Literature DB >> 26946296

The Attention-Lapse and Motor Decoupling accounts of SART performance are not mutually exclusive.

Paul Seli1.   

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate about the mechanisms purported to underlie performance in the Sustained-Attention-to-Response Task (SART). Whereas the Attention-Lapse account posits that SART errors result from attentional disengagement, the Motor Decoupling account proposes that SART errors result from failures to inhibit a fast, prepotent motor response, despite adequate attention to the task. That SART performance might be fully accounted for by motor decoupling is problematic for a Attention-Lapse account, and for the use of the SART as an index of attention lapses. To test whether SART performance is in fact fully accounted for by motor decoupling, I examined the relation between SART performance and attention lapses while controlling for motor decoupling. The results were clear: The SART was associated with attention lapses independently of motor decoupling. Thus, the present study suggests that both accounts are correct and that the SART is a valid measure of attention lapses.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attention lapses; Inattention; Mind wandering; Motor decoupling; SART; The Sustained Attention to Response Task

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26946296     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  16 in total

1.  Dynamic brain network configurations during rest and an attention task with frequent occurrence of mind wandering.

Authors:  Ekaterina Denkova; Jason S Nomi; Lucina Q Uddin; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.

Authors:  Jasmine S Dang; Ivonne J Figueroa; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Mind-wandering in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Mate Gyurkovics; David A Balota; Jonathan D Jackson
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Worry alters speed-accuracy tradeoffs but does not impair sustained attention.

Authors:  Lauren S Hallion; Susan N Kusmierski; M Kathleen Caulfield
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2020-02-29

5.  Intentionality and meta-awareness of mind wandering: Are they one and the same, or distinct dimensions?

Authors:  Paul Seli; Brandon C W Ralph; Evan F Risko; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel L Schacter; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

6.  Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; David Maillet; Daniel Smilek; Jonathan M Oakman; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-05-04

7.  The awakening of the attention: Evidence for a link between the monitoring of mind wandering and prospective goals.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Daniel Smilek; Brandon C W Ralph; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-01-22

8.  Mind-wandering Is Accompanied by Both Local Sleep and Enhanced Processes of Spatial Attention Allocation.

Authors:  Christian Wienke; Mandy V Bartsch; Lena Vogelgesang; Christoph Reichert; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Stefan Dürschmid
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-01-15

Review 9.  Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Evan F Risko; Daniel Smilek; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Clinical anxiety promotes excessive response inhibition.

Authors:  C Grillon; O J Robinson; K O'Connell; A Davis; G Alvarez; D S Pine; M Ernst
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.