| Literature DB >> 26966329 |
Paulina Correa-Burrows1, Raquel Burrows1, Estela Blanco2, Marcela Reyes1, Sheila Gahagan2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore associations between the nutritional quality of diet at age 16 years and academic performance in students from Santiago, Chile.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26966329 PMCID: PMC4773934 DOI: 10.2471/BLT.15.161315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull World Health Organ ISSN: 0042-9686 Impact factor: 9.408
Characteristics of the study population and nutritional quality of their diet, Chile, 2009–2012
| Variable | All ( | Diet category | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unhealthy ( | Fair ( | Healthy ( | |||
| 16.8 | 16.8 | 16.8 | 16.8 | NSa | |
| Male | 191 (48.4) | 27 (40.3) | 104 (54.5) | 60 (45.8) | NSb |
| Female | 204 (51.6) | 40 (59.7) | 93 (45.5) | 71 (54.2) | – |
| Average BMI, | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.66 | NSa |
| < 1 SD, No. (%) | 243 (61.4) | 35 (52.2) | 131 (66.5) | 77 (58.8) | NSb |
| ≥ 1 SD, No. (%) | 152 (38.6) | 32 (47.8) | 66 (33.5) | 54 (41.2) | – |
| Language test | 460.3 | 430.6 | 466.9 | 465.2 | 0.007a |
| Mathematics test | 462.8 | 435.3 | 466.1 | 467.7 | 0.010a |
| GPA | 502.4 | 459.7 | 507.1 | 515.8 | 0.001a |
| Incomplete secondary | 119 (30.1) | 23 (34.3) | 56 (28.4) | 49 (30.5) | NSb |
| Complete secondary or higher | 276 (69.9) | 44 (65.7) | 56 (71.6) | 40 (69.5) | – |
| Academic | 142 (36.4) | 23 (35.4) | 67 (34.1) | 52 (40.0) | NSb |
| Vocational | 211 (53.9) | 32 (49.2) | 113 (57.7) | 66 (50.8) | – |
| Adult | 38 (9.7) | 10 (15.4) | 16 (8.2) | 12 (9.2) | – |
BMI: body mass index; GPA: grade-point average; NS: not significant; SD: standard deviation.
a One-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni adjustment.
b χ2 test.
Notes: Academic performance was measured using grade-point average. Diets with poor nutritional value items and high in fat, sugar, salt and calories were classified as unhealthy diets. Diets with highly processed foods that were low in fat were classified as fair diets. Nutrient rich diets were classified as healthy diets.
Fig. 1Mean scores in the tests for college admission and high school GPA in Chilean students by nutritional quality of diet, 2009–2012
Fig. 2Academic performance and nutritional quality of diet for Chilean students, 2009–2012
Associations between nutritional quality of diet, aged 16 years, and students’ performance in language tests, Chile, 2009–2012
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
| Unhealthy diet | 0.40 (0.18–0.89) | 0.41 (0.18–0.90) | 0.41 (0.18–0.92) | 0.42 (0.18–0.98) |
| Fair diet | 0.95 (0.58–1.57) | 0.92 (0.56–1.52) | 0.92 (0.56–1.52) | 0.99 (0.58–1.68) |
| BMI ( | – | 0.78 (0.63–0.96) | 0.78 (0.63–0.96) | 0.82 (0.65–1.02) |
| Incomplete maternal education | – | – | 0.84 (0.50–1.41) | 0.94 (0.61–1.85) |
| Female sex | – | – | 1.07 (0.67–1.71) | 0.95 (0.58–1.96) |
| Vocational high school | – | – | – | 0.24 (0.14–0.39) |
| Adult high school | – | – | – | 0.17 (0.06–0.52) |
BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.
Notes: Diets with poor nutritional value items and high in fat, sugar, salt and calories were classified as unhealthy diets. Diets with highly processed foods that were low in fat were classified as fair diets. Nutrient rich diets were classified as healthy diets. Reference group: participants with a healthy diet.
Associations between nutritional quality of diet, aged 16 years, and students’ performance in mathematics tests, Chile, 2009–2012
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
| Unhealthy diet | 0.42 (0.19–0.88) | 0.42 (0.20–0.89) | 0.43 (0.20–0.91) | 0.35 (0.15–0.82) |
| Fair diet | 0.60 (0.36–0.98) | 0.59 (0.36–0.97) | 0.58 (0.35–0.93) | 0.57 (0.32–0.99) |
| BMI (Z-score) | – | 0.92 (0.75–1.14) | 0.94 (0.76–1.15) | 0.96 (0.82–1.30) |
| Incomplete maternal education | – | – | 0.61 (0.35–1.04) | 0.83 (0.46–1.51) |
| Female sex | – | – | 0.93 (0.58–1.58) | 0.75 (0.44–1.25) |
| Vocational high school | – | – | – | 0.14 (0.08–0.25) |
| Adult high school | – | – | – | 0.06 (0.02–0.28) |
BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.
Notes: Diets with poor nutritional value items and high in fat, sugar, salt and calories were classified as unhealthy diets. Diets with highly processed foods that were low in fat were classified as fair diets. Nutrient rich diets were classified as healthy diets. Reference group: participants with a healthy diet.
Associations between nutritional quality of diet, aged 16 years, and students’ academic performance in high school, Chile, 2009–2012
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
| Unhealthy diet | 0.26 (0.11–0.61) | 0.26 (0.11–0.62) | 0.24 (0.09–0.58) | 0.22 (0.09–0.56) |
| Fair diet | 0.75 (0.46–1.21) | 0.73 (0.45–1.19) | 0.76 (0.44–1.20) | 0.75 (0.46–1.26) |
| BMI (Z-score) | – | 0.82 (0.67–1.01) | 0.80 (0.64–1.01) | 0.84 (0.68–1.05) |
| Incomplete maternal education | – | – | 0.89 (0.53–1.51) | 0.99 (0.58–1.70) |
| Male sex | – | – | 0.46 (0.28–0.74) | 0.49 (0.30–0.80) |
| Vocational high school | – | – | – | 0.62 (0.37–1.03) |
| Adult high school | – | – | – | 0.38 (0.14–1.07) |
BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.
Notes: Academic performance was measured using grade-point average. Diets with poor nutritional value items and high in fat, sugar, salt and calories were classified as unhealthy diets. Diets with highly processed foods that were low in fat were classified as fair diets. Nutrient rich diets were classified as healthy diets. Reference group: participants with a healthy diet.