Cyrus Cooper1, Nicholas C Harvey2, Nicholas J Bishop3, Stephen Kennedy4, Aris T Papageorghiou4, Inez Schoenmakers5, Robert Fraser6, Saurabh V Gandhi6, Andrew Carr7, Stefania D'Angelo8, Sarah R Crozier8, Rebecca J Moon8, Nigel K Arden7, Elaine M Dennison8, Keith M Godfrey2, Hazel M Inskip8, Ann Prentice5, M Zulf Mughal9, Richard Eastell10, David M Reid11, M Kassim Javaid7. 1. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Oxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: cc@mrc.soton.ac.uk. 2. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. 3. Academic Unit of Child Health, Sheffield Children's Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 4. Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 5. MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK. 6. Sheffield Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 7. Oxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 8. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK. 9. Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospitals, Manchester, UK. 10. Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 11. School of Medicine and Dentistry, Medical School, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal vitamin D status has been associated with bone mass of offspring in many, but not all, observational studies. However, maternal vitamin D repletion during pregnancy has not yet been proven to improve offspring bone mass in a randomised controlled trial. We aimed to assess whether neonates born to mothers supplemented withvitamin D during pregnancy have greater whole-body bone mineral content (BMC) at birth than those of mothers who had not received supplementation. METHODS: The Maternal Vitamin D Osteoporosis Study (MAVIDOS) was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial that recruited pregnant women from three study sites in the UK (Southampton, Oxford, and Sheffield). Eligible participants were older than 18 years, with a singleton pregnancy, gestation of less than 17 weeks, and a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentration of 25-100 nmol/L at 10-17 weeks' gestation. P'articipants were randomly assigned (1:1), in randomly permuted blocks of ten, to either cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day or matched placebo, taken orally, from 14 weeks' gestation (or as soon as possible before 17 weeks' gestation if recruited later) until delivery. Participants and the research team were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was neonatal whole-body BMC, assessed within 2 weeks of birth by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), analysed in all randomly assigned neonates who had a usable DXA scan. Safety outcomes were assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, ISRCTN 82927713, and the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT 2007-001716-23. FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2008, and Feb 11, 2014, we randomly assigned 569 pregnant women toplacebo and 565 to cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day. 370 (65%) neonates in the placebo group and 367 (65%) neonates in the cholecalciferol group had a usable DXA scan and were analysed for the primary endpoint. Neonatal whole-body BMC of infants born to mothers assigned to cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day did not significantly differ from that of infants born to mothers assigned to placebo (61·6 g [95% CI 60·3-62·8] vs 60·5 g [59·3-61·7], respectively; p=0·21). We noted no significant differences in safety outcomes, apart from a greater proportion of women in the placebo group with severe post-partum haemorrhage than those in the cholecalciferol group (96 [17%] of 569 mothers in the placebo group vs 65 [12%] of 565 mothers in the cholecalciferol group; p=0·01). No adverse events were deemed to be treatment related. INTERPRETATION: Supplementation of women withcholecalciferol 1000 IU/day during pregnancy did not lead to increased offspring whole-body BMC compared with placebo, but did show that 1000 IU of cholecalciferol daily is sufficient to ensure that most pregnant women are vitamin D replete, and it is safe. These findings support current approaches to vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. Results of the ongoing MAVIDOS childhood follow-up study are awaited. FUNDING: Arthritis Research UK, Medical Research Council, Bupa Foundation, and National Institute for Health Research.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Maternal vitamin D status has been associated with bone mass of offspring in many, but not all, observational studies. However, maternal vitamin D repletion during pregnancy has not yet been proven to improve offspring bone mass in a randomised controlled trial. We aimed to assess whether neonates born to mothers supplemented with vitamin D during pregnancy have greater whole-body bone mineral content (BMC) at birth than those of mothers who had not received supplementation. METHODS: The Maternal Vitamin DOsteoporosis Study (MAVIDOS) was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial that recruited pregnant women from three study sites in the UK (Southampton, Oxford, and Sheffield). Eligible participants were older than 18 years, with a singleton pregnancy, gestation of less than 17 weeks, and a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentration of 25-100 nmol/L at 10-17 weeks' gestation. P'articipants were randomly assigned (1:1), in randomly permuted blocks of ten, to either cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day or matched placebo, taken orally, from 14 weeks' gestation (or as soon as possible before 17 weeks' gestation if recruited later) until delivery. Participants and the research team were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was neonatal whole-body BMC, assessed within 2 weeks of birth by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), analysed in all randomly assigned neonates who had a usable DXA scan. Safety outcomes were assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, ISRCTN 82927713, and the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT 2007-001716-23. FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2008, and Feb 11, 2014, we randomly assigned 569 pregnant women to placebo and 565 to cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day. 370 (65%) neonates in the placebo group and 367 (65%) neonates in the cholecalciferol group had a usable DXA scan and were analysed for the primary endpoint. Neonatal whole-body BMC of infants born to mothers assigned to cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day did not significantly differ from that of infants born to mothers assigned to placebo (61·6 g [95% CI 60·3-62·8] vs 60·5 g [59·3-61·7], respectively; p=0·21). We noted no significant differences in safety outcomes, apart from a greater proportion of women in the placebo group with severe post-partum haemorrhage than those in the cholecalciferol group (96 [17%] of 569 mothers in the placebo group vs 65 [12%] of 565 mothers in the cholecalciferol group; p=0·01). No adverse events were deemed to be treatment related. INTERPRETATION: Supplementation of women with cholecalciferol 1000 IU/day during pregnancy did not lead to increased offspring whole-body BMC compared with placebo, but did show that 1000 IU of cholecalciferol daily is sufficient to ensure that most pregnant women are vitamin D replete, and it is safe. These findings support current approaches to vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. Results of the ongoing MAVIDOS childhood follow-up study are awaited. FUNDING: Arthritis Research UK, Medical Research Council, Bupa Foundation, and National Institute for Health Research.
Authors: Sarah R Crozier; Nicholas C Harvey; Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Cyrus Cooper; Siân M Robinson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lamise Ay; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Henriëtte A Moll; Hein Raat; Eric A P Steegers; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Tishya A L Wren; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Babette S Zemel; Joan M Lappe; Sharon Oberfield; John A Shepherd; Karen K Winer; Vicente Gilsanz Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: N C Harvey; M K Javaid; J R Poole; P Taylor; S M Robinson; H M Inskip; K M Godfrey; C Cooper; E M Dennison Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ann Prentice; Landing M A Jarjou; Gail R Goldberg; Janet Bennett; Tim J Cole; Inez Schoenmakers Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.299
Authors: N C Harvey; M K Javaid; N K Arden; J R Poole; S R Crozier; S M Robinson; H M Inskip; K M Godfrey; E M Dennison; C Cooper Journal: J Dev Orig Health Dis Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: Daphna K Dror; Janet C King; Ellen B Fung; Marta D Van Loan; Erik R Gertz; Lindsay H Allen Journal: Nutrients Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: C Ioannou; M K Javaid; P Mahon; M K Yaqub; N C Harvey; K M Godfrey; J A Noble; C Cooper; A T Papageorghiou Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Giuseppe Saggese; Francesco Vierucci; Flavia Prodam; Fabio Cardinale; Irene Cetin; Elena Chiappini; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Maddalena Massari; Emanuele Miraglia Del Giudice; Michele Miraglia Del Giudice; Diego Peroni; Luigi Terracciano; Rino Agostiniani; Domenico Careddu; Daniele Giovanni Ghiglioni; Gianni Bona; Giuseppe Di Mauro; Giovanni Corsello Journal: Ital J Pediatr Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 2.638
Authors: Cora M Best; Eva K Pressman; Ruth Anne Queenan; Elizabeth Cooper; Françoise Vermeylen; Kimberly O O'Brien Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Nicholas C Harvey; Rebecca Moon; Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Michael A Clynes; Nicholas C Harvey; Elizabeth M Curtis; Nicholas R Fuggle; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Br Med Bull Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 4.291
Authors: Nicholas C Harvey; Rebecca J Moon; Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Nicklas Brustad; Juri Garland; Jonathan Thorsen; Astrid Sevelsted; Martin Krakauer; Rebecca K Vinding; Jakob Stokholm; Klaus Bønnelykke; Hans Bisgaard; Bo L Chawes Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 16.193