OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to critically review and analyze the Polish Health Technology Assessment (AHTAPol) agency's health technology drug recommendations (HTA activity), in order to ascertain to what extent HTA findings have been incorporated into national drug reimbursement decisions (HTA impact). METHODOLOGY: HTA recommendations issued between 2007 and 2009 were studied. Positive recommendations were classified into three categories: recommendations with major restrictions; minor restrictions; and without restrictions. Definitions of clinical and non-clinical reasons were drawn ups for negative recommendations. The study examined how many different drug technologies assessed by AHTAPol were included in reimbursement lists. RESULTS: In terms of HTA activity, 63 negative and 83 positive HTA recommendations were issued. While clinical arguments were the most prevalent reason for negative HTA recommendations, major restrictions were most common in the positive guidance group. In terms of HTA impact, the results revealed 30 drugs with positive HTA recommendations and four with negative HTA recommendations were included on the reimbursement lists. CONCLUSIONS: Most of AHTAPol's recommendations have a positive outcome for the drug being appraised. The study revealed room for further enhancement of HTA impact. Three key areas that need future attention were identified: consistency, credibility; and pragmatism.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to critically review and analyze the Polish Health Technology Assessment (AHTAPol) agency's health technology drug recommendations (HTA activity), in order to ascertain to what extent HTA findings have been incorporated into national drug reimbursement decisions (HTA impact). METHODOLOGY: HTA recommendations issued between 2007 and 2009 were studied. Positive recommendations were classified into three categories: recommendations with major restrictions; minor restrictions; and without restrictions. Definitions of clinical and non-clinical reasons were drawn ups for negative recommendations. The study examined how many different drug technologies assessed by AHTAPol were included in reimbursement lists. RESULTS: In terms of HTA activity, 63 negative and 83 positive HTA recommendations were issued. While clinical arguments were the most prevalent reason for negative HTA recommendations, major restrictions were most common in the positive guidance group. In terms of HTA impact, the results revealed 30 drugs with positive HTA recommendations and four with negative HTA recommendations were included on the reimbursement lists. CONCLUSIONS: Most of AHTAPol's recommendations have a positive outcome for the drug being appraised. The study revealed room for further enhancement of HTA impact. Three key areas that need future attention were identified: consistency, credibility; and pragmatism.
Authors: László Gulácsi; Alexandru M Rotar; Maciej Niewada; Olga Löblová; Fanni Rencz; Guenka Petrova; Imre Boncz; Niek S Klazinga Journal: Eur J Health Econ Date: 2014-05-16
Authors: Fanni Rencz; László Gulácsi; Michael Drummond; Dominik Golicki; Valentina Prevolnik Rupel; Judit Simon; Elly A Stolk; Valentin Brodszky; Petra Baji; Jakub Závada; Guenka Petrova; Alexandru Rotar; Márta Péntek Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Rickard E Malmström; Brian B Godman; Eduard Diogene; Christoph Baumgärtel; Marion Bennie; Iain Bishop; Anna Brzezinska; Anna Bucsics; Stephen Campbell; Alessandra Ferrario; Alexander E Finlayson; Jurij Fürst; Kristina Garuoliene; Miguel Gomes; Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea; Alan Haycox; Krystyna Hviding; Harald Herholz; Mikael Hoffmann; Saira Jan; Jan Jones; Roberta Joppi; Marija Kalaba; Christina Kvalheim; Ott Laius; Irene Langner; Julie Lonsdale; Sven-Äke Lööv; Kamila Malinowska; Laura McCullagh; Ken Paterson; Vanda Markovic-Pekovic; Andrew Martin; Jutta Piessnegger; Gisbert Selke; Catherine Sermet; Steven Simoens; Cankat Tulunay; Dominik Tomek; Luka Vončina; Vera Vlahovic-Palcevski; Janet Wale; Michael Wilcock; Magdalena Wladysiuk; Menno van Woerkom; Corrine Zara; Lars L Gustafsson Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Zoltán Kaló; Adrian Gheorghe; Mirjana Huic; Marcell Csanádi; Finn Boerlum Kristensen Journal: Health Econ Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 3.046