| Literature DB >> 26966571 |
Hanan H Youssef1, Mervat A Hamza1, Mohamed Fayez1, Elhussein F Mourad1, Mohamed Y Saleh1, Mohamed S Sarhan1, Ragab M Suker1, Asmaa A Eltahlawy1, Rahma A Nemr1, Mahmod El-Tahan2, Silke Ruppel3, Nabil A Hegazi1.
Abstract
Our previous publications and the data presented here provide evidences on the ability of plant-based culture media to optimize the cultivability of rhizobacteria and to support their recovery from plant-soil environments. Compared to the tested chemically-synthetic culture media (e.g. nutrient agar and N-deficient combined-carbon sources media), slurry homogenates, crude saps, juices and powders of cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) and succulent plants (Aloe vera and Aloe arborescens) were rich enough to support growth of rhizobacteria. Representative isolates of Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., Bacillus spp. and Azospirillum spp. exhibited good growth on agar plates of such plant-based culture media. Cell growth and biomass production in liquid batch cultures were comparable to those reported with the synthetic culture media. In addition, the tested plant-based culture media efficiently recovered populations of rhizobacteria associated to plant roots. Culturable populations of >10(6)-10(8) cfu g(-1) were recovered from the ecto- and endo-rhizospheres of tested host plants. More than 100 endophytic culture-dependent isolates were secured and subjected to morphophysiological identification. Factor and cluster analyses indicated the unique community structure, on species, genera, class and phyla levels, of the culturable population recovered with plant-based culture media, being distinct from that obtained with the chemically-synthetic culture media. Proteobacteria were the dominant (78.8%) on plant-based agar culture medium compared to only 31% on nutrient agar, while Firmicutes prevailed on nutrient agar (69%) compared to the plant-based agar culture media (18.2%). Bacteroidetes, represented by Chryseobacterium indologenes, was only reported (3%) among the culturable rhizobacteria community of the plant-based agar culture medium.Entities:
Keywords: Cactus; Community structure of rhizobacteria; Cultivability; Plant-based culture media; Rhizobacteria; Succulent plants
Year: 2015 PMID: 26966571 PMCID: PMC4767806 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2015.07.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Nutritional profile of the dehydrated powder of cactus (O. ficus-indica) as determined by chemical analysis.
| Parameters | Parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Macro nutrients (ppm) | Micronutrients (ppm) | ||
| Ca++ | 0.5625 | Cu | 2.06 |
| Mg++ | 0.0143 | Zn | 0.3393 |
| K+ | 1.736 | Fe | 1.955 |
| Na+ | 1.246 | Mn | 1.16 |
| Se (ppb) | 41.08 | ||
| Pb (ppb) | 0.1066 | ||
| Total P (%) | 0.09 | Total carbohydrate (%) | 52.44 |
| Total ash (%) | 21.4 | Total crude protein (%) | 8.5 |
| Total crude fibre (%) | 9.16 | ||
| Amino acids (%) | Amino acids (%) | ||
| Aspartic | 0.65 | Tyrosine | 0.25 |
| Threonine | 0.31 | Phenylalanine | 0.39 |
| Serine | 0.32 | Histidine | 0.16 |
| Glutamic | 0.8 | Lysine | 0.28 |
| Glycine | 0.37 | Arginine | 0.34 |
| Alanine | 0.4 | Proline | 0.48 |
| Valine | 0.35 | Cysteine | 0.14 |
| Isoleucine | 0.29 | Methionine | 0.08 |
| Leucine | 0.51 | ||
| Vitamin A (ppm) | 7.55 | ||
| Vitamin B (ppm) | 556 | ||
Baker, A.S., & Smith, R.L. (1974). Preparation of solutions for atomic absorption analyses of iron, manganese, zinc, and copper in plant tissue. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22, 103–107.
Truspec Nitrogen Determinator Instruction Manual. March (2006) Part number 200–289.
AOAC International, & Latimer, G. W. (2012a). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. AOAC International. Chapter 4, P. 25–26.
AOAC International, & Latimer, G. W. (2012b). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. AOAC International. Chapter 4, P. 9–13.
Lehotay, S. J., & Hajšlová, J. (2002). Application of gas chromatography in food analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 21(9), 686–697.
AOAC International. “Official Methods of Analysis.” (1998).
Fig. 1(A) Growth of pure isolates of rhizobacteria on agar plates prepared from the diluted crude juice (1:10–1:100, v/v) of the cactus O. ficus-indica. (B) Recovery of endophytic rhizobacteria associated with plant roots on various culture media. Normal distinctive colonies of rhizobacteria associated with the roots of Aloe vera developed on agar plates of plant-based culture media (inoculated with similar aliquots of the same root dilution, 10–2), prepared from diluted juices (1:20, v/v) of A. vera and A. arborescens in comparison with those developed on synthetic standard culture media (nutrient agar and CCM).
Fig. 2Growth of pure isolates of rhizobacteria on agar plates. Collective, i.e. the aggregate of growth indices scored for all tested isolates of rhizobacteria on plant-based culture media: (A) Growth on plant juices and saps irrespective of independent tested rhizobacteria isolates and/or juice/sap dilutions, (B) Growth of individual rhizobacteria isolates, irrespective of plant type or juice/sap dilutions.
Fig. 3The normal growth curves and cell biomass production of Klebsiella oxytoca (above) and Enterobacter agglomerans (below) in liquid batch cultures prepared from the slurry homogenate and dehydrated powder of cactus (O. ficus-indica), compared to the synthetic standard CCM culture medium. Inserted are tables showing calculated doubling times and lag periods.
Mean values and ANOVA analysis of culturable rhizobacteria (g−1 root) associated with roots of A. vera developed on agar plates of plant-based culture media (prepared from juices of A. vera and A. arborescens diluted 1:20 and 1:40, v/v) and standard culture media (NA, nutrient agar; CCM, N-deficient combined carbon sources). Means followed by the same letter are not statistically different.
| Treatments | (Log No g−1 root) |
|---|---|
| 1–3 days | 6.51B |
| 2–7 days | 7.02A |
| 1-Free soil | 6.69B |
| 2-Endo-rhizosphere | 6.16C |
| 3-Ecto-rhizosphere | 7.44A |
| 1-NA | 7.15A |
| 2-CCM | 6.56C |
| 3- | 6.74BC |
| 4- | 6.63BC |
| 5- | 6.87B |
| 6- | 6.64BC |
| 1. Free soil × NA | 6.74CD |
| 2. Free soil × CCM | 6.50DEF |
| 3. Free soil × | 6.59DE |
| 4. Free soil × | 6.48DEF |
| 5. Free soil × | 7.21B |
| 6. Free soil × | 6.63D |
| 1. Endo-rhizosphere × NA | 6.75CD |
| 2. Endo-rhizosphere × CCM | 6.01G |
| 3. Endo-rhizosphere × | 6.08FG |
| 4. Endo-rhizosphere × | 5.94G |
| 5. Endo-rhizosphere × | 6.01G |
| 6. Endo-rhizosphere × | 6.16EFG |
| 1. Ecto-rhizosphere × NA | 7.95A |
| 2. Ecto -rhizosphere × CCM | 7.15BC |
| 3. Ecto -rhizosphere × | 7.56AB |
| 4. Ecto -rhizosphere × | 7.47B |
| 5. Ecto -rhizosphere × | 7.39B |
| 6. Ecto -rhizosphere × | 7.13BC |
Fig. 4The CFUs numbers of rhizobacteria recovered from the endo-rhizosphere of Aloe arborescens on different culture media: NA, nutrient agar; CCM, N-deficient combined carbon sources medium; and plant-based culture media prepared from diluted (1:20, v/v) juices and saps of A. vera, and A. arborescens. Inserted is statistical analysis indicating levels of significance (p = <0.01).
Fig. 5Community composition of endophytic rhizobacteria associated with roots of Aloe vera, based on API biochemical identification of isolates developed on nutrient agar compared to the plant-based culture medium (prepared from the juice of A. arborescens): (A) Species; (B) Genera; (C) and (D) phyla levels.
Community structure of endophytic rhizobacteria associated with roots of A. arborescens developed on its plant sap-based culture medium compared to the synthetic standard CCM culture medium.
| Culture media | Phyla | Class | Genera | Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCM | (2) | (3) | (6) | (12) |
| Gammaproteobacteria | ||||
| Alphaproteobacteria | ||||
| Plant-based | (3) | (3) | (8) | (9) |
| Gammaproteobacteria | ||||
| Flavobacterium | ||||
Fig. 6Factor analysis-species level for the community structure of endophytic rhizobacteria of Aloe vera and Aloe arborescens as revealed by the use of various culture media, illustrating the different community structures of rhizobacteria species recovered on plant-based culture media (sap and juice) compared to those grown on the chemically-synthetic standard media of nutrient agar and CCM. Inserted is cluster distribution on the genus level, supporting the clear distinction between genera of rhizobacteria developed on plant-based culture media and those grown on chemically-synthetic standard media.
Fig. 7Variations in class distribution of rhizobacteria recovered from the endo-rhizosphere of Aloe vera and Aloe arborescens using various culture media tested: NA, nutrient agar; CCM, N-deficient combined carbon sources medium; plant-based culture media prepared from diluted (1:20, v/v) juices and saps of A. arborescens. VNC; viable non-culturable rhizobacteria.