Literature DB >> 26950640

Biochar has no effect on soil respiration across Chinese agricultural soils.

Xiaoyu Liu1, Jufeng Zheng2, Dengxiao Zhang3, Kun Cheng4, Huimin Zhou5, Afeng Zhang6, Lianqing Li7, Stephen Joseph8, Pete Smith9, David Crowley10, Yakov Kuzyakov11, Genxing Pan12.   

Abstract

Biochar addition to soil has been widely accepted as an option to enhance soil carbon sequestration by introducing recalcitrant organic matter. However, it remains unclear whether biochar will negate the net carbon accumulation by increasing carbon loss through CO2 efflux from soil (soil respiration). The objectives of this study were to address: 1) whether biochar addition increases soil respiration; and whether biochar application rate and biochar type (feedstock and pyrolyzing system) affect soil respiration. Two series of field experiments were carried out at 8 sites representing the main crop production areas in China. In experiment 1, a single type of wheat straw biochar was amended at rates of 0, 20 and 40 tha(-1) in four rice paddies and three dry croplands. In experiment 2, four types of biochar (varying in feedstock and pyrolyzing system) were amended at rates of 0 and 20 tha(-1) in a rice paddy under rice-wheat rotation. Results showed that biochar addition had no effect on CO2 efflux from soils consistently across sites, although it increased topsoil organic carbon stock by 38% on average. Meanwhile, CO2 efflux from soils amended with 40 t of biochar did not significantly higher than soils amended with 20 t of biochar. While the biochars used in Experiment 2 had different carbon pools and physico-chemical properties, they had no effect on soil CO2 efflux. The soil CO2 efflux following biochar addition could be hardly explained by the changes in soil physic-chemical properties and in soil microbial biomass. Thus, we argue that biochar will not negate the net carbon accumulation by increasing carbon loss through CO2 efflux in agricultural soils.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural soils; Biochar; Carbon stability; Greenhouse gas mitigation; Microbial activity; Soil respiration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26950640     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Chemolithotrophic processes in the bacterial communities on the surface of mineral-enriched biochars.

Authors:  Jun Ye; Stephen D Joseph; Mukan Ji; Shaun Nielsen; David R G Mitchell; Scott Donne; Joseph Horvat; Jianli Wang; Paul Munroe; Torsten Thomas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  An assessment of emergy, energy, and cost-benefits of grain production over 6 years following a biochar amendment in a rice paddy from China.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Lianqing Li; Kun Cheng; Chunying Ji; Qian Yue; Rongjun Bian; Genxing Pan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Popular wood and sugarcane bagasse biochars reduced uptake of chromium and lead by lettuce from mine-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Amir Zeb Khan; Sardar Khan; Tehreem Ayaz; Mark L Brusseau; Muhammad Amjad Khan; Javed Nawab; Said Muhammad
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Fluorescent characteristics of dissolved organic matter released from biochar and paddy soil incorporated with biochar.

Authors:  Jiakai Gao; Zhaoyong Shi; Haiming Wu; Jialong Lv
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Extractable pool of biochar controls on crop productivity rather than greenhouse gas emission from a rice paddy under rice-wheat rotation.

Authors:  Punhoon Khan Korai; Xin Xia; Xiaoyu Liu; Rongjun Bian; Morris Oduor Omondi; Alphonse Nahayo; Genxing Pan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.