Literature DB >> 26952688

Estimating Surgical Procedure Times Using Anesthesia Billing Data and Operating Room Records.

Lane F Burgette1, Andrew W Mulcahy1, Ateev Mehrotra2,3, Teague Ruder1, Barbara O Wynn1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The median time required to perform a surgical procedure is important in determining payment under Medicare's physician fee schedule. Prior studies have demonstrated that the current methodology of using physician surveys to determine surgical times results in overstated times. To measure surgical times more accurately, we developed and validated a methodology using available data from anesthesia billing data and operating room (OR) records. DATA SOURCES: We estimated surgical times using Medicare 2011 anesthesia claims and New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System 2011 OR times. Estimated times were validated using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We compared our time estimates to those used by Medicare in the fee schedule. STUDY
DESIGN: We estimate surgical times via piecewise linear median regression models. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Using 3.0 million observations of anesthesia and OR times, we estimated surgical time for 921 procedures. Correlation between these time estimates and directly measured surgical time from the validation database was 0.98. Our estimates of surgical time were shorter than the Medicare fee schedule estimates for 78 percent of procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia and OR times can be used to measure surgical time and thereby improve the payment for surgical procedures in the Medicare fee schedule. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Keywords:  Intraservice time; Medicare; resource-based relative value scale

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26952688      PMCID: PMC5264104          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  11 in total

1.  Missing productivity gains in the Medicare physician Fee Schedule: where are they?

Authors:  Jerry Cromwell; Nancy McCall; Kathleen Dalton; Peter Braun
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Validating CPT typical times for Medicare office evaluation and management (E/M) services.

Authors:  Jerry Cromwell; Sonja Hoover; Nancy McCall; Peter Braun
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Estimating anesthesia and surgical procedure times from medicare anesthesia claims.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Xuemei Zhang; Orit Even-Shoshan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Validation of physician survey estimates of surgical time using operating room logs.

Authors:  Nancy McCall; Jerry Cromwell; Peter Braun
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the Physician Fee Schedule, Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule, access to identifiable data for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Models & other revisions to Part B for CY 2015. Final rule with comment period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2014-11-13

7.  Results and policy implications of the resource-based relative-value study.

Authors:  W C Hsiao; P Braun; D Dunn; E R Becker; M DeNicola; T R Ketcham
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Development of a Model for the Validation of Work Relative Value Units for the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

Authors:  Barbara O Wynn; Lane F Burgette; Andrew W Mulcahy; Edward N Okeke; Ian Brantley; Neema Iyer; Teague Ruder; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2015-07-15

9.  Estimating anesthesia time using the medicare claim: a validation study.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Orit Even-Shoshan; Lanyu Mi; Fabienne A Kyle; Yun Teng; Dale W Bratzler; Lee A Fleisher
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  A comparison of ambulatory perioperative times in hospitals and freestanding centers.

Authors:  Brionna Hair; Peter Hussey; Barbara Wynn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  6 in total

1.  Regarding "Committee Representation and Medicare Reimbursements: An Examination of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale".

Authors:  Miriam J Laugesen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Assessment of the Contribution of the Work Relative Value Unit Scale to Differences in Physician Compensation Across Medical and Surgical Specialties.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Association of Work Measures and Specialty With Assigned Work Relative Value Units Among Surgeons.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Jill Q Dworsky; Marcia M Russell; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Variation in Estimated Surgical Procedure Times Across Patient Characteristics and Surgeon Specialty.

Authors:  Daniel J Crespin; Teague Ruder; Andrew W Mulcahy; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 16.681

5.  Surgical rescue for persistent head and neck cancer after first-line treatment.

Authors:  Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler; L Golm; D Dejaco; D Riedl; B Kofler; C Url; D Wolfram; H Riechelmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Current Relative Value Unit Scale Does Not Appropriately Compensate for Longer Orthopedic Sports Surgeries.

Authors:  Trevor Simcox; Jason Kreinces; Daniel Tarazona; Ioannis Zouzias; Mark Grossman
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-10-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.