| Literature DB >> 26958096 |
Tamar Kezeli1, Tamari Rukhadze1, Nikoloz Gongadze2, Galina Sukoyan3, Nino Dolidze4, Mariam Chipashvili1, Makrine Mirziashvili2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anti-ischemic effects of NO releasing by nitroglycerin (NTG) and the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) are involved in the decrease of vascular remodeling in different cardiovascular diseases. Using a nitrate-free period is still generally required to prevent nitrate tolerance and should be used as the first-line option to maintain adequate symptom control and on an individual basis. Personalized anti-ischemic concerns require the urgent change of paradigm from interventional measures to predictive, preventive, and personalized treatment with organic nitrates and its combination with drugs that may improve prognosis and drugs that can be added for patients who remain symptomatic despite therapy with the other classes of agents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of human calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist (CGRP8-37) on cardiohemodynamic events, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) plasma concentration, the severity of ventricular arrhythmias, and mortality occurring during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in NTG-tolerant and nontolerant rats.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Baroreflex sensitivity; Calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist; Hemodynamic; Mortality; Nitroglycerine tolerance; Predictive preventive personalized medicine; Prostaglandin E2; Ventricular arrhythmias
Year: 2016 PMID: 26958096 PMCID: PMC4782301 DOI: 10.1186/s13167-016-0055-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EPMA J ISSN: 1878-5077 Impact factor: 6.543
The influence of NTG on the mortality in NTG-tolerant rats with acute myocardial infarction
| Group of animals | Mortality | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–24 h | 24–48 h | 48–72 h | |
| Control ( | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| Total = 10/18 (56 %) | |||
| I—NTG-tolerant ( | 11 | 3 | – |
| Total = 14/20 (70 %) | |||
| II—NTG-tolerant + CGRP antagonist ( | 18 | – | – |
| Total = 18/20 (90 %) | |||
Note: comparison the same as Table 3
The influence of NTG on arrhythmias in NTG-tolerant rats with acute myocardial infarction
| Group of animals | Monitoring started after 1 h of AMI and lasted during 1 h | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VT | VPBs | VF | ||||
| Number of animals having VT | Average duration in seconds in each animal | Number of animals having VPBs | Average number of VPBs in each animal | Number of animals having VF | Average duration in seconds in each animal | |
| Control, | 6 | 9 ± 2 | 12 | 440 ± 30 | – | – |
| I—NTG, | 11 | 19 ± 4** | 7 | 520 ± 24* | 2 | 66 ± 12 |
| II—NTG + CGRP antagonist, | 13 | 24 ± 6** | 4 | 668 ± 52**# | 3 | 85 ± 14# |
VT ventricular tachycardia, VPBs ventricular premature beats, VF ventricular fibrillation, n number of animals in each group
Difference with the control group: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; difference with the I—NTG-tolerant group: # p < 0.05
The NTG-induced cardiohemodynamic alterations in different groups of rats with acute myocardial infarction
| Parameters | Animal groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (nontolerant), | I—NTG-tolerant, | II—NTG-tolerant + CGRP antagonist, | ||||
| a | b | a | b | a | b | |
| BP (mmHg) | 115 ± 6 | −28.4 ± 2.5 | 109 ± 5 | −16.2 ± 1.6* | 110 ± 8 | −8.8 ± 1.2***### |
| HP (ms) | 158 ± 7 | −25.6 ± 3.8 | 151 ± 5 | −11.0 ± 1.2* | 147 ± 6 | 5.2 ± 1.4***### |
| BRS (ms/mmHg) | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.66 ± 0.05** | 0.58 ± 0.04** | |||
BP blood pressure, HP heart period, BRS baroreflex sensitivity, a initial values, b after NTG injection, n number of animals
Difference with the control group: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; difference with the I—NTG-tolerant group: ### p < 0.001
Fig. 1Effect of NTG (50 mg/kg) s.c. 30 min prior to AMI on the blood content of PGE2 in different groups of rats with myocardial ischemia. C control group (n = 18), I NTG-tolerant (n = 20), II NTG-tolerant + CGRP antagonist (n = 20)