Literature DB >> 26964472

Electric and acoustic stimulation during movement preparation can facilitate movement execution in healthy participants and stroke survivors.

Welber Marinovic1, Sandra G Brauer2, Kathryn S Hayward3, Timothy J Carroll2, Stephan Riek2.   

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in the use of loud acoustic stimulation (LAS) to gain insight into the preparation and initiation of motor actions. Typically, LAS presented during movement preparation in healthy participants culminates in the earlier than normal initiation of the prepared movement and an increase in the magnitude of the response. Recent reports have shown LAS can also facilitate movement in chronic stroke survivors. This suggests that current therapies for motor recovery after stroke might benefit from employing such alternate methods of triggering movement. In this study we sought to test a new way to facilitate motor actions that could be of relevance in clinical settings. Five individuals with chronic motor impairments due to stroke and eight healthy young adults performed a functional reaching task in response to a visual go-signal. On 30% of the trials, LAS or electric stimuli (collectively, sensory stimuli) were unexpectedly presented in synchrony with the go-signal. Both healthy and stroke participants reacted with shorter latencies and executed faster responses when sensory stimulation was synchronized with the go-signal. We have replicated previous findings showing acoustic stimuli can aid movement execution in chronic stroke survivors and demonstrated the same type of effect can be achieved using electric stimulation. Thus, these two types of sensory stimuli can be easily integrated with current devices available to assist people with stroke to engage in rehabilitation efforts.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor control; Reaching; Sensory stimulation; Stroke survivors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26964472     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  6 in total

1.  StartReact during gait initiation reveals differential control of muscle activation and inhibition in patients with corticospinal degeneration.

Authors:  Bas J H van Lith; Milou J M Coppens; Jorik Nonnekes; Bart P C van de Warrenburg; Alexander C Geurts; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Stabilizing stretch reflexes are modulated independently from the rapid release of perturbation-triggered motor plans.

Authors:  Hyunglae Lee; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Does exposure to startle impact voluntary reaching movements in individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke?

Authors:  Marziye Rahimi; Zoe Swann; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Evidence for startle as a measurable behavioral indicator of motor learning.

Authors:  Nathan J Kirkpatrick; Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Eric J Perreault; Sydney Y Schaefer; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Markus Kofler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A startling acoustic stimulus facilitates voluntary lower extremity movements and automatic postural responses in people with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Milou J M Coppens; Jolanda M B Roelofs; Nicole A J Donkers; Jorik Nonnekes; Alexander C H Geurts; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.849

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.