Literature DB >> 26960910

Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies.

Teresa A Myers, John Kotcher1, Neil Stenhouse2, Ashley A Anderson3, Edward Maibach, Lindsey Beall1, Anthony Leiserowitz4.   

Abstract

In this article, we focus on a key strategic objective of scientific organizations: maintaining the trust of the public. Using data from a nationally representative survey of American adults ( n = 1510), we assess the extent to which demographic factors and political ideology are associated with citizens' trust in general science and climate science research conducted by US federal agencies. Finally, we test whether priming individuals to first consider agencies' general science research influences trust in their climate science research, and vice versa. We found that federal agencies' general science research is more trusted than their climate science research-although a large minority of respondents did not have an opinion-and that political ideology has a strong influence on public trust in federal scientific research. We also found that priming participants to consider general scientific research does not increase trust in climate scientific research. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate science; public opinion; trust

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26960910     DOI: 10.1177/0963662516636040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  9 in total

1.  Political Ideology, Confidence in Science, and Participation in Alzheimer Disease Research Studies.

Authors:  Matthew Gabel; Jonathan Gooblar; Catherine M Roe; Natalie J Selsor; John C Morris
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

2.  Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates.

Authors:  Lindsey Beall; Teresa A Myers; John E Kotcher; Emily K Vraga; Edward W Maibach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility.

Authors:  Emily Vraga; Teresa Myers; John Kotcher; Lindsey Beall; Ed Maibach
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  The credibility of scientific communication sources regarding climate change: A population-based survey experiment.

Authors:  Luis Sanz-Menéndez; Laura Cruz-Castro
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-04-17

5.  The ideological divide in confidence in science and participation in medical research.

Authors:  Matthew Gabel; Jonathan Gooblar; Catherine M Roe; John C Morris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Exploring the Role of Trust in Scientists to Explain Health-Related Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Ebru Zeynep Muğaloğlu; Zeynep Kaymaz; Muhammet Emin Mısır; Canan Laçin-Şimşek
Journal:  Sci Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.921

7.  Climate denial in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  Shelley Boulianne; Stephanie Belland
Journal:  Can Rev Sociol       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 8.  Public trust and mistrust of climate science: A meta-narrative review.

Authors:  Antoinette Fage-Butler; Loni Ledderer; Kristian Hvidtfelt Nielsen
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2022-08-10

9.  Policy liberalism and source of news predict pandemic-related health behaviors and trust in the scientific community.

Authors:  Madeleine Reinhardt; Matthew B Findley; Renee A Countryman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.