Literature DB >> 26947350

Histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma significantly affects survival in the era of partial nephrectomy.

Daniel P Nguyen1, Emily A Vertosick2, Renato B Corradi3, Antoni Vilaseca3, Nicole E Benfante3, Karim A Touijer4, Daniel D Sjoberg2, Paul Russo4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether the histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) affects survival after surgical resection in contemporary patients, and if so, whether prognostic significance differs according to the type of surgical resection or tumor stage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2006 to 2014, 2,237 patients underwent surgical resection (25% radical nephrectomy and 75% partial nephrectomy [PN]) for nonmetastatic RCC at a tertiary referral center. Estimated survival function curves and Cox regression models evaluated the effect of histological subtype on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Interaction analyses tested whether the effect of histological subtype depends on the type of surgical resection or tumor stage.
RESULTS: Patients with RCC stage T2 or lower and those with low-grade conventional clear cell, papillary or chromophobe RCC of any stage had 5-year RFS probabilities>90%. Patients with clear cell papillary RCC stage T3 or greater had predicted 5-year RFS of 81%. However, 5-year OS probabilities were>94% for clear cell papillary RCC of any stage. High-grade conventional clear cell and papillary RCC stage T2 or lower, low-grade conventional clear cell and chromophobe RCC of any stage conferred 5-year OS probabilities of >93%. Unclassified RCC demonstrated the lowest OS probabilities at any stage. In multivariable analyses, histological subtype affected RFS (P<0.0001) and OS (P = 0.026) following surgical resection, with no differences in this association for radical nephrectomy vs. PN (RFS, P = 0.2; OS, P = 0.4), and across pathologic stages (RFS, P = 0.1; OS, P = 0.3). Compared with low-grade conventional clear cell RCC, chromophobe (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.30-1.75) and papillary RCC (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09-0.97) conferred lower risk of recurrence. Chromophobe (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.30-1.52) and clear cell papillary RCC (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.12-6.78) conferred the lowest risk of all-cause mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: In the era of PN for RCC, histological subtype remained a significant predictor of survival, regardless of type of surgical resection or tumor stage.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histological subtype; Recurrence; Renal cell carcinoma; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26947350      PMCID: PMC5133368          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  26 in total

1.  The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver Classification of Renal Neoplasia.

Authors:  John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; John N Eble; Lars Egevad; Jonathan I Epstein; David Grignon; Ondrej Hes; Holger Moch; Rodolfo Montironi; Satish K Tickoo; Ming Zhou; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Histological subtype is an independent predictor of outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Bradley C Leibovich; Christine M Lohse; Paul L Crispen; Stephen A Boorjian; R Houston Thompson; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Spectrum of epithelial neoplasms in end-stage renal disease: an experience from 66 tumor-bearing kidneys with emphasis on histologic patterns distinct from those in sporadic adult renal neoplasia.

Authors:  Satish K Tickoo; Mariza N dePeralta-Venturina; Lara R Harik; Heath D Worcester; Mohamed E Salama; Andrew N Young; Holger Moch; Mahul B Amin
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor: two variants of a morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic distinct entity of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Deml; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Eva Compérat; Adriana von Teichman; Martina Storz; Peter Schraml; Joseph V Bonventre; Falko Fend; Barbara Fleige; Andreas Nerlich; Helmut E Gabbert; Nikolaus GaBler; Rainer Grobholz; Seife Hailemariam; Raoul Hinze; Ruth Knüchel; Benoit Lhermitte; Gabriella Nesi; Thomas Rüdiger; Guido Sauter; Holger Moch
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 5.  Prognostic factors and predictive models in renal cell carcinoma: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Maxine Sun; Shahrokh F Shariat; Christopher Cheng; Vincenzo Ficarra; Masaru Murai; Stéphane Oudard; Allan J Pantuck; Richard Zigeuner; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Clinical and pathological features associated with prognosis in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  William R Sukov; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; R Houston Thompson; John C Cheville
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours.

Authors:  G Kovacs; M Akhtar; B J Beckwith; P Bugert; C S Cooper; B Delahunt; J N Eble; S Fleming; B Ljungberg; L J Medeiros; H Moch; V E Reuter; E Ritz; G Roos; D Schmidt; J R Srigley; S Störkel; E van den Berg; B Zbar
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Does histologic subtype affect oncologic outcomes after nephron-sparing surgery?

Authors:  Maxime Crépel; Hendrik Isbarn; Umberto Capitanio; Daniel Liberman; Claudio Jeldres; Maxine Sun; Shahrokh F Shariat; Hugues Widmer; Philippe Arjane; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Jean-Jacques Patard; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Prognostic impact of histological subtype on surgically treated localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Patrick E Teloken; R Houston Thompson; Satish K Tickoo; Angel Cronin; Caroline Savage; Victor E Reuter; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  The expanding role of partial nephrectomy: a critical analysis of indications, results, and complications.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; Didier Jacqmin; Louis R Kavoussi; Francesco Montorsi; Jean Jacques Patard; Craig G Rogers; Paul Russo; Robert G Uzzo; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  17 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline for followup of patients after treatment of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Leonardo L Monteiro; Darrel E Drachenberg; Adrian S Fairey; Antonio Finelli; Anil Kapoor; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Michael J Leveridge; Nicholas E Power; Frederic Pouliot; Ricardo A Rendon; Robert Sabbagh; Alan I So; Simon Tanguay; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Correlating Preoperative Imaging with Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Common Mimickers.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordetsky; Jessica Zarzour
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Histologic subtype needs to be considered after partial nephrectomy in patients with pathologic T1a renal cell carcinoma: papillary vs. clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sangjun Yoo; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Cheryn Song; Bumsik Hong; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Risk Based Surveillance after Surgical Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Paolo Capogrosso; Alessandro Larcher; Daniel D Sjoberg; Emily A Vertosick; Francesco Cianflone; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Cristina Carenzi; Andrea Salonia; Andrew J Vickers; Francesco Montorsi; Roberto Bertini; Umberto Capitanio
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Prognostic Value of Histologic Subtype and Treatment Modality for T1a Kidney Cancers.

Authors:  Michael Siev; Audrey Renson; Hung-Jui Tan; Tracy L Rose; Stella K Kang; William C Huang; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Kidney Cancer       Date:  2020-03-30

Review 6.  Unclassified renal cell carcinoma: diagnostic difficulties and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Deepika Sirohi; Steven C Smith; Neeraj Agarwal; Benjamin L Maughan
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2018-11-15

7.  Surgical treatment for renal masses in the elderly: analysis of oncological, surgical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Slawomir Poletajew; Piotr Zapała; Bartlomiej Kopczyński; Lukasz Białek; Sylwia Bender; Tomasz Mutrynowski; Mateusz Nowak; Julia Mróz; Grzegorz Pędzisz; Bartosz Dybowski; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Renal Surgery for Hilar Tumors: Informing the Decisions in Risk-Adapted Management.

Authors:  Ricardo G Alvim; Amy L Tin; Lucas Nogueira; Nathan C Wong; Renato C Fonseca; Daniel D Sjoberg; A Ari Hakimi; Karim A Touijer; Paul Russo; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  A miRNA-based classification of renal cell carcinoma subtypes by PCR and in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Ashley Di Meo; Rola Saleeb; Samantha J Wala; Heba W Khella; Qiang Ding; Haiyan Zhai; Kalra Krishan; Adriana Krizova; Manal Gabril; Andrew Evans; Fadi Brimo; Maria D Pasic; Antonio Finelli; Eleftherios P Diamandis; George M Yousef
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-08

10.  Frequency, incidence and survival outcomes of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in the United States from 1973 to 2014: A SEER-based analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Feng; Lina Zhang; Wenzhi Tu; Shundong Cang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.