength of evidence, explicit role of efficiency criteria, and means to effectively empower patient and citizen involvement in public health decision-making. Drug reimbursement criteria have to be integrated into legitimate public health decision support tools that ensure the achievement of national public health objectives. These recommendations could be expanded to all Eastern European countries who share common public health problems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulgaria; decision support models; decision-making; health technology assessment; reimbursement; reimbursement criteria

Year:  2016        PMID: 26966615      PMCID: PMC4767306          DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Balkan Med J        ISSN: 2146-3123            Impact factor:   2.021


  27 in total

1.  Criteria for determining a basic health services package. Recent developments in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E A Stolk; M J Poley
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2005-03

2.  Reconciliation of economic concerns and health policy: illustration of an equity adjustment procedure using proportional shortfall.

Authors:  Elly A Stolk; Gijs van Donselaar; Werner B F Brouwer; Jan J V Busschbach
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond.

Authors:  Angela Rocchi; Devidas Menon; Shailendra Verma; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Applying rapid 'de-facto' HTA in resource-limited settings: experience from Romania.

Authors:  Ruth Lopert; Francis Ruiz; Kalipso Chalkidou
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  A review of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) recommendations for drug therapies issued between 2007 and 2009 and their impact on policymaking processes in Poland.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kolasa; Sebastian Schubert; Andrea Manca; Tadeusz Hermanowski
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of restrictions on reimbursement.

Authors:  Carolyn J Green; Malcolm Maclure; Patricia M Fortin; Craig R Ramsay; Morten Aaserud; Stan Bardal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

7.  Stakeholder involvement in expensive drug recommendation decisions: an international perspective.

Authors:  Zahava R S Rosenberg-Yunger; Halla Thorsteinsdóttir; Abdallah S Daar; Douglas K Martin
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines.

Authors:  Jon Sussex; Pierrick Rollet; Martina Garau; Claude Schmitt; Alastair Kent; Adam Hutchings
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in Canada.

Authors:  Michèle Tony; Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Donna Rindress; Tina Papastavros; Paul Oh; Mireille M Goetghebeur
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis.

Authors:  Thierry Defechereux; Francesco Paolucci; Andrew Mirelman; Sitaporn Youngkong; Grete Botten; Terje P Hagen; Louis W Niessen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of miglustat versus symptomatic therapy of Niemann-Pick disease type C.

Authors:  Medo Gutić; Miloš N Milosavljević; Slobodan M Janković
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-10-15

2.  Potential Criteria for Frameworks to Support the Evaluation of Innovative Medicines in Upper Middle-Income Countries-A Systematic Literature Review on Value Frameworks and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses.

Authors:  Ivett Jakab; Bertalan Németh; Baher Elezbawy; Melis Almula Karadayı; Hakan Tozan; Sabahattin Aydın; Jie Shen; Zoltán Kaló
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Health Economic Data in Reimbursement of New Medical Technologies: Importance of the Socio-Economic Burden as a Decision-Making Criterion.

Authors:  Georgi Iskrov; Svetlan Dermendzhiev; Tsonka Miteva-Katrandzhieva; Rumen Stefanov
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs.

Authors:  Georgi Iskrov; Tsonka Miteva-Katrandzhieva; Rumen Stefanov
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-09-30

5.  Decision-making criteria for medicine reimbursement in Slovenia: an expert panel discussion.

Authors:  Andreja Detiček; Andrej Janzic; Igor Locatelli; Mitja Kos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.

Authors:  Maria Dimitrova; Ivett Jakab; Zornitsa Mitkova; Maria Kamusheva; Konstantin Tachkov; Bertalan Nemeth; Antal Zemplenyi; Dalia Dawoud; Diana M J Delnoij; François Houýez; Zoltan Kalo
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28

7.  What are the impacts of increasing cost-effectiveness Threshold? a protocol on an empirical study based on economic evaluations conducted in Thailand.

Authors:  Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Ryota Nakamura; Hwee Lin Wee; Myka Harun Sarajan; Yi Wang; Budsadee Soboon; Jing Lou; Jia Hui Chai; Wannisa Theantawee; Jutatip Laoharuangchaiyot; Thanakrit Mongkolchaipak; Thanisa Thathong; Pritaporn Kingkaew; Kriang Tungsanga; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.