Literature DB >> 12933390

Continuous infraclavicular perineural infusion with clonidine and ropivacaine compared with ropivacaine alone: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.

Brian M Ilfeld1, Timothy E Morey, F Kayser Enneking.   

Abstract

Although clonidine has been shown to increase the duration of local anesthetic action and prolong postoperative analgesia when included in single-injection nerve blocks, a controlled investigation of the efficacy of this practice to improve analgesia for continuous perineural local anesthetic infusion has not been reported. In this study, ambulatory patients (n = 34) undergoing moderately painful upper extremity orthopedic surgery received an infraclavicular brachial plexus block (mepivacaine 1.5%, epinephrine 2.5 micro g/mL, and bicarbonate 0.1 mEq/mL) and a perineural catheter before surgery. After surgery, patients were discharged home with a portable infusion pump delivering either ropivacaine 0.2% or ropivacaine 0.2% plus clonidine 1 micro g/mL via the catheter for 3 days (basal, 8 mL/h; patient-controlled bolus, 2 mL every 20 min). Investigators and patients were blinded to random group assignment. Daily end-points included pain scores, patient-controlled bolus doses, oral analgesic use, sleep quality, and symptoms of catheter- or infusion-related complications. Adding clonidine to ropivacaine resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the number of self-administered 2-mL bolus doses on postoperative Days 0 and 1 (P < 0.02), but this decreased actual local anesthetic consumption by an average of only 2-7 mL/d (P < 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for any of the other variables investigated, including sleep quality or oral analgesic requirements. We conclude that adding 1 micro g/mL of clonidine to a ropivacaine infraclavicular perineural infusion does not provide clinically relevant improvements in analgesia, sleep quality, or oral analgesic requirements for ambulatory patients having moderately painful upper extremity surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12933390     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000075840.52964.a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

Review 1.  Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 2.  Anaesthetic agents for advanced regional anaesthesia: a North American perspective.

Authors:  Chester C Buckenmaier; Lisa L Bleckner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Effect of adjuvant drugs on the action of local anesthetics in isolated rat sciatic nerves.

Authors:  Eser Yilmaz-Rastoder; Michael S Gold; Karen A Hough; G F Gebhart; Brian A Williams
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Blocks: Does Varying Perineural Catheter Location Relative to the Sciatic Bifurcation Influence Block Effects? A Dual-Center, Randomized, Subject-Masked, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amanda M Monahan; Sarah J Madison; Vanessa J Loland; Jacklynn F Sztain; Michael L Bishop; NavParkash S Sandhu; Richard H Bellars; Bahareh Khatibi; Alexandra K Schwartz; Sonya S Ahmed; Michael C Donohue; Scott T Nomura; Cindy H Wen; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.108

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.