Robert W S Coulter1, Michelle Birkett2, Heather L Corliss3, Mark L Hatzenbuehler4, Brian Mustanski2, Ron D Stall5. 1. Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States; Center for LGBT Health Research, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States. Electronic address: Robert.ws.coulter@pitt.edu. 2. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States. 3. Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, United States. 4. Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States. 5. Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States; Center for LGBT Health Research, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether adolescents drank alcohol less frequently if they lived in jurisdictions with school climates that were more affirmative of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) individuals. METHODS: Data from the 2010 School Health Profile survey, which measured LGBTQ school climate (e.g., percentage of schools with safe spaces and gay-straight alliances), were linked with pooled data from the 2005 and 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which measured sexual orientation identity, demographics, and alcohol use (number of drinking days, drinking days at school, and heavy episodic drinking days) in 8 jurisdictions. Two-level Poisson models tested the associations between school climate and alcohol use for each sexual-orientation subgroup. RESULTS: Living in jurisdictions with more (versus less) affirmative LGBTQ school climates was significantly associated with: fewer heavy episodic drinking days for gay/lesbian (incidence-rate ratio [IRR]=0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56, 0.87; p=0.001) and heterosexual (IRR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.83; p<0.001) adolescents; and fewer drinking days at school for adolescents unsure of their sexual orientation (IRR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.93; p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Fostering LGBTQ-affirmative school climates may reduce certain drinking behaviors for gay/lesbian adolescents, heterosexual adolescents, and adolescents unsure of their sexual orientation.
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether adolescents drank alcohol less frequently if they lived in jurisdictions with school climates that were more affirmative of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) individuals. METHODS: Data from the 2010 School Health Profile survey, which measured LGBTQ school climate (e.g., percentage of schools with safe spaces and gay-straight alliances), were linked with pooled data from the 2005 and 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which measured sexual orientation identity, demographics, and alcohol use (number of drinking days, drinking days at school, and heavy episodic drinking days) in 8 jurisdictions. Two-level Poisson models tested the associations between school climate and alcohol use for each sexual-orientation subgroup. RESULTS: Living in jurisdictions with more (versus less) affirmative LGBTQ school climates was significantly associated with: fewer heavy episodic drinking days for gay/lesbian (incidence-rate ratio [IRR]=0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56, 0.87; p=0.001) and heterosexual (IRR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.83; p<0.001) adolescents; and fewer drinking days at school for adolescents unsure of their sexual orientation (IRR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.93; p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Fostering LGBTQ-affirmative school climates may reduce certain drinking behaviors for gay/lesbian adolescents, heterosexual adolescents, and adolescents unsure of their sexual orientation.
Authors: Hee-Jin Jun; S Bryn Austin; Sarah A Wylie; Heather L Corliss; Benita Jackson; Donna Spiegelman; Mathew J Pazaris; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-07-18 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Michael P Marshal; Mark S Friedman; Ron Stall; Kevin M King; Jonathan Miles; Melanie A Gold; Oscar G Bukstein; Jennifer Q Morse Journal: Addiction Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Brian Mustanski; Aimee Van Wagenen; Michelle Birkett; Sandra Eyster; Heather L Corliss Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Margaret Rosario; Heather L Corliss; Bethany G Everett; Stephen T Russell; Francisco O Buchting; Michelle A Birkett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Amelia E Talley; Tonda L Hughes; Frances Aranda; Michelle Birkett; Michael P Marshal Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Robert W S Coulter; James E Egan; Suzanne Kinsky; M Reuel Friedman; Kristen L Eckstrand; Jessica Frankeberger; Barbara L Folb; Christina Mair; Nina Markovic; Anthony Silvestre; Ron Stall; Elizabeth Miller Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Marla E Eisenberg; Darin J Erickson; Amy L Gower; Len Kne; Ryan J Watson; Heather L Corliss; Elizabeth M Saewyc Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2019-08-24
Authors: Marla E Eisenberg; Christopher J Mehus; Elizabeth M Saewyc; Heather L Corliss; Amy L Gower; Richard Sullivan; Carolyn M Porta Journal: J Homosex Date: 2017-09-15
Authors: Zewditu Demissie; Catherine N Rasberry; Riley J Steiner; Nancy Brener; Tim McManus Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Paul A Gilbert; Lauren E Pass; Alex S Keuroghlian; Tom K Greenfield; Sari L Reisner Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-03-10 Impact factor: 4.492