Literature DB >> 26953299

Retail Clinic Visits For Low-Acuity Conditions Increase Utilization And Spending.

J Scott Ashwood1, Martin Gaynor2, Claude M Setodji3, Rachel O Reid4, Ellerie Weber5, Ateev Mehrotra6.   

Abstract

Retail clinics have been viewed by policy makers and insurers as a mechanism to decrease health care spending, by substituting less expensive clinic visits for more expensive emergency department or physician office visits. However, retail clinics may actually increase spending if they drive new health care utilization. To assess whether retail clinic visits represent new utilization or a substitute for more expensive care, we used insurance claims data from Aetna for the period 2010-12 to track utilization and spending for eleven low-acuity conditions. We found that 58 percent of retail clinic visits for low-acuity conditions represented new utilization and that retail clinic use was associated with a modest increase in spending, of $14 per person per year. These findings do not support the idea that retail clinics decrease health care spending. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost of Health Care; Health Spending; Organization and Delivery of Care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26953299     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  11 in total

1.  Patterns of Use and Correlates of Patient Satisfaction with a Large Nationwide Direct to Consumer Telemedicine Service.

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Mark Rood; Nikhyl Jhangiani; Lei Kou; Susannah Rose; Adrienne Boissy; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Trends in Visits to Acute Care Venues for Treatment of Low-Acuity Conditions in the United States From 2008 to 2015.

Authors:  Sabrina J Poon; Jeremiah D Schuur; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Patients' preferences over care settings for minor illnesses and injuries.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Heather Ladd; Alpesh Amin; Dara H Sorkin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Transformation Support Provided Remotely to a National Cohort of Optometry Practices.

Authors:  Ronald N Adler; Warren J Ferguson; Hussein Antar; Michael Steinkrauss; Brian Bjoern; Valerie Konar; Jay Flanagan; David F Polakoff
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Essential Attributes for the Community Pharmacist as Care Provider.

Authors:  Teresa A O'Sullivan; Erin Sy; Jennifer L Bacci
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Effect of Retail Clinic Use on Continuity of Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  N Ogechi Abara; Nicole Huang; Mukaila A Raji; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  The impact of urgent care centers on nonemergent emergency department visits.

Authors:  Lindsay Allen; Janet R Cummings; Jason M Hockenberry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.734

8.  Virtual Visits and Patient-Centered Care: Results of a Patient Survey and Observational Study.

Authors:  Kimberlyn Marie McGrail; Megan Alyssa Ahuja; Chad Andrew Leaver
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Virtual Visits for Acute, Nonurgent Care: A Claims Analysis of Episode-Level Utilization.

Authors:  Aliza S Gordon; Wallace C Adamson; Andrea R DeVries
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Study protocol: effects, costs and distributional impact of digital primary care for infectious diseases-an observational, registry-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Jens Wilkens; Hans Thulesius; Eva Arvidsson; Anna Lindgren; Bjorn Ekman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.