Literature DB >> 26944421

Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone health (MAVIDOS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Cyrus Cooper1, Nicholas C Harvey2, Nicholas J Bishop3, Stephen Kennedy4, Aris T Papageorghiou4, Inez Schoenmakers5, Robert Fraser6, Saurabh V Gandhi6, Andrew Carr7, Stefania D'Angelo8, Sarah R Crozier8, Rebecca J Moon8, Nigel K Arden7, Elaine M Dennison8, Keith M Godfrey2, Hazel M Inskip8, Ann Prentice5, M Zulf Mughal9, Richard Eastell10, David M Reid11, M Kassim Javaid7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maternal vitamin D status has been associated with bone mass of offspring in many, but not all, observational studies. However, maternal vitamin D repletion during pregnancy has not yet been proven to improve offspring bone mass in a randomised controlled trial. We aimed to assess whether neonates born to mothers supplemented with vitamin D during pregnancy have greater whole-body bone mineral content (BMC) at birth than those of mothers who had not received supplementation.
METHODS: The Maternal Vitamin D Osteoporosis Study (MAVIDOS) was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial that recruited pregnant women from three study sites in the UK (Southampton, Oxford, and Sheffield). Eligible participants were older than 18 years, with a singleton pregnancy, gestation of less than 17 weeks, and a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentration of 25-100 nmol/L at 10-17 weeks' gestation. P'articipants were randomly assigned (1:1), in randomly permuted blocks of ten, to either cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day or matched placebo, taken orally, from 14 weeks' gestation (or as soon as possible before 17 weeks' gestation if recruited later) until delivery. Participants and the research team were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was neonatal whole-body BMC, assessed within 2 weeks of birth by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), analysed in all randomly assigned neonates who had a usable DXA scan. Safety outcomes were assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, ISRCTN 82927713, and the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT 2007-001716-23.
FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2008, and Feb 11, 2014, we randomly assigned 569 pregnant women to placebo and 565 to cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day. 370 (65%) neonates in the placebo group and 367 (65%) neonates in the cholecalciferol group had a usable DXA scan and were analysed for the primary endpoint. Neonatal whole-body BMC of infants born to mothers assigned to cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day did not significantly differ from that of infants born to mothers assigned to placebo (61·6 g [95% CI 60·3-62·8] vs 60·5 g [59·3-61·7], respectively; p=0·21). We noted no significant differences in safety outcomes, apart from a greater proportion of women in the placebo group with severe post-partum haemorrhage than those in the cholecalciferol group (96 [17%] of 569 mothers in the placebo group vs 65 [12%] of 565 mothers in the cholecalciferol group; p=0·01). No adverse events were deemed to be treatment related.
INTERPRETATION: Supplementation of women with cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day during pregnancy did not lead to increased offspring whole-body BMC compared with placebo, but did show that 1000 IU of cholecalciferol daily is sufficient to ensure that most pregnant women are vitamin D replete, and it is safe. These findings support current approaches to vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. Results of the ongoing MAVIDOS childhood follow-up study are awaited. FUNDING: Arthritis Research UK, Medical Research Council, Bupa Foundation, and National Institute for Health Research.
Copyright © 2016 Cooper et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26944421      PMCID: PMC4843969          DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00044-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol        ISSN: 2213-8587            Impact factor:   32.069


  37 in total

1.  Vitamin D and bone development.

Authors:  R J Moon; N C Harvey; J H Davies; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Maternal vitamin D status in pregnancy is associated with adiposity in the offspring: findings from the Southampton Women's Survey.

Authors:  Sarah R Crozier; Nicholas C Harvey; Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Cyrus Cooper; Siân M Robinson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Foetal and postnatal growth and bone mass at 6 months: the Generation R Study.

Authors:  Lamise Ay; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Henriëtte A Moll; Hein Raat; Eric A P Steegers; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Longitudinal tracking of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone measures over 6 years in children and adolescents: persistence of low bone mass to maturity.

Authors:  Tishya A L Wren; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Babette S Zemel; Joan M Lappe; Sharon Oberfield; John A Shepherd; Karen K Winer; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Low total body bone mineral content and high bone resorption in Korean winter-born versus summer-born newborn infants.

Authors:  R Namgung; R C Tsang; C Lee; D G Han; M L Ho; R I Sierra
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Paternal skeletal size predicts intrauterine bone mineral accrual.

Authors:  N C Harvey; M K Javaid; J R Poole; P Taylor; S M Robinson; H M Inskip; K M Godfrey; C Cooper; E M Dennison
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Maternal plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and birthweight, growth and bone mineral accretion of Gambian infants.

Authors:  Ann Prentice; Landing M A Jarjou; Gail R Goldberg; Janet Bennett; Tim J Cole; Inez Schoenmakers
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.299

8.  Maternal predictors of neonatal bone size and geometry: the Southampton Women's Survey.

Authors:  N C Harvey; M K Javaid; N K Arden; J R Poole; S R Crozier; S M Robinson; H M Inskip; K M Godfrey; E M Dennison; C Cooper
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Evidence of associations between feto-maternal vitamin D status, cord parathyroid hormone and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and newborn whole body bone mineral content.

Authors:  Daphna K Dror; Janet C King; Ellen B Fung; Marta D Van Loan; Erik R Gertz; Lindsay H Allen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  The effect of maternal vitamin D concentration on fetal bone.

Authors:  C Ioannou; M K Javaid; P Mahon; M K Yaqub; N C Harvey; K M Godfrey; J A Noble; C Cooper; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  84 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin D in pediatric age: consensus of the Italian Pediatric Society and the Italian Society of Preventive and Social Pediatrics, jointly with the Italian Federation of Pediatricians.

Authors:  Giuseppe Saggese; Francesco Vierucci; Flavia Prodam; Fabio Cardinale; Irene Cetin; Elena Chiappini; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Maddalena Massari; Emanuele Miraglia Del Giudice; Michele Miraglia Del Giudice; Diego Peroni; Luigi Terracciano; Rino Agostiniani; Domenico Careddu; Daniele Giovanni Ghiglioni; Gianni Bona; Giuseppe Di Mauro; Giovanni Corsello
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 2.  Vitamin D replacement in children, adolescents and pregnant women in the Middle East and North Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Marlene Chakhtoura; Sara El Ghandour; Khaled Shawwa; Elie A Akl; Asma Arabi; Ziyad Mahfoud; Robert Habib; Hassan Hoballah; Ghada El Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 8.694

3.  Gestational Age and Maternal Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D Concentration Interact to Affect the 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D Concentration in Pregnant Adolescents.

Authors:  Cora M Best; Eva K Pressman; Ruth Anne Queenan; Elizabeth Cooper; Françoise Vermeylen; Kimberly O O'Brien
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Gestational vitamin D and childhood bone health.

Authors:  Nicholas C Harvey; Rebecca Moon; Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 32.069

5.  Maternal vitamin D and offspring trabecular bone score.

Authors:  N K Hyde; S L Brennan-Olsen; J D Wark; S M Hosking; K L Holloway; J A Pasco
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Interventions for Prevention and Control of Epidemic of Vitamin D Deficiency.

Authors:  Raman Kumar Marwaha; Aashima Dabas
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 7.  The epidemiology of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael A Clynes; Nicholas C Harvey; Elizabeth M Curtis; Nicholas R Fuggle; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.291

8.  Analysis of the MAVIDOS trial - Author's reply.

Authors:  Nicholas C Harvey; Rebecca J Moon; Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 32.069

9.  Maternal vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and offspring outcomes: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Saroj Kumar Sahoo; Kishore Kumar Katam; Vinita Das; Anjoo Agarwal; Vijayalakshmi Bhatia
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Effect of High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnancy on Bone Mineralization in Offspring Until Age 6 Years: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Double-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nicklas Brustad; Juri Garland; Jonathan Thorsen; Astrid Sevelsted; Martin Krakauer; Rebecca K Vinding; Jakob Stokholm; Klaus Bønnelykke; Hans Bisgaard; Bo L Chawes
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 16.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.