Literature DB >> 26948778

Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.

H John Shammas1, Sergio Ortiz2, Maya C Shammas2, Seong Hwan Kim2, Changho Chong2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the measurements obtained with the Argos, a new biometer with swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), and to compare them with the results obtained with the IOLMaster 500 (partial-coherence interferometry [PCI]) and the Lenstar LS 900 (optical low-coherence reflectometry [OLCR]) biometers.
SETTING: Private practice, Lynwood, California, USA.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
METHODS: All measurements were performed with the SS-OCT tomographer, the PCI biometer, and the OLCR biometer.
RESULTS: Eyes (n = 107) were measured to evaluate the axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness, pupil size, corneal diameter, and anterior corneal radius of curvature (RAV). Repeatability and reproducibility of the SS-OCT measurements showed comparable values and a low variation rate, with an interset mean difference of 0.01 mm for AL, 0.01 mm for CCT, 0.01 mm for aqueous depth and ACD, 0.03 mm for lens thickness, 0.10 mm for pupil size, 0.14 mm for corneal diameter, and 0.02 mm for RAV. The SS-OCT device correctly measured the AL in 96% of the cases compared with 79% for the OLCR device and 77% for the PCI device. Comparisons between the PCI device and SS-OCT device were -0.01 ± 0.05 mm for AL, -0.17 ± 0.20 mm for ACD, and -0.01 ± 0.05 mm for RAV. Comparison between the OLCR device and the SS-OCT device was 0.01 ± 0.06 mm for AL, 0.08 ± 0.15 mm for ACD, 0.00 ± 0.05 mm for RAV, 0.00 ± 0.01 mm for CCT, 0.07 ± 0.14 mm for aqueous depth, -0.23 ± 0.22 mm for lens thickness, -0.29 ± 0.53 mm for pupil size, and -0.34 ± 0.76 mm for corneal diameter.
CONCLUSION: Axial length measurements with the new SS-OCT biometer were comparable to the PCI and OLCR measurements with a higher AL acquisition rate. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Shammas is a consultant to Movu, Inc. Drs. Ortiz, Kim, and Chong have proprietary interest in the new technology.
Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948778     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  27 in total

1.  A Randomized Trial of Soft Multifocal Contact Lenses for Myopia Control: Baseline Data and Methods.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Amber Gaume Giannoni; Loraine T Sinnott; Moriah A Chandler; Juan Huang; Donald O Mutti; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Comparison of Scheimpflug and swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconus eyes.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Ghoreishi; Seyed Ali Akbar Mortazavi; Zahra-Alsadat Abtahi; Mohammad-Ali Abtahi; Seyed Ali Sonbolestan; Seyed-Hossein Abtahi; Mohadeseh Mohammadinia; Kimia Nekouie Isfahani
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Full ocular biometry through dual-depth whole-eye optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Hyung-Jin Kim; Minji Kim; Min Gyu Hyeon; Youngwoon Choi; Beop-Min Kim
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Effects on IOL Power Calculation and Expected Clinical Outcomes of Axial Length Measurements Based on Multiple vs Single Refractive Indices.

Authors:  H John Shammas; Maya C Shammas; Renu V Jivrajka; David L Cooke; Richard Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-04

5.  Changes in the anterior segment after cycloplegia with a biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tomoaki Higashiyama; Maki Iwasa; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry.

Authors:  Tomoaki Higashiyama; Hazuki Mori; Fumi Nakajima; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Enhanced Penetration for Axial Length Measurement of Eyes with Dense Cataracts Using Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography: A Consecutive Observational Study.

Authors:  Nino Hirnschall; Ralph Varsits; Birgit Doeller; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-03-01

8.  Predictive accuracy of partial coherence interferometry and swept-source optical coherence tomography for intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Woong-Joo Whang; Young-Sik Yoo; Min-Ji Kang; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparison of agreement and efficiency of a swept source-optical coherence tomography device and an optical low-coherence reflectometry device for biometry measurements during cataract evaluation.

Authors:  Samuel F Passi; Atalie C Thompson; Preeya K Gupta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-01

10.  Refractive surprise after cataract surgery secondary to smeared optics of swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: a case report.

Authors:  Francis Carr; Vinod Gangwani
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.