Literature DB >> 26963481

Adult age differences in information foraging in an interactive reading environment.

Xiaomei Liu1, Jessie Chin1, Brennan R Payne2, Wai-Tat Fu3, Daniel G Morrow1, Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow1.   

Abstract

When learning about a single topic in natural reading environments, readers are confronted with multiple sources varying in the type and amount of information. In this situation, readers are free to adaptively respond to the constraints of the environment (e.g., through selection of resources and time allocation for study), but there may be costs of exploring and switching between sources (e.g., disruption of attention, opportunity costs for study). From an ecological perspective, such properties of the environment are expected to influence learning strategies. In the current study, we used a novel reading paradigm to investigate age differences in the effects of information richness (i.e., sentence elaboration) and costs of switching between texts (i.e., time delay) on selection of sources and study time allocation. Consistent with the ecological view, participants progressed from less informative to more informative texts. Furthermore, increased switch cost led to a tendency to allocate more effort to easier materials and to greater persistence in reading, which in turn, led to better memory in both immediate and delayed recall. Older adults showed larger effects of switch cost, such that the age difference in delayed recall was eliminated in the high switch cost condition. Based on an ecological paradigm of reading that affords choice and self-regulation, our study provided evidence for preservation with age in the ability to adapt to changing learning environments so as to improve performance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26963481      PMCID: PMC4844864          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  32 in total

1.  Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning.

Authors:  J Dunlosky; C Hertzog
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 2.  Age Differences in Language Segmentation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Brennan R Payne
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  Discretionary task interleaving: heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging.

Authors:  Stephen J Payne; Geoffrey B Duggan; Hansjörg Neth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

4.  What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study.

Authors:  J Dunlosky; K W Thiede
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1998-03

5.  People's study time allocation and its relation to animal foraging.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; W Jake Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.

Authors:  L K Son; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect".

Authors:  T O Nelson; R J Leonesio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Self-regulated learning in younger and older adults: does aging affect metacognitive control?

Authors:  Jodi Price; Christopher Hertzog; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-10-28

9.  Cognitive aging and adaptive foraging behavior.

Authors:  Rui Mata; Andreas Wilke; Uwe Czienskowski
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Foraging across the life span: is there a reduction in exploration with aging?

Authors:  Rui Mata; Andreas Wilke; Uwe Czienskowski
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Caroline Seidel; Jeremy Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2019-08-15

2.  Loading… loading… The influence of download time on information search.

Authors:  Alyssa C Smith; Brandon C W Ralph; Jeremy Marty-Dugas; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.