Literature DB >> 26948127

The natural process of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and effect of lacrimal sac massage.

Omer Karti1, Eyyup Karahan2, Durgul Acan3, Tuncay Kusbeci3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the rate of symptomatic improvement of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in infants treated with conservative management within the first year of age. Other purpose of the study is to emphasize the relationship between spontaneous resolution time and effective lacrimal sac massage. Thirty-one infants were diagnosed to have CNLDO by an ophthalmologist prior to 3 months of age. In this study, 36 eyes of 31 patients were included with CNLDO. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (28 eyes of 24 patients) was consisted of the patients who were applied effective lacrimal sac massage regularly during the follow-up period, and patients whose parents did not apply a regular lacrimal passage regularly were accepted as group 2 (8 eyes of 7 patients). Thirty-three eyes of 31 patients (18 rights and 15 left) successfully resolved with only conservative management (91.6 %). In these thirty-three eyes, one eye (3 %) resolved between 0 and 3 months, fourteen eyes (42.5 %) resolved between 4 and 6 months, eleven eyes (33.3 %) resolved between 7 and 9 months, and seven eyes (21.2 %) resolved between 10 and 12 months. CNLDO was resolved in 27 (96.2 %) of 28 eyes in group 1, and in group 2, six eyes (77.7 %) had resolvement. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). The mean age of resolution was 6.8 ± 1.88 months in group 1, 10.3 ± 1.5 months in group 2 (p < 0.001). In light of our study, we believe that conservative management of CNLDO is highly successful. Our study provided a possible objective explanation for the efficacy of lacrimal sac massage. Emphasizing the importance of the massage to parents and describing in detail can reduce the risk of unnecessary surgical interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; Epiphora; Lacrimal sac massage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26948127     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0208-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  23 in total

1.  Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: irrigation or probing?

Authors:  Y S Kim; S C Moon; K W Yoo
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12

2.  [Identification of bacterial flora of conjunctival sac in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children].

Authors:  Marek Gerkowicz; Maria Kozioł-Montewka; Małgorzata Pietraś-Trzpiel; Ewa Kosior-Jarecka; Agnieszka Szczepanik; Małgorzata Latalska
Journal:  Klin Oczna       Date:  2005

3.  Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in association with chronic dacryocystitis secondary to congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Sylvia Kodsi
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 4.  Managing congenital lacrimal obstruction in general practice.

Authors:  J D Young; C J MacEwen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-02

5.  Bacteriology and antibiotic therapy in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  A Kuchar; J Lukas; F J Steinkogler
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2000-12

6.  Lacrimal surgery in children.

Authors:  R A Welham; S M Hughes
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-01-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Bacterial growth in the conjunctival sac and the local defense of the outer eye.

Authors:  O L Jensen; B S Gluud
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Suppl       Date:  1985

8.  Spectrum and the susceptibilities of microbial isolates in cases of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Kim Usha; Sankaranarayanan Smitha; Nagendra Shah; Prajna Lalitha; Rahul Kelkar
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 9.  Infections due to penicillin-resistant pneumococci. Clinical, epidemiologic, and microbiologic features.

Authors:  G M Caputo; P C Appelbaum; H H Liu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-06-14

10.  Conservative management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  P Nucci; C Capoferri; R Alfarano; R Brancato
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  5 in total

1.  Age-Specific Outcomes of Conservative Approach and Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.

Authors:  Apatsa Lekskul; Puncharut Preechaharn; Passara Jongkhajornpong; Wadakarn Wuthisiri
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  Spontaneous resolution rates in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction managed with massage or topical antibiotics compared with observation alone.

Authors:  Brian G Mohney; Saraniya Sathiamoorthi; Ryan D Frank
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.908

Review 3.  Insights in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Elena Avram
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction (CNLDO): A Review.

Authors:  Aldo Vagge; Lorenzo Ferro Desideri; Paolo Nucci; Massimiliano Serafino; Giuseppe Giannaccare; Andrea Lembo; Carlo Enrico Traverso
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2018-10-22

Review 5.  The Use of Stents in Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Requiring Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evelyn Li Min Tai; Yee Cheng Kueh; Baharudin Abdullah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.