Literature DB >> 26945155

A Novel Prediction Model of Prognosis After Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: Development and Validation Using Asian Databases.

Yanghee Woo1, Taeil Son, Kijun Song, Naoki Okumura, Yanfeng Hu, Gyu-Seok Cho, Jong Won Kim, Seung-Ho Choi, Sung Hoon Noh, Woo Jin Hyung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prognoses of gastric cancer patients vary greatly among countries. Meanwhile, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system shows limited accuracy in predicting patient-specific survival for gastric cancer. The objective of this study was to create a simple, yet universally applicable survival prediction model for surgically treated gastric cancer patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A prediction model of 5-year overall survival for surgically treated gastric cancer patients regardless of curability was developed using a test data set of 11,851 consecutive patients.
METHODS: The model's coefficients were selected based on univariate and multivariate analysis of patient, tumor, and surgical factors shown to significantly impact survival using a Cox proportional hazards model. For internal validation, discrimination was calculated with the concordance index (C-statistic) using the bootstrap method and calibration assessed. The model was externally validated using 4 data sets from 3 countries.
RESULTS: Our model's C-statistic (0.824) showed better discrimination power than current tumor-node-metastasis staging (0.788) (P < 0.0001). Bootstrap internal validation demonstrated that coefficients remained largely unchanged between iterations, with an average C-statistic of 0.822. The model calibration was accurate in predicting 5-year survival. In the external validation, C-statistics showed good discrimination (range: 0.798-0.868) in patient data sets from 4 participating institutions in 3 different countries.
CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing clinically practical patient, tumor, and surgical information, we developed a universally applicable prediction model for accurately determining the 5-year overall survival of gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy. Our predictive model was also valid in patients who underwent noncurative resection or inadequate lymphadenectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26945155     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

1.  Prognostic Value and Association of Sarcopenia and Systemic Inflammation for Patients with Gastric Cancer Following Radical Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Jun-Peng Lin; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ruhong Tu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-25

2.  Clinicopathological Features and Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer with a Family History: a Large Analysis of 2,736 Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Oh Jeong; Mi Ran Jung; Young Kyu Park; Seong Yeob Ryu
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 3.  Prediction models for patients with esophageal or gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H G van den Boorn; E G Engelhardt; J van Kleef; M A G Sprangers; M G H van Oijen; A Abu-Hanna; A H Zwinderman; V M H Coupé; H W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Prognostic Value of Restaging F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Predict 3-Year Post-Recurrence Survival in Patients with Recurrent Gastric Cancer after Curative Resection.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Kim; Bong Il Song; Hae Won Kim; Kyoung Sook Won; Young Gil Son; Seung Wan Ryu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Prognostic Models for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Primary Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Qi Feng; Margaret T May; Suzanne Ingle; Ming Lu; Zuyao Yang; Jinling Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Deep Learning-Based Survival Analysis Identified Associations Between Molecular Subtype and Optimal Adjuvant Treatment of Patients With Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jeeyun Lee; Ji Yeong An; Min Gew Choi; Se Hoon Park; Seung Tae Kim; Jun Ho Lee; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Sung Kim; Hyuk Lee; Byung-Hoon Min; Jae J Kim; Woo Kyoung Jeong; Dong-Il Choi; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Won Ki Kang; Mijung Kim; Sung Wook Seo
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

7.  Development and validation of an artificial neural network prognostic model after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: An international multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Ziyu Li; Xiaolong Wu; Xiangyu Gao; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Yan Zhang; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  A Novel Risk prediction Model for Patients with Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Meng-Xin Tian; Wen-Jun He; Wei-Ren Liu; Jia-Cheng Yin; Lei Jin; Zheng Tang; Xi-Fei Jiang; Han Wang; Pei-Yun Zhou; Chen-Yang Tao; Zhen-Bin Ding; Yuan-Fei Peng; Zhi Dai; Shuang-Jian Qiu; Jian Zhou; Jia Fan; Ying-Hong Shi
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Prognostic value and nomograms of proximal margin distance in gastric cancer with radical distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jun Luo; Yuming Jiang; Xinhua Chen; Yuehong Chen; Jhang Lopsang Gurung; Tingyu Mou; Liying Zhao; Guoqing Lyu; Tuanjie Li; Guoxin Li; Jiang Yu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  New metastatic lymph node classification for early gastric cancer should differ from those for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: Results based on the SEER database.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Jun-Peng Lin; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.