Literature DB >> 34417636

Quantitative imaging features predict spinal tap response in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Eyal Lotan1, Brianna E Damadian2, Henry Rusinek3, Megan Griffin2, Benjamin Ades-Aron3, Ning Lu2, James Golomb4, Ajax E George2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gait improvement following high-volume lumbar puncture (HVLP) and continuous lumbar drain (cLD) is widely used to predict shunt response in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Here, we investigate differences in MRI volumetric and traditional measures between HVLP/cLD responders and non-responders to identify imaging features that may help predict HVLP/cLD response.
METHODS: Eighty-two patients with suspected NPH were studied retrospectively. Gait testing was performed before and immediately/24 h/72 h after HVLP/cLD. A positive response was defined as improvement in gait post-procedure. Thirty-six responders (26 men; mean age 79.3 ± 6.3) and 46 non-responders (25 men; mean age 77.2 ± 6.1) underwent pre-procedure brain MRI including a 3D T1-weighted sequence. Subcortical regional volumes were segmented using FreeSurfer. After normalizing for total intracranial volume, two-way type III ANCOVA test and chi-square test were used to characterize statistical group differences. Evans' index, callosal angle (CA), and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression models were tested using Akaike information criterion to determine which combination of metrics most accurately predicts HVLP/cLD response.
RESULTS: Responders and non-responders demonstrated no differences in total ventricular and white/gray matter volumes. CA (men only) and third and fourth ventricular volumes were smaller; and hippocampal volume was larger in responders (p < 0.05). Temporal horns volume correlated with degree of improvement in gait velocity in responders (p = 0.0006). The regression model was 76.8% accurate for HVLP/cLD response.
CONCLUSION: CA and third and fourth ventricular volumes and hippocampal volume may serve as potentially useful imaging features that may help predict spinal tap response and hence potentially shunt response.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Spinal tap; Volumetric analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34417636     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02782-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  35 in total

1.  SYMPTOMATIC OCCULT HYDROCEPHALUS WITH "NORMAL" CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID PRESSURE.A TREATABLE SYNDROME.

Authors:  R D ADAMS; C M FISHER; S HAKIM; R G OJEMANN; W H SWEET
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1965-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Use of Functional Ambulation Performance Score as measurement of gait ability: review.

Authors:  Arnaud Gouelle
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

3.  Clinical outcomes in the surgical treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Richard Shaw; Emma Everingham; Neil Mahant; Erica Jacobson; Brian Owler
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  High-Convexity Tightness Predicts the Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  W Narita; Y Nishio; T Baba; O Iizuka; T Ishihara; M Matsuda; M Iwasaki; T Tominaga; E Mori
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus Radscale: a radiological scale for structured evaluation.

Authors:  K Kockum; O Lilja-Lund; E-M Larsson; M Rosell; L Söderström; J Virhammar; K Laurell
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 6.089

6.  Diagnosis of Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus: Use of Traditional Measures in the Era of Volumetric MR Imaging.

Authors:  Nityanand Miskin; Hersh Patel; Ana M Franceschi; Benjamin Ades-Aron; Alexander Le; Brianna E Damadian; Christian Stanton; Yafell Serulle; James Golomb; Oded Gonen; Henry Rusinek; Ajax E George
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Absence of Disproportionately Enlarged Subarachnoid Space Hydrocephalus, a Sharp Callosal Angle, or Other Morphologic MRI Markers Should Not Be Used to Exclude Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus from Shunt Surgery.

Authors:  S Agerskov; M Wallin; P Hellström; D Ziegelitz; C Wikkelsö; M Tullberg
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study in 151 patients.

Authors:  Anthony Marmarou; Harold F Young; Gunes A Aygok; Satoshi Sawauchi; Osamu Tsuji; Takuji Yamamoto; Jana Dunbar
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Differentiating shunt-responsive normal pressure hydrocephalus from Alzheimer disease and normal aging: pilot study using automated MRI brain tissue segmentation.

Authors:  Yafell Serulle; Henry Rusinek; Ivan I Kirov; Hannah Milch; Els Fieremans; Alexander B Baxter; John McMenamy; Rajan Jain; Jeffrey Wisoff; James Golomb; Oded Gonen; Ajax E George
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Preoperative prognostic value of MRI findings in 108 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  J Virhammar; K Laurell; K G Cesarini; E-M Larsson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantitative Evans index estimation using ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter in supine and upright position.

Authors:  Mindaugas Urbonas; Nijole Raskauskiene; Vytenis Deltuva; Adomas Bunevicius
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Callosal Angle Sub-Score of the Radscale in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Is Associated with Positive Tap Test Response.

Authors:  Efstratios-Stylianos Pyrgelis; George P Paraskevas; Vasilios C Constantinides; Fotini Boufidou; Georgios Velonakis; Leonidas Stefanis; Elisabeth Kapaki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.