Literature DB >> 17099125

Validation of physician survey estimates of surgical time using operating room logs.

Nancy McCall1, Jerry Cromwell, Peter Braun.   

Abstract

The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MFS) is based on relative value units that represent the costliness of a particular service compared to all other services. Comparison of current surgical time estimates show systematically longer times than those obtained in the original Harvard study more than a decade ago. Any bias in surgical time estimates is likely to distort MFS payments across specialties. This study is the first to use objectively collected intraservice surgical time to validate estimates of time collected from small-group physician surveys. Median intraservice time estimates are significantly longer than intraservice times from operative logs. The average difference across 60 procedures is 31 minutes; the range is from a few minutes to almost 2 hours. Given that half of the studied surgical procedures is a subset of services that anchors the MFS, surgical times for other related services are likely to be overstated as well.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17099125     DOI: 10.1177/1077558706293635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  11 in total

1.  In setting doctors' Medicare fees, CMS almost always accepts the relative value update panel's advice on work values.

Authors:  Miriam J Laugesen; Roy Wada; Eric M Chen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity.

Authors:  Dhruvil R Shah; Richard J Bold; Anthony D Yang; Vijay P Khatri; Steve R Martinez; Robert J Canter
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Regarding "Committee Representation and Medicare Reimbursements: An Examination of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale".

Authors:  Miriam J Laugesen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Estimating Surgical Procedure Times Using Anesthesia Billing Data and Operating Room Records.

Authors:  Lane F Burgette; Andrew W Mulcahy; Ateev Mehrotra; Teague Ruder; Barbara O Wynn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Time motion studies in healthcare: what are we talking about?

Authors:  Marcelo Lopetegui; Po-Yin Yen; Albert Lai; Joseph Jeffries; Peter Embi; Philip Payne
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Committee Representation and Medicare Reimbursements-An Examination of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

Authors:  Y Nina Gao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Assessment of the Contribution of the Work Relative Value Unit Scale to Differences in Physician Compensation Across Medical and Surgical Specialties.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Association of Work Measures and Specialty With Assigned Work Relative Value Units Among Surgeons.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Jill Q Dworsky; Marcia M Russell; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Variation in Estimated Surgical Procedure Times Across Patient Characteristics and Surgeon Specialty.

Authors:  Daniel J Crespin; Teague Ruder; Andrew W Mulcahy; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 16.681

10.  Differences in the Complexity of Office Visits by Physician Specialty: NAMCS 2013-2016.

Authors:  John D Goodson; Sara Shahbazi; Karthik Rao; Zirui Song
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.