Cori L Ofstead1, Evan M Doyle1, John E Eiland1, Miriam R Amelang1, Harry P Wetzler1, Dawn M England2, Kristin M Mascotti3, Michael J Shaw4. 1. Ofstead & Associates, Inc, St Paul, MN. 2. Department of Infection Prevention, University of Minnesota Health, Minneapolis, MN. 3. Department of Clinical Quality Improvement, University of Minnesota Health, Minneapolis, MN. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Experts have recommended microbiologic surveillance by external reference laboratories for certain flexible endoscopes. There is currently insufficient evidence on the feasibility and utility of cultures. Researchers evaluated a preassembled toolkit for collecting and processing samples from endoscopes. METHODS: A pilot study was performed in a large academic medical center. A toolkit was used to aseptically sample biopsy ports and suction/biopsy channels of 5 gastroscopes, 5 colonoscopes, and 5 bronchoscopes after full reprocessing. Blinded specimens were packaged and transported on icepacks to a reference laboratory that used standard methodologies for microbial cultures. RESULTS: The laboratory detected bacteria in samples from 60% of patient-ready endoscopes, including gram-positive and gram-negative species. Viable microbes (<10 CFU) were recovered from 2 gastroscopes, 3 colonoscopes, and 4 bronchoscopes. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Delftia acidovorans were recovered from all 3 endoscope types. Subsequent environmental testing detected S maltophilia in the reprocessing rinse water. CONCLUSIONS: A preassembled toolkit facilitated the aseptic collection of samples for culturing by a reference laboratory that detected viable microbes on fully reprocessed endoscopes. Speciation allowed identification of potential pathogens and a possible common contamination source, demonstrating that microbial cultures may have value even when colony counts are low.
BACKGROUND: Experts have recommended microbiologic surveillance by external reference laboratories for certain flexible endoscopes. There is currently insufficient evidence on the feasibility and utility of cultures. Researchers evaluated a preassembled toolkit for collecting and processing samples from endoscopes. METHODS: A pilot study was performed in a large academic medical center. A toolkit was used to aseptically sample biopsy ports and suction/biopsy channels of 5 gastroscopes, 5 colonoscopes, and 5 bronchoscopes after full reprocessing. Blinded specimens were packaged and transported on icepacks to a reference laboratory that used standard methodologies for microbial cultures. RESULTS: The laboratory detected bacteria in samples from 60% of patient-ready endoscopes, including gram-positive and gram-negative species. Viable microbes (<10 CFU) were recovered from 2 gastroscopes, 3 colonoscopes, and 4 bronchoscopes. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Delftia acidovorans were recovered from all 3 endoscope types. Subsequent environmental testing detected S maltophilia in the reprocessing rinse water. CONCLUSIONS: A preassembled toolkit facilitated the aseptic collection of samples for culturing by a reference laboratory that detected viable microbes on fully reprocessed endoscopes. Speciation allowed identification of potential pathogens and a possible common contamination source, demonstrating that microbial cultures may have value even when colony counts are low.
Authors: Cori L Ofstead; Brandy L Buro; Krystina M Hopkins; John E Eiland; Harry P Wetzler; David R Lichtenstein Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2020-11-17
Authors: Javier Flandes; Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid; Javier Alfayate; Iker Fernández-Navamuel; Carlos Agusti; Carmen M Lucena; Antoni Rosell; Felipe Andreo; Carmen Centeno; Carmen Montero; Iria Vidal; Lucía García-Alfonso; Antonio Bango; Miguel Ariza; Rocío Gallego; Marta Orta; Salvador Bello; Elisa Mincholé; Alfons Torrego; Virginia Pajares; Héctor González; Aurelio Luis Wangüemert; Julio Pérez-Izquierdo; Carlos Disdier; Blanca de Vega Sanchez; Rosa Cordovilla; Juan Cascón; Antonio Cruz; J Javier García-López; Luis Puente; Paola Benedetti; Cristina L García-Gallo; Gema Díaz Nuevo; Silvia Aguado; Concepción Partida; Prudencio Díaz-Agero; Estefanía Luque Crespo; María Pavón; Francisco Páez; Enrique Cases; Raquel Martínez; Andrés Briones; Cleofe Fernández; Concepción Martín Serrano; Ana Maria Uribe-Hernández; Jose Robles Journal: Respir Res Date: 2020-12-02
Authors: Cori L Ofstead; Krystina M Hopkins; Matthew J Binnicker; Gregory A Poland Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 3.254