BACKGROUND: The dietary sodium-to-potassium ratio (Na:K) is shown to be more strongly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD-related mortality than either sodium or potassium intake alone. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to estimate the Na:K in the diet of US adults. METHODS: Among US adults from the 2011-2012 NHANES (≥20 y; 2393 men and 2337 women), the National Cancer Institute method was used to estimate sodium and potassium intakes, Na:K, and the percentage of individuals with Na:K <1.0 utilizing the complex, stratified, multistage probability cluster sampling design. RESULTS: Overall, women had a significantly lower Na:K than men (mean ± SE: 1.32 ± 0.02 compared with 1.45 ± 0.02). Non-Hispanic whites had a significantly lower Na:K than non-Hispanic blacks and non-Hispanic Asians (1.34 ± 0.02 compared with 1.54 ± 0.03 and 1.49 ± 0.04, respectively). Only 12.2% ± 1.5% of US adults had a Na:K < 1.0. The Na:K decreased linearly as age increased. Most adults (90% ± 0.8%) had sodium intakes >2300 mg/d, whereas <3% had potassium intakes >4700 mg/d. Grains and vegetables were among the highest contributors to sodium intakes for adults with Na:K < 1.0, compared with protein foods and grains for those with Na:K ≥ 1.0. Vegetables and milk and dairy products constituted the primary dietary sources of potassium for individuals with Na:K < 1.0, whereas mixed dishes and protein foods contributed the most potassium for individuals with ratios ≥1.0. Individuals with a Na:K < 1.0 were less likely to consume mixed dishes and condiments and were more likely to consume vegetables, milk and dairy products, and fruit than those with a Na:K ≥ 1.0. CONCLUSION: Only about one-tenth of US adults have a Na:K consistent with the WHO guidelines for reduced risk of mortality. Continued efforts to reduce sodium intake in tandem with novel strategies to increase potassium intake are warranted.
BACKGROUND: The dietary sodium-to-potassium ratio (Na:K) is shown to be more strongly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD-related mortality than either sodium or potassium intake alone. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to estimate the Na:K in the diet of US adults. METHODS: Among US adults from the 2011-2012 NHANES (≥20 y; 2393 men and 2337 women), the National Cancer Institute method was used to estimate sodium and potassium intakes, Na:K, and the percentage of individuals with Na:K <1.0 utilizing the complex, stratified, multistage probability cluster sampling design. RESULTS: Overall, women had a significantly lower Na:K than men (mean ± SE: 1.32 ± 0.02 compared with 1.45 ± 0.02). Non-Hispanic whites had a significantly lower Na:K than non-Hispanic blacks and non-Hispanic Asians (1.34 ± 0.02 compared with 1.54 ± 0.03 and 1.49 ± 0.04, respectively). Only 12.2% ± 1.5% of US adults had a Na:K < 1.0. The Na:K decreased linearly as age increased. Most adults (90% ± 0.8%) had sodium intakes >2300 mg/d, whereas <3% had potassium intakes >4700 mg/d. Grains and vegetables were among the highest contributors to sodium intakes for adults with Na:K < 1.0, compared with protein foods and grains for those with Na:K ≥ 1.0. Vegetables and milk and dairy products constituted the primary dietary sources of potassium for individuals with Na:K < 1.0, whereas mixed dishes and protein foods contributed the most potassium for individuals with ratios ≥1.0. Individuals with a Na:K < 1.0 were less likely to consume mixed dishes and condiments and were more likely to consume vegetables, milk and dairy products, and fruit than those with a Na:K ≥ 1.0. CONCLUSION: Only about one-tenth of US adults have a Na:K consistent with the WHO guidelines for reduced risk of mortality. Continued efforts to reduce sodium intake in tandem with novel strategies to increase potassium intake are warranted.
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Laurence S Freedman; John M Commins; James E Moler; Walter Willett; Lesley F Tinker; Amy F Subar; Donna Spiegelman; Donna Rhodes; Nancy Potischman; Marian L Neuhouser; Alanna J Moshfegh; Victor Kipnis; Lenore Arab; Ross L Prentice Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Janet A Tooze; Douglas Midthune; Kevin W Dodd; Laurence S Freedman; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Amy F Subar; Patricia M Guenther; Raymond J Carroll; Victor Kipnis Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2006-10
Authors: Alanna J Moshfegh; Donna G Rhodes; David J Baer; Theophile Murayi; John C Clemens; William V Rumpler; David R Paul; Rhonda S Sebastian; Kevin J Kuczynski; Linda A Ingwersen; Robert C Staples; Linda E Cleveland Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Donna G Rhodes; Theophile Murayi; John C Clemens; David J Baer; Rhonda S Sebastian; Alanna J Moshfegh Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: L J Appel; T J Moore; E Obarzanek; W M Vollmer; L P Svetkey; F M Sacks; G A Bray; T M Vogt; J A Cutler; M M Windhauser; P H Lin; N Karanja Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Laurence Freedman; Sheila Bingham; Nicholas E Day; Elio Riboli; Pietro Ferrari; Raymond J Carroll Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: D A Sica; A D Struthers; W C Cushman; M Wood; J S Banas; M Epstein Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Laura Kehoe; Janette Walton; Sinead M Hopkins; Breige A McNulty; Anne P Nugent; Albert Flynn Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Martin N Thomson; Wolfgang Schneider; Kerim Mutig; David H Ellison; Ralph Kettritz; Sebastian Bachmann Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2018-11-28
Authors: Michelle M Averill; Rebekah L Young; Alexis C Wood; Emily O Kurlak; Holly Kramer; Lyn Steffen; Robyn L McClelland; Joseph A Delaney; Adam Drewnowski Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Pedro Moreira; Ana S Sousa; Rita S Guerra; Alejandro Santos; Nuno Borges; Cláudia Afonso; Teresa F Amaral; Patrícia Padrão Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 3.894