Literature DB >> 26947033

An investigation of jogging biomechanics using the full-body lumbar spine model: Model development and validation.

Margaret E Raabe1, Ajit M W Chaudhari2.   

Abstract

The ability of a biomechanical simulation to produce results that can translate to real-life situations is largely dependent on the physiological accuracy of the musculoskeletal model. There are a limited number of freely-available, full-body models that exist in OpenSim, and those that do exist are very limited in terms of trunk musculature and degrees of freedom in the spine. Properly modeling the motion and musculature of the trunk is necessary to most accurately estimate lower extremity and spinal loading. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a more physiologically accurate OpenSim full-body model. By building upon three previously developed OpenSim models, the full-body lumbar spine (FBLS) model, comprised of 21 segments, 30 degrees-of-freedom, and 324 musculotendon actuators, was developed. The five lumbar vertebrae were modeled as individual bodies, and coupled constraints were implemented to describe the net motion of the spine. The eight major muscle groups of the lumbar spine were modeled (rectus abdominis, external and internal obliques, erector spinae, multifidus, quadratus lumborum, psoas major, and latissimus dorsi), and many of these muscle groups were modeled as multiple fascicles allowing the large muscles to act in multiple directions. The resulting FBLS model׳s trunk muscle geometry, maximal isometric joint moments, and simulated muscle activations compare well to experimental data. The FBLS model will be made freely available (https://simtk.org/home/fullbodylumbar) for others to perform additional analyses and develop simulations investigating full-body dynamics and contributions of the trunk muscles to dynamic tasks.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core; Full-body; Lumbar spine; Modeling; Musculoskeletal model; OpenSim; Simulation; Trunk

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26947033      PMCID: PMC4851590          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  27 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of the effects of a trunk stabilization program on trunk control and knee loading.

Authors:  Steve T Jamison; Ryan J McNeilan; Gregory S Young; Deborah L Givens; Thomas M Best; Ajit M W Chaudhari
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control.

Authors:  Katherine R S Holzbaur; Wendy M Murray; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  A generic detailed rigid-body lumbar spine model.

Authors:  Mark de Zee; Lone Hansen; Christian Wong; John Rasmussen; Erik B Simonsen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The effects of core muscle activation on dynamic trunk position and knee abduction moments: implications for ACL injury.

Authors:  Steve T Jamison; Michael P McNally; Laura C Schmitt; Ajit M W Chaudhari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Development and Validation of a Musculoskeletal Model of the Fully Articulated Thoracolumbar Spine and Rib Cage.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  How muscle fiber lengths and velocities affect muscle force generation as humans walk and run at different speeds.

Authors:  Edith M Arnold; Samuel R Hamner; Ajay Seth; Matthew Millard; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  S McGill; D Juker; P Kropf
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Muscle contributions to propulsion and support during running.

Authors:  Samuel R Hamner; Ajay Seth; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Human trunk strength profile in lateral flexion and axial rotation.

Authors:  S Kumar; R M Dufresne; T Van Schoor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The effect of thoracic kyphosis and sagittal plane alignment on vertebral compressive loading.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Dennis E Anderson; John D'Agostino; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  1 in total

1.  Musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.

Authors:  Stefan Schmid; Katelyn A Burkhart; Brett T Allaire; Daniel Grindle; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.712

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.