Literature DB >> 26948785

Effect of a multimedia-assisted informed consent procedure on the information gain, satisfaction, and anxiety of cataract surgery patients.

Saskia M Tipotsch-Maca1, Ralph M Varsits2, Christian Ginzel2, Pia V Vecsei-Marlovits2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether a multimedia-assisted preoperative informed consent procedure has an effect on patients' knowledge concerning cataract surgery, satisfaction with the informed consent process, and reduction in anxiety levels.
SETTING: Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
METHODS: Patients participated in an informed consent procedure for age-related cataract surgery that included the standard approach only (reading the information brochure and having a standardized face-to-face discussion) or supplemented with a computer-animated video. The main outcome was information retention assessed by a questionnaire. Further outcome measures used were the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Visual Function-14 score, and an assessment of satisfaction.
RESULTS: The study included 123 patients (64 in standard-only group; 59 in computer-animated video group). Both groups scored well on the questionnaire; however, patients who watched the video performed better (82% retention versus 72%) (P = .002). Scores tended to decrease with increasing age (r = -0.25, P = .005); however, this decrease was smaller in the group that watched the video. Both groups had elevated anxiety levels (means in video group: anxiety concerning the current situation [S-anxiety] = 63.8 ± 9.6 [SD], general tendency toward anxiety [T-anxiety] = 65.5 ± 7.9; means in control group: S-anxiety = 61.9 ± 10.3, T-anxiety = 66.2 ± 7.8).
CONCLUSIONS: A high level of information retention was achieved using an informed consent procedure consisting of an information brochure and a standardized face-to-face discussion. A further increase in information retention was achieved, even with increasing patient age, by adding a multimedia presentation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948785     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  13 in total

1.  Do patients only remember who performed their cataract surgery if complications occur?

Authors:  Safa Elhassan; Gwyn Samuel Williams
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  A randomized, controlled trial of video supplementation on the cataract surgery informed consent process.

Authors:  Michael H Zhang; Zeeshan U Haq; Evan M Braithwaite; Noah C Simon; Kamran M Riaz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Use of multimedia during informed consent: novelty or necessity.

Authors:  Henry H Chill; Uri Dior; David Shveiky
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The Effect of Pre-Surgery Information Online Lecture on Nutrition Knowledge and Anxiety Among Bariatric Surgery Candidates.

Authors:  Shiri Sherf-Dagan; Keren Hod; Limor Mardy-Tilbor; Shir Gliksman; Tair Ben-Porat; Nasser Sakran; Shira Zelber-Sagi; David Goitein; Asnat Raziel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Johanna Glaser; Sarah Nouri; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca L Sudore; Dean Schillinger; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Yael Schenker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Enhancing the Informed Consent Process Using Shared Decision Making and Consent Refusal Data from the CLEAR III Trial.

Authors:  Amanda L Porter; James Ebot; Karen Lane; Lesia H Mooney; Amy M Lannen; Eugene M Richie; Rachel Dlugash; Steve Mayo; Thomas G Brott; Wendy Ziai; William D Freeman; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Oxford Video Informed Consent Tool (OxVIC): a pilot study of informed video consent in spinal surgery and preoperative patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Gerard Mawhinney; Chrishan Thakar; Victoria Williamson; Dominique A Rothenfluh; Jeremy Reynolds
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Fear and Anxiety Associated with Cataract Surgery Under Local Anesthesia in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Iwona Obuchowska; Joanna Konopinska
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2021-06-18

9.  Impact of Preoperative Video Education for Cataract Surgery on Patient Learning Outcomes.

Authors:  C Ellis Wisely; Cason B Robbins; Sandra Stinnett; Terry Kim; Robin R Vann; Preeya K Gupta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-20

10.  Effect of a Multimedia Patient Decision Aid to Supplement the Informed Consent Process of a Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter Procedure: Pre-Post Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Azizeh K Sowan; Arlienita R Beraya; Adrian Carrola; Charles Reed
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.