François Montastruc1,2,3, Francesco Salvo4, Mickaël Arnaud4, Bernard Bégaud4,5, Antoine Pariente4,5. 1. INSERM, U1219-Pharmacoepidemiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France. francois.montastruc@univ-tlse3.fr. 2. Service de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique, Faculté de Médecine, CHU Toulouse, 37 alles Jules Guesde, 31000, Toulouse, France. francois.montastruc@univ-tlse3.fr. 3. French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres Network, Bordeaux, France. francois.montastruc@univ-tlse3.fr. 4. INSERM, U1219-Pharmacoepidemiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France. 5. French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres Network, Bordeaux, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Investigations have highlighted the lack of evidence regarding the likelihood of congenital malformations following exposure to antipsychotic drugs during pregnancy. To gain further knowledge regarding their safety, we evaluated signals of congenital malformations with antipsychotics using VigiBase(®), the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database. METHOD: A case/non-case study was conducted in VigiBase(®) between 1967 and 2014. Signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) were detected using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), which defines SDRs as drug-report associations with a PRR ≥2, Chi square ≥4, and number of cases ≥3. SDR detection for antipsychotics was performed for congenital malformations after removing all reports related to drug competitors and reports of movement disorders from the database. RESULTS: After removing reports related to drug competitors (antiepileptics, antidepressants, antivirals) and movement disorders, three signals were revealed: 'palate disorders congenital' (PRR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.6-2.9, Chi square = 30; n = 41), 'oesophageal disorders congenital' (PRR 2.5, 95 % CI 1.3-4.7, Chi square = 11; n = 10) and 'anorectal disorders congenital' (PRR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.6-5.6, Chi square = 13; n = 11). Among antipsychotics, phenothiazines with a piperazine side-chain, risperidone and aripiprazole appeared to be more suspect. CONCLUSION: Confirming a first signal from spontaneous reporting data, three SDRs for antipsychotics and gastrointestinal congenital abnormalities were unmasked in VigiBase(®). This signal should be further explored by ad hoc pharmacoepidemiologic studies in order to assess whether it is relevant for prescription and public health.
INTRODUCTION: Investigations have highlighted the lack of evidence regarding the likelihood of congenital malformations following exposure to antipsychotic drugs during pregnancy. To gain further knowledge regarding their safety, we evaluated signals of congenital malformations with antipsychotics using VigiBase(®), the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database. METHOD: A case/non-case study was conducted in VigiBase(®) between 1967 and 2014. Signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) were detected using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), which defines SDRs as drug-report associations with a PRR ≥2, Chi square ≥4, and number of cases ≥3. SDR detection for antipsychotics was performed for congenital malformations after removing all reports related to drug competitors and reports of movement disorders from the database. RESULTS: After removing reports related to drug competitors (antiepileptics, antidepressants, antivirals) and movement disorders, three signals were revealed: 'palate disorders congenital' (PRR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.6-2.9, Chi square = 30; n = 41), 'oesophageal disorders congenital' (PRR 2.5, 95 % CI 1.3-4.7, Chi square = 11; n = 10) and 'anorectal disorders congenital' (PRR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.6-5.6, Chi square = 13; n = 11). Among antipsychotics, phenothiazines with a piperazine side-chain, risperidone and aripiprazole appeared to be more suspect. CONCLUSION: Confirming a first signal from spontaneous reporting data, three SDRs for antipsychotics and gastrointestinal congenital abnormalities were unmasked in VigiBase(®). This signal should be further explored by ad hoc pharmacoepidemiologic studies in order to assess whether it is relevant for prescription and public health.
Authors: Mickael Arnaud; Francesco Salvo; Ismaïl Ahmed; Philip Robinson; Nicholas Moore; Bernard Bégaud; Pascale Tubert-Bitter; Antoine Pariente Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Catherine G Coughlin; Katherine A Blackwell; Christine Bartley; Madeleine Hay; Kimberly A Yonkers; Michael H Bloch Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Vaishali K Patadia; Martijn J Schuemie; Preciosa Coloma; Ron Herings; Johan van der Lei; Sabine Straus; Miriam Sturkenboom; Gianluca Trifirò Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2014-12-09
Authors: Sengwee Toh; Qian Li; T Craig Cheetham; William O Cooper; Robert L Davis; Sascha Dublin; Tarek A Hammad; De-Kun Li; Pamala A Pawloski; Simone P Pinheiro; Marsha A Raebel; Pamela E Scott; David H Smith; William V Bobo; Jean M Lawrence; Inna Dashevsky; Katherine Haffenreffer; Lyndsay A Avalos; Susan E Andrade Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Alana Cavadino; Lovisa Sandberg; Inger Öhman; Tomas Bergvall; Kristina Star; Helen Dolk; Maria Loane; Marie-Claude Addor; Ingeborg Barisic; Clara Cavero-Carbonell; Ester Garne; Miriam Gatt; Babak Khoshnood; Kari Klungsøyr; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Nathalie Lelong; Reneé Lutke; Anna Materna-Kiryluk; Vera Nelen; Amanda Nevill; Mary O'Mahony; Olatz Mokoroa; Anna Pierini; Hanitra Randrianaivo; Anke Rissmann; David Tucker; Awi Wiesel; Lyubov Yevtushok; Joan K Morris Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2021-05-09 Impact factor: 5.606