Literature DB >> 26962712

Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Blocks: Does Varying Perineural Catheter Location Relative to the Sciatic Bifurcation Influence Block Effects? A Dual-Center, Randomized, Subject-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Amanda M Monahan1, Sarah J Madison, Vanessa J Loland, Jacklynn F Sztain, Michael L Bishop, NavParkash S Sandhu, Richard H Bellars, Bahareh Khatibi, Alexandra K Schwartz, Sonya S Ahmed, Michael C Donohue, Scott T Nomura, Cindy H Wen, Brian M Ilfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated that, for single-injection popliteal sciatic nerve blocks, block characteristics are dependent upon local anesthetic injection relative to the sciatic nerve bifurcation. In contrast, this relation remains unexamined for continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that postoperative analgesia is improved with the perineural catheter tip at the level of the bifurcation compared with 5 cm proximal to the bifurcation.
METHODS: Preoperatively, subjects having moderately painful foot or ankle surgery were randomly assigned to receive an ultrasound-guided subepimyseal perineural catheter inserted either at or 5 cm proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation. Subjects received a single injection of mepivacaine 1.5% either via the insertion needle preoperatively or the perineural catheter postoperatively, followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (6 mL/h basal, 4 mL bolus, and 30-min lockout) for the study duration. The primary end point was the average pain measured on a numeric rating scale (0-10) in the 3 hours before a data collection telephone call the morning after surgery.
RESULTS: The average numeric rating scale of subjects with a catheter inserted at the sciatic nerve bifurcation (n = 64) was a median (10th, 25th to 75th, and 90th quartiles) of 3.0 (0.0, 2.4-5.0, and 7.0) vs 2.0 (0.0, 1.0-4.0, and 5.0) for subjects with a catheter inserted proximal to the bifurcation (n = 64; P = 0.008). Similarly, maximum pain scores were greater in the group at the bifurcation: 6.0 (3.0, 4.4-8.0, and 9.0) vs 5.0 (0.0, 3.0-8.0, and 10.0) (P = 0.019). Differences between the groups for catheter insertion time, opioid rescue dose, degree of numbness in the foot/toes, catheter dislodgement, and fluid leakage did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: For continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks, a catheter inserted 5 cm proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation provides superior postoperative analgesia in subjects having moderately painful foot or ankle surgery compared with catheters located at the bifurcation. This is in marked contrast with single-injection popliteal sciatic nerve blocks for which benefits are afforded to local anesthetic injection distal, rather than proximal, to the bifurcation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26962712      PMCID: PMC4840064          DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  25 in total

1.  High-definition ultrasound imaging defines the paraneural sheath and the fascial compartments surrounding the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Karmakar; Ali Nima Shariat; Pawinee Pangthipampai; Junping Chen
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  The paraneural compartment: a new destination?

Authors:  Faraj W Abdallah; Vincent W Chan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Anatomical basis for sciatic nerve block at the knee level.

Authors:  Fabiano Timbó Barbosa; Tatiana Rosa Bezerra Wanderley Barbosa; Rafael Martins da Cunha; Amanda Karine Barros Rodrigues; Fernando Wagner da Silva Ramos; Célio Fernando de Sousa-Rodrigues
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-03-18

4.  The division of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa: anatomical implications for popliteal nerve blockade.

Authors:  J D Vloka; A Hadzić; E April; D M Thys
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  The enhancement of sensory blockade by clonidine selectively added to mepivacaine after midhumeral block.

Authors:  H Iskandar; E Guillaume; F Dixmérias; B Binje; S Rakotondriamihary; R Thiebaut; P Maurette
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  A randomized comparison between bifurcation and prebifurcation subparaneural popliteal sciatic nerve blocks.

Authors:  De Q H Tran; Andrea P González; Francisca Bernucci; Kevin Pham; Roderick J Finlayson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods.

Authors:  Joan E Broderick; Joseph E Schwartz; Gregory Vikingstad; Michelle Pribbernow; Steven Grossman; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Continuous infraclavicular perineural infusion with clonidine and ropivacaine compared with ropivacaine alone: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Timothy E Morey; F Kayser Enneking
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Timothy E Morey; R Doris Wang; F Kayser Enneking
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Subparaneural versus circumferential extraneural injection at the bifurcation level in ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Olivier Choquet; Guillaume Brault Noble; Bertrand Abbal; Didier Morau; Sophie Bringuier; Xavier Capdevila
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of self-coiling catheters for continuous popliteal sciatic block on postoperative pain level and dislocation rate: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rosa Nickl; Oliver Vicent; Thomas Müller; Anne Osmers; Konrad Schubert; Thea Koch; Torsten Richter
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.376

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.