Literature DB >> 26944785

Reproductive patterns, genetic diversity and inbreeding depression in two closely related Jumellea species with contrasting patterns of commonness and distribution.

Laury Blambert1, Bertrand Mallet2, Laurence Humeau2, Thierry Pailler2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Theory predicts that the long-term persistence of plant populations exposed to size reduction can be threatened by a loss of genetic diversity and increased inbreeding. However, several life-history and ecological traits can influence the response to population size reduction. The reproductive patterns, levels of genetic diversity and magnitude of inbreeding depression of the rare and fragmented Jumellea fragrans and of its widespread congener J. rossii were studied. The aim was to evaluate the effects of over-collection and fragmentation on J. fragrans and to enhance our knowledge of the biology and ecology of the two species, used for their aromatic and medicinal properties on Réunion.
METHODS: Hand pollination experiments were conducted to determine the breeding system and to evaluate the potential for inbreeding depression in both species. Nuclear microsatellite markers were used to investigate selfing rates and levels of genetic diversity. KEY
RESULTS: Jumellea rossii revealed a mixed-mating system, and inbreeding depression at the germination stage (δ = 0·66). Levels of genetic diversity were relatively high [allelic richness (AR) = 8·575 and expected heterozygosity (He) = 0·673]. In J. fragrans, selfing rates suggest a mainly outcrossing mating system. Genetic diversity was lower than in J. rossii, but not yet critically low (AR = 4·983 and He = 0·492), probably because of the mainly outcrossing mating system and the relatively high density of individuals in the studied population. Jumellea fragrans did not show inbreeding depression, and it is hypothesized that the population had progressively purged its genetic load during successive fragmentation events.
CONCLUSIONS: Even if the persistence of the J. fragrans population is not threatened in the short term, its genetic diversity has probably been reduced by fragmentation and over-collection. In situ conservation actions for J. fragrans and ex situ cultivation of both species are recommended in order to meet the demand of local people.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Jumellea fragrans; Jumellea rossii; fragmentation; genetic diversity; inbreeding depression; mating system; over-collection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26944785      PMCID: PMC4934390          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  30 in total

1.  Hawkmoth pollination of aerangoid orchids in Kenya, with special reference to nectar sugar concentration gradients in the floral spurs.

Authors:  Dino J Martins; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating.

Authors:  Alice A Winn; Elizabeth Elle; Susan Kalisz; Pierre-Olivier Cheptou; Christopher G Eckert; Carol Goodwillie; Mark O Johnston; David A Moeller; Richard H Ree; Risa D Sargent; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  THE TOPOGRAPHICAL TETRAZOLIUM METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE GERMINATING CAPACITY OF SEEDS.

Authors:  G Lakon
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1949-07       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco.

Authors:  A El Mousadik; R J Petit
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data.

Authors:  Patrice David; Benoît Pujol; Frédérique Viard; Vincent Castella; Jérôme Goudet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Delayed response in a plant-pollinator system to experimental grassland fragmentation.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Rusterholz; Bruno Baur
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants.

Authors:  A Young; T Boyle; T Brown
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfing.

Authors:  T J de Jong; N M Waser; P G Klinkhamer
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  The cost of inbreeding in Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Lisa E Wallace
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.844

10.  GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  4 in total

1.  Orchid conservation: further links.

Authors:  Michael F Fay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Breeding system and pollination of two closely related bamboo species.

Authors:  Ling-Na Chen; Yong-Zhong Cui; Khoon-Meng Wong; De-Zhu Li; Han-Qi Yang
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.276

3.  Population genetics data help to guide the conservation of palm species with small population sizes and fragmented habitats in Madagascar.

Authors:  Lauren M Gardiner; Mijoro Rakotoarinivo; Landy R Rajaovelona; Colin Clubbe
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Four raised to one equals one: A genetic approach to the Pseudolaelia vellozicola complex does not follow a math rule.

Authors:  Alison Gonçalves Nazareno; Luiz Menini Neto; Renata Santiago de Oliveira Buzatti; Cássio van den Berg; Rafaela Campostrini Forzza
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.