Literature DB >> 26956562

Testing Multiple Psychological Processes for Common Neural Mechanisms Using EEG and Independent Component Analysis.

Jan R Wessel1,2.   

Abstract

Temporal independent component analysis (ICA) is applied to an electrophysiological signal mixture (such as an EEG recording) to disentangle the independent neural source signals-independent components-underlying said signal mixture. When applied to scalp EEG, ICA is most commonly used either as a pre-processing step (e.g., to isolate physiological processes from non-physiological artifacts), or as a data-reduction step (i.e., to focus on one specific neural process with increased signal-to-noise ratio). However, ICA can be used in an even more powerful way that fundamentally expands the inferential utility of scalp EEG. The core assumption of EEG-ICA-namely, that individual independent components represent separable neural processes-can be leveraged to derive the following inferential logic: If a specific independent component shows activity related to multiple psychological processes within the same dataset (e.g., elicited by different experimental events), it follows that those psychological processes involve a common, non-separable neural mechanism. As such, this logic allows testing a class of hypotheses that is beyond the reach of regular EEG analyses techniques, thereby crucially increasing the inferential utility of the EEG. In the current article, this logic will be referred to as the 'common independent process identification' (CIPI) approach. This article aims to provide a tutorial into the application of this powerful approach, targeted at researchers that have a basic understanding of standard EEG analysis. Furthermore, the article aims to exemplify the usage of CIPI by outlining recent studies that successfully applied this approach to test neural theories of mental functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blind source separation; Common neural mechanisms; EEG; Independent component analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26956562     DOI: 10.1007/s10548-016-0483-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  9 in total

Review 1.  On the Globality of Motor Suppression: Unexpected Events and Their Influence on Behavior and Cognition.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Isabella C Dutra; Darcy A Waller; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Establishing a Right Frontal Beta Signature for Stopping Action in Scalp EEG: Implications for Testing Inhibitory Control in Other Task Contexts.

Authors:  Johanna Wagner; Jan R Wessel; Ayda Ghahremani; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Common neural processes during action-stopping and infrequent stimulus detection: The frontocentral P3 as an index of generic motor inhibition.

Authors:  Darcy A Waller; Eliot Hazeltine; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Surprise disrupts cognition via a fronto-basal ganglia suppressive mechanism.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Ned Jenkinson; John-Stuart Brittain; Sarah H E M Voets; Tipu Z Aziz; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Semantic anomaly detection in school-aged children during natural sentence reading - A study of fixation-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Otto Loberg; Jarkko Hautala; Jarmo A Hämäläinen; Paavo H T Leppänen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Preventing a Thought from Coming to Mind Elicits Increased Right Frontal Beta Just as Stopping Action Does.

Authors:  Anna Castiglione; Johanna Wagner; Michael Anderson; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; David E Huber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Unexpected Sounds Nonselectively Inhibit Active Visual Stimulus Representations.

Authors:  Cheol Soh; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.357

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.