Literature DB >> 26947429

Thermal taster status: Evidence of cross-modal integration.

Joanne Hort1, Rebecca A Ford1, Sally Eldeghaidy2,3, Susan T Francis2.   

Abstract

Thermal taster status refers to the finding that, in some individuals, thermal stimulation of the tongue elicits a phantom taste. Little is known regarding the mechanism for this, it is hypothesised to be a result of cross-wiring between gustatory and trigeminal nerves whose receptors co-innervate papillae on the tongue. To address this, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging to perform the first study of whether the cortical response to gustatory-trigeminal samples is altered with thermal taster status. We study the response to cold (6°C) gustatory (sweet) samples at varying levels of trigeminal stimulation elicited by CO2 (no CO2 , low CO2 , high CO2 ) in thermal taster (TT) and thermal non-taster (TnT) groups, and evaluate associated behavioural measures. Behaviourally, the TT group perceived gustatory and trigeminal stimuli significantly more intense than TnTs, and were significantly more discriminating of CO2 level. fMRI data revealed elevated cortical activation to the no CO2 sample for the TT group compared to TnT group in taste, oral somatosensory and reward areas. In TnTs, a significant positive modulation in cortical response with increasing level of CO2 was found across taste, somatosensory and reward areas. In contrast, in TTs, a reduced positive modulation with increasing level of CO2 was found in somatosensory areas (SI, SII), whilst a significant negative modulation was found in taste (anterior insula) and reward (ACC) areas. This difference in cortical response to trigeminal stimuli supports cross-modal integration in TTs, with gustatory and trigeminal nerves highly stimulated by cold gustatory samples due to their intertwined nature. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2263-2275, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BOLD; fMRI; insula; oral somatosensory; taste; thermal taster status; trigeminal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26947429      PMCID: PMC6867538          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  37 in total

1.  Enhancement of BOLD-contrast sensitivity by single-shot multi-echo functional MR imaging.

Authors:  S Posse; S Wiese; D Gembris; K Mathiak; C Kessler; M L Grosse-Ruyken; B Elghahwagi; T Richards; S R Dager; V G Kiselev
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Representation of pleasant and aversive taste in the human brain.

Authors:  J O'Doherty; E T Rolls; S Francis; R Bowtell; F McGlone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its relationship with taste and olfactory areas.

Authors:  S Francis; E T Rolls; R Bowtell; F McGlone; J O'Doherty; A Browning; S Clare; E Smith
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Taste-related activity in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Morten L Kringelbach; Ivan E T de Araujo; Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Evidence for an integrated oral sensory module in the human anterior ventral insula.

Authors:  K Rudenga; B Green; D Nachtigal; D M Small
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Flavor processing: more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  D M Small; M Jones-Gotman; R J Zatorre; M Petrides; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-22       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Effect of sucrose on the perceived flavor intensity of chewing gum.

Authors:  J M Davidson; R S Linforth; T A Hollowood; A J Taylor
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 8.  Two decades of supertasting: where do we stand?

Authors:  John E Hayes; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-08-07

9.  Chemesthesis and taste: evidence of independent processing of sensation intensity.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Marty Alvarez-Reeves; Pravin George; Carol Akirav
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-09-30

10.  Identification of human gustatory cortex by activation likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Maria G Veldhuizen; Jessica Albrecht; Christina Zelano; Sanne Boesveldt; Paul Breslin; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sweet Thermal Taste: Perceptual Characteristics in Water and Dependence on TAS1R2/TAS1R3.

Authors:  Danielle Nachtigal; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  An automated method to detect and quantify fungiform papillae in the human tongue: Validation and relationship to phenotypical differences in taste perception.

Authors:  Sally Eldeghaidy; Daniel Thomas; Martha Skinner; Rebecca Ford; Timo Giesbrecht; Anna Thomas; Joanne Hort; Susan Francis
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-12-06

3.  Variation in thermally induced taste response across thermal tasters.

Authors:  Martha Skinner; Sally Eldeghaidy; Rebecca Ford; Timo Giesbrecht; Anna Thomas; Susan Francis; Joanne Hort
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-02-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.