Literature DB >> 26944123

CSF tap test - Obsolete or appropriate test for predicting shunt responsiveness? A systemic review.

Mario Mihalj1, Krešimir Dolić2, Krešimir Kolić2, Vlatko Ledenko3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is no accurate test for diagnosing normal pressure hydrocephalus or for screening for patients who will benefit from shunt surgery. Additional tests, such as cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSF-TT), are often used in practice to provide further predictive value in detecting suitable patients for shunting. We performed a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the CSF-TT's effect on the outcome of main symptoms and on validity parameters in screening patients suitable for shunting.
METHODS: In February 2015 we searched electronic databases from their inception to the current date, using the following key words: normal pressure hydrocephalus, idiopathic normotensive hydrocephalus, shunt operation, CSF tap test, predictive value, validity. The search retrieved 8 articles explicitly addressing the topic.
RESULTS: There was a very high positive predictive value of CSF-TT: 92% (range from 73% to 100%) but a low negative predictive value: 37% (18%-50%). Also, the CSF-TT has high specificity: 75% (33%-100%) but average sensitivity: 58% (26%-87%). The overall accuracy of the test was 62% (45%-83%).
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review did not provide unambiguous validity of the CSF-TT in the screening of patients for shunting. The validity of the CSF-TT is good for patient inclusion for shunting due to the fact that the positive response to the test is very reliable. Unfortunately, the negative response to the test does not reliably make these patients ineligible for shunting. Further studies are needed to improve and standardize the methodology in order to optimize the detection power of the test.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF tap test; Idiopathic normotensive hydrocephalus; Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Predictive value; Shunt operation; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26944123     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  21 in total

1.  iNPH with parkinsonism: response to lumbar CSF drainage and ventriculoperitoneal shunting.

Authors:  Giovanni Mostile; Giacomo Portaro; Francesco Certo; Antonina Luca; Roberta Manna; Roberta Terranova; Roberto Altieri; Alessandra Nicoletti; Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo Barbagallo; Mario Zappia
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers profile of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Tommaso Schirinzi; Giulia Maria Sancesario; Giulia Di Lazzaro; Alessio D'Elia; Paola Imbriani; Simona Scalise; Antonio Pisani
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Clinical significance of vitamin D in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Chaejin Lee; Hyunwoo Seo; Sang-Youl Yoon; Sung Hyun Chang; Seong-Hyun Park; Jeong-Hyun Hwang; Kyunghun Kang; Chi-Hun Kim; Myong Hun Hahm; Eunhee Park; Jae Yun Ahn; Ki-Su Park
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Value of MRI-based semi-quantitative structural neuroimaging in predicting the prognosis of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt surgery.

Authors:  Jiakuan Chen; Wenjie He; Xiejun Zhang; Minrui Lv; Xi Zhou; Xiaolin Yang; Haihua Wei; Haiqin Ma; Hongbing Li; Jun Xia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Quantitative imaging features predict spinal tap response in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Eyal Lotan; Brianna E Damadian; Henry Rusinek; Megan Griffin; Benjamin Ades-Aron; Ning Lu; James Golomb; Ajax E George
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Neuropsychological assessments and cognitive profile mostly associated with shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: diagnostic and predictive parameters and practical implications.

Authors:  Mor Nimni; Penina Weiss; Chen Cohen; Yosef Laviv
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Progressive supranuclear palsy with marked ventricular dilatation mimicking normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Andrea Quattrone; Alessia Sarica; Domenico La Torre; Maurizio Morelli; Alessandro Mechelli; Pier Paolo Arcuri; Aldo Quattrone
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Systematic volumetric analysis predicts response to CSF drainage and outcome to shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Dan Wu; Abhay Moghekar; Wen Shi; Ari M Blitz; Susumu Mori
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Quantitative Evaluation of Gait Changes Using APDM Inertial Sensors After the External Lumbar Drain in Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Mengmeng He; Zhenyu Qi; Yunxiang Shao; Hui Yao; Xuewen Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yu Shi; Qinzhi E; Chengming Liu; Hongwei Hu; Jiangang Liu; Xiaoou Sun; Zhong Wang; Yulun Huang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Prognostic Utility of Disproportionately Enlarged Subarachnoid Space Hydrocephalus in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Treated with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Y Park; C R Park; C H Suh; M J Kim; W H Shim; S J Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.