The immunoregulatory cytokine Interleukin 10 (IL-10) protein is produced by various cells during the course of inflammatory disorders. Mainly, it downregulates pro-inflammatory cytokines, antigen presentation, and helper T cell activation. In this study, we show that the ratio of IL-10-producing cells was significantly increased in lineage negative (i.e., not T, B, or leukocyte cell lineages) cells than in lineage positive cells in lymphoid and peripheral tissues. We further observed that IL-10-producing innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), here called firstly ILC10, were increased in number in oxazolone-induced contact hypersensitivity (CHS) mice. In detail, IL-10-producing lineage negative cells were elevated in the axillary, inguinal lymph node, and ear tissues of CHS mice. Notably, the cells expressed classical ILC marker proteins such as CD45, CD127, and Sca-1. Altogether, our findings suggest for the first time that ILC10s are present in various physiological settings and could be involved in numerous immune responses as regulatory cells. [BMB Reports 2016; 49(5): 293-296].
The immunoregulatory cytokine Interleukin 10 (IL-10) protein is produced by various cells during the course of inflammatory disorders. Mainly, it downregulates pro-inflammatory cytokines, antigen presentation, and helper T cell activation. In this study, we show that the ratio of IL-10-producing cells was significantly increased in lineage negative (i.e., not T, B, or leukocyte cell lineages) cells than in lineage positive cells in lymphoid and peripheral tissues. We further observed that IL-10-producing innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), here called firstly ILC10, were increased in number in oxazolone-induced contact hypersensitivity (CHS) mice. In detail, IL-10-producing lineage negative cells were elevated in the axillary, inguinal lymph node, and ear tissues of CHSmice. Notably, the cells expressed classical ILC marker proteins such as CD45, CD127, and Sca-1. Altogether, our findings suggest for the first time that ILC10s are present in various physiological settings and could be involved in numerous immune responses as regulatory cells. [BMB Reports 2016; 49(5): 293-296].
Recent studies have shown that innate lymphoid cell (ILC) subsets participate in intestinal homeostasis, lymphoid organogenesis, cytotoxicity, tissue remodeling during wound healing, and early immune responses against foreign antigens by production of various cytokines or other mediators (1, 2). ILCs have been classified into three distinct subsets through cytokine profiles and transcription factors. The groups are typically named ILCs (ILC1s), ILC2s, and ILC3s on the basis of their ability to produce T helper (Th) 1, Th2, and Th17 cell-linked cytokines, respectively (3, 4). Briefly, ILC1s express the transcription factor T-bet and produce interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (5). ILC2s critically depend on transcription factor GATA3 for the development and production of Interleukin (IL)-5, IL-9, IL-13 and Amphiregulin (6-8). ILC3s require the orphan nuclear receptor RoRγt and produce IL-22 and IL-17A (9).The cytokine IL-10 is well known for regulating effector T cell immune responses, and inhibits the activation of myeloid lineage cells, such as suppression of MHC class II, B7-1/B7-2 expression, and pro-inflammatory cytokines production (10, 11). IL-10 is secreted by many different lymphoid and myeloid cells, such as T cells (particularly regulatory T cells), B cells (particularly regulatory B cells), natural killer (NK) cells, NKT cells, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) (12-17).Although ILCs have been well recognized as the effector cells in various inflammatory immune responses, the subset of IL-10-producing ILCs (ILC10s) has not yet been reported. In this study, we demonstrated for the first time that the ILC10 subset is present in lymphoid tissues and is largely increased under disease conditions.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In recent years, many studies on ILCs have focused on the characterization of their subsets through profiling of proinflammatory cytokine secretion and transcription factors (2, 3), but there was no evidence for a regulatory function of ILCs.In general, it is well established that T cells, B cells, and other leukocytes act as effector cells to protect the host from foreign antigens, including various pathogens. Although the cells were initially identified as potent effector immune cells in the process of various immune diseases, other subsets were additionally recognized as regulatory cells (10, 12). In particular, some regulatory roles are dependent on IL-10 in Tr1, regulatory B10 cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, or type 2 macrophages (M2) (12-23). However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no previously published report on the presence of regulatory subsets of ILCs.We hypothesized that IL-10-producing ILC10s may exist in various immune tissues. In this study, we tested first whether or not IL-10-producing cells would exist in lineage negative cells, which excludes T cells (CD3+), B cells (CD45R+), monocytes (CD11b+), erythrocytes (TER-119+), and neutrophils (Gr-1+), in control or CHSmice. Interestingly enough, we observed that an IL-10+Lin− subset was definitely present, albeit rarely, in the spleen, axillary lymph node (aLN), inguinal lymph node (iLN), and ear (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, the ratio of IL-10+/IL-10− cells was significantly higher in Lin− than in Lin+ cells from second lymphoid tissues such as spleen, aLN, and iLN, but not ear tissue in control (ACE) mice. We also found that the ratio of IL-10+/IL-10− Lin− cells in aLN and ear tissues significantly increased in CHSmice (Figs. 1A and 1B). Accordingly, the frequency and number of IL-10+Lin− cells were substantially increased in the aLN, iLN, and ear, whereas the spleen was unaffected (Fig. 2), suggesting that mostly local drained LN IL-10+Lin− cells, but not those from the spleen, are associated with inflammation in CHSmice.
Fig. 1.
IL-10 expression in lineage-negative cells in control or contact hypersensitivity mice. (A) Two days after being challenged with oxazolone, the frequency of lineage (Lin)+ or − and IL-10+ or − cells in spleen, aLN, iLN, and ear tissues was measured as described in “Materials and Methods.” (B) The ratio of IL-10+/IL-10− in Lin+ or − cells from contact hypersensitivity mice. Plots in (A) are representative images and data in (B) are the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; n.s., not significant. OXZ, ozaxolone; ACE, acetone; aLN, axillary lymph node; iLN, inguinal lymph node.
Fig. 2.
IL-10 expression in lineage-negative cells from various tissues in the contact hypersensitivity mouse model. (A) Shown are the representative gating strategies for flow cytometry analysis of splenic IL-10+Lin− cells from contact hypersensitivity mice. (B) The frequency and count of IL-10+Lin− cells were determined by flow cytometric analysis as described in “Materials and Methods.” Data are the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; n.s., not significant. OXZ, ozaxolone; ACE, acetone; aLN, axillary lymph node; iLN, inguinal lymph node.
The above results prompted us to investigate whether phenotypically IL10+Lin− cells contain a new subset of ILCs (24). Notably, some subsets of IL-10+Lin− cells expressed several typical ILC markers such as CD45, CD127, and Sca-1, but CD25 was expressed in a low amount. We also observed that the expression of Sca-1 was increased more in IL-10+Lin− cells than in IL-10−Lin− cells, but did not detect significant differences in CD45 and CD127 expression between IL-10+ and IL-10−Lin− cells (Fig. 2A). We also observed no phenotypical difference in CD25 expression on the spleen, aLN, and iLN-derived IL-10+ or IL-10−Lin− cells. However, compared to IL-10−Lin− cells, the expression of CD25 was markedly increased in IL-10+Lin− cells in CHS-induced ear tissues (Fig. 3). Finally, we found that the number of IL-10+ ILCs (ILC10, Lin−CD45+CD127+Sca-1+) was significantly increased in the spleen, aLN, iLN, and ear in CHSmice (Fig. 4), suggesting that IL-10-producing ILC10s are associated with regulation of CHS inflammation. Given, particularly, the critical role of T cells in the progress of CHS inflammation (25), it would be of interest to determine whether ILC10s could regulate T cells under pathological circumstances.
Fig. 3.
Characterization of IL-10-producing lineage negative cells. Expressions of typical innate lymphoid cell surface markers on IL-10+ or IL-10− in Lin− cells are shown. Histograms are representative images from three independent experiments. aLN, axillary lymph node; iLN, inguinal lymph node.
Fig. 4.
Population change of IL-10-producing innate lymphoid cells in contact hypersensitivity mouse model. (A) Dot plots show a representative analysis of IL-10 expression in splenic ILCs (Lin−CD45+CD127+Sca-1+) from contact hypersensitivity mice. (B) The number of IL-10+ cells in ILCs in spleen, aLN, iLN, and ear tissues were measured by flow cytometry as described in “Materials and Methods.” Data are the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. OXZ, ozaxolone; ACE, acetone; aLN, axillary lymph node; iLN, inguinal lymph node.
In summary, for the first time we identified the presence of a IL-10+ ILC (Lin−CD45+CD127+Sca-1+) subset in lymphoid tissues, spleen, LN, and ear tissue, which we call ILC10. We further suggest that ILC10s could regulate some inflammatory immune responses in contact hypersensitivity and possibly other inflammatory diseases. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the physiology of ILC10s in various immune processes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice
C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Orientbio (Seongnam, Korea) and housed in a specific pathogen-free animal facility at Konkuk University (Seoul, Korea) with a sterilized diet and autoclaved water, unless indicated otherwise. The mice used were between 6 and 8 weeks of age. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Konkuk University.
Induction of contact hypersensitivity in mice
Contact Hypersensitivity (CHS) was induced according to a previously reported method (18). Briefly, mice were sensitized with 25 μl of Oxazolone (100 mg/ml, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in Acetone/Olive Oil (4:1 v/v) on the shaved hind flank for 2 consecutive days. Five days later, mice were challenged by the application of 10 μl of oxazolone (10 mg/ml) on each ear. Two days after they were challenged with Oxazolone, single cells were isolated for flow cytometric analysis.
Flow cytometric analysis
Single-cell suspensions were isolated from the spleen, axillary, inguinal lymph node, and ear tissues. To detect intracellular IL-10 in lineage negative (Lin−) or Lin−CD45+CD127+Sca-1+ cells from each tissue type, isolated cells were re-suspended and incubated for 4h with Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate (PMA, 50 ng/ml; Sigma), Ionomycin (500 ng/ml; Sigma), and Brefeldin A (3 mg/ml; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). Before cell surface markers were stained, Fcγ receptors were blocked with Anti-CD16 and Anti-CD32 monoclonal antibodies (2.4G2, BD Biosciences). The antibodies against cell surface proteins were as follows: mouse hematopoietic lineage (anti-CD3 (17A2), anti-CD45R (B220, RA3-6B2), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-TER-119 (TER-119), and anti-Ly-G6 (Gr-1, RB6-8C5)), anti-CD127 (IL-7Rα, A7R34), Sca-1 (Ly-6A/E, D7), and anti-CD25 (PC61.5), which were purchased from eBioscience, and anti-CD45 (30-F11), which was purchased from BD Biosciences. Cells were fixed and permeabilized with a Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (eBioscience) and then were incubated with anti–IL-10 monoclonal antibody (JES5-16E3, eBioscience) at 4℃ for 30 min. Cells were analyzed with FACSAria or FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and FlowJo Version 10 software (TreeStar).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and the Student's t-test for unpaired values unless stated otherwise. Statistical significance (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01) was performed using the software SigmaStat (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
Authors: Hyuk Soon Kim; A-Ram Kim; Do Kyun Kim; Hyun Woo Kim; Young Hwan Park; Geun Hyo Jang; Bokyung Kim; Yeong Min Park; Jueng Soo You; Hyung Sik Kim; Michael A Beaven; Young Mi Kim; Wahn Soo Choi Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Anja Fuchs; William Vermi; Jacob S Lee; Silvia Lonardi; Susan Gilfillan; Rodney D Newberry; Marina Cella; Marco Colonna Journal: Immunity Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Koichi Yanaba; Jean-David Bouaziz; Karen M Haas; Jonathan C Poe; Manabu Fujimoto; Thomas F Tedder Journal: Immunity Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Roel G J Klein Wolterink; Nicolas Serafini; Menno van Nimwegen; Christian A J Vosshenrich; Marjolein J W de Bruijn; Diogo Fonseca Pereira; Henrique Veiga Fernandes; Rudi W Hendriks; James P Di Santo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tom Cupedo; Natasha K Crellin; Natalie Papazian; Elwin J Rombouts; Kees Weijer; Jane L Grogan; Willem E Fibbe; Jan J Cornelissen; Hergen Spits Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2008-11-23 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Babak Baban; Molly Braun; Hesam Khodadadi; Ayobami Ward; Katelyn Alverson; Aneeq Malik; Khoi Nguyen; Skon Nazarian; David C Hess; Scott Forseen; Alexander F Post; Fernando L Vale; John R Vender; Md Nasrul Hoda; Omid Akbari; Kumar Vaibhav; Krishnan M Dhandapani Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2021-01-11
Authors: David A Rafei-Shamsabadi; Christoph S N Klose; Timotheus Y F Halim; Yakup Tanriver; Thilo Jakob Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 7.561